Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Boycott for spreading misinformation

Boycott for spreading misinformation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
8 Posts 6 Posters 95 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by George K
    #1

    Washington Post:

    alt text

    Also Washington Post ("We never said that.")

    alt text

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by Mik
      #2

      Lies, damn lies. I suspect it will rest on a Clintonesque 'what is is' argument.

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I think it's pretty cut and dried...

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Can you link the tweets instead of images? So we can read the stories?

          You were warned.

          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            Can you link the tweets instead of images? So we can read the stories?

            George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @jon-nyc said in Boycott for spreading misinformation:

            Can you link the tweets instead of images? So we can read the stories?

            My bad. I thought I was linking tweets, not images. Images posted correctly in original post.

            Also...

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              The WaPo editorial:

              https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/media/fox-news-is-a-hazard-to-our-democracy-its-time-to-take-the-fight-to-the-murdochs-heres-how/2021/01/22/1821f186-5cbe-11eb-b8bd-ee36b1cd18bf_story.html?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR0tuEIGzeFMqEh7syZFGHyG31Q_Bsq4VfJyMANV08j-lLomv9dfzL9och8

              How to get the Fox News monster under control? I do not believe the government should have any role in regulating what can and can’t be said on the air, although I often hear that proposed. That would be a cure worse than the disease. But let’s not count on the hope that the Fox-controlling Murdochs will develop a conscience.
              No, the only answer is to speak the language that the bigwigs at Fox will understand: Ratings. Advertising dollars. Profit.
              Corporations that advertise on Fox News should walk away, and citizens who care about the truth should demand that they do so (in addition to trying to steer their friends and relatives away from the network).

              https://www.mediaite.com/news/washington-post-denies-columnist-called-on-companies-to-boycott-fox-news/

              “Columns reflect the views of the writer and do not speak for The Post,” Shani George, the paper’s director of communications, said in a statement. “Margaret is a columnist, and like all of our columnists, she has wide leeway to express personal opinions and apply her own analysis. She did not call for a boycott in this column or in her tweets. As a columnist, though, she would be free to make that argument if she chose.”

              The Washington Post's director of communications seems unclear on the concept of "Corporations that advertise on Fox News should walk away, and citizens who care about the truth should demand that they do so (in addition to trying to steer their friends and relatives away from the network)."

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girl
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Is it an opinion piece from the opinion pages?

                If so, then we can easily find other news sources that often print or tell opinions that may not be agreed with by the parent company. Sometimes, they do that because they want to create controversy.

                IvorythumperI 1 Reply Last reply
                • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                  Is it an opinion piece from the opinion pages?

                  If so, then we can easily find other news sources that often print or tell opinions that may not be agreed with by the parent company. Sometimes, they do that because they want to create controversy.

                  IvorythumperI Offline
                  IvorythumperI Offline
                  Ivorythumper
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @taiwan_girl said in Boycott for spreading misinformation:

                  Is it an opinion piece from the opinion pages?

                  If so, then we can easily find other news sources that often print or tell opinions that may not be agreed with by the parent company. Sometimes, they do that because they want to create controversy.

                  Doesn't that basically mean that they will spread misinformation for other purpose (clicks, political propaganda, fomenting social unrest, etc.)? A corporation does not get absolution because they only allowed the spread of misinformation on their platform.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups