No jobs for you
-
Goofy!
-
@george-k said in No jobs for you:
The legislation, titled the Security Clearance Improvement Act of 2021, requires applicants looking to obtain or renew their federal security clearances to disclose if they participated in the Jan. 6 rally in Washington—or another “Stop the Steal” event—or if they “knowingly engaged in activities conducted by an organization or movement that spreads conspiracy theories and false information about the U.S. government.
If it excludes only those who breached the Capitol or those committed acts of violence at the event, I would have been fine with it. But merely participating at the Jan.6 Capitol protest and other rallies peacefully, or engaging with "organization and movement" is protected by the First Amendment.
-
Propose a law and see if you can get it passed.
In the meantime it’s discrimination I bet and I suspect you can get sued for it.
Oh and if you think this is justice just wait until scraped info is used against you or a loved one. Your impulsiveness will cost you dearly.
-
@jolly said in No jobs for you:
And Joe McCarthy smiled.
I heard here, after Obama was elected, as justification for firing democrats, that "elections have consequences." Several were in support of this.
-
@george-k said in No jobs for you:
While many Trump supporters have been quietly disposed of by their employers
That's a pretty big claim to start the article with.
-
@doctor-phibes said in No jobs for you:
@george-k said in No jobs for you:
While many Trump supporters have been quietly disposed of by their employers
That's a pretty big claim to start the article with.
I fully believe it. I've seen it happen in previous jobs. But let's not kid ourselves, we're only mad because the dems are doing it. This was fully supported here when the politics was reversed.
-
You guys are in the wrong business.
-
-
@aqua-letifer said in No jobs for you:
@jolly said in No jobs for you:
And Joe McCarthy smiled.
I heard here, after Obama was elected, as justification for firing democrats, that "elections have consequences." Several were in support of this.
How many were in favor of pissing on the Constitution?
-
@jolly said in No jobs for you:
@aqua-letifer said in No jobs for you:
@jolly said in No jobs for you:
And Joe McCarthy smiled.
I heard here, after Obama was elected, as justification for firing democrats, that "elections have consequences." Several were in support of this.
How many were in favor of pissing on the Constitution?
So they're worse in my mind, therefore hypocrisy's okay. Gotcha.