Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 04:03 last edited by jon-nyc 1 Jul 2021, 17:43
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 04:07 last edited by
Larry answered the question. Nobody paid any attention.
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 05:20 last edited by
But jon his opinion doesn't matter and is irrelevant because I don't like it.
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 17:44 last edited by
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 17:51 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Would be more interesting to see a republican who disagrees that it was a big deal. Otherwise it will be a long day watching all the retweets and Jon you are bound by time and volume to miss some good ones.
-
@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Would be more interesting to see a republican who disagrees that it was a big deal. Otherwise it will be a long day watching all the retweets and Jon you are bound by time and volume to miss some good ones.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 17:55 last edited by@loki said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Would be more interesting to see a republican who disagrees that it was a big deal.
My neighbor believes in the Deep State but I wouldn't describe it as interesting to listen to his bullshit.
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 17:56 last edited by
Everyone thinks it was a big deal, but there’s a bifurcation in the GOP between those with the courage to blame the author of the drama and those who lack it. It is interesting to see which side individuals fall on.
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 18:11 last edited by Renauda 1 Jul 2021, 18:18
So I take it that henceforth that Rockwell style picture of the past Republican presidents sitting around a table palying cards and laughing will have Trump airbrushed out?
Somehow I cannot see Eisenhower, Ford, Reagan, G.H.W. Bush wanting him at the table.
-
So I take it that henceforth that Rockwell style picture of the past Republican presidents sitting around a table palying cards and laughing will have Trump airbrushed out?
Somehow I cannot see Eisenhower, Ford, Reagan, G.H.W. Bush wanting him at the table.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 18:15 last edited by Aqua Letifer 1 Jul 2021, 18:15@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Somehow I cannot see Eisenhower, Ford, Reagan and G.H.W. Bush wanting him at the table.
Living presidents have already condemned him for his actions. But the Democratic ones don't matter because who cares what they have to say anyway, and look, with W, we're going to employ a tu quoque fallacy and point out how hypocritical it is that the left is quoting him now.
See? Now I'm all nice and comfortable again and I don't really have to deal with any of this.
-
@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Somehow I cannot see Eisenhower, Ford, Reagan and G.H.W. Bush wanting him at the table.
Living presidents have already condemned him for his actions. But the Democratic ones don't matter because who cares what they have to say anyway, and look, with W, we're going to employ a tu quoque fallacy and point out how hypocritical it is that the left is quoting him now.
See? Now I'm all nice and comfortable again and I don't really have to deal with any of this.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 18:19 last edited by Renauda 1 Jul 2021, 18:20Don't think Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would be all that impressed with his presence either.
-
Everyone thinks it was a big deal, but there’s a bifurcation in the GOP between those with the courage to blame the author of the drama and those who lack it. It is interesting to see which side individuals fall on.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 18:23 last edited by Loki 1 Jul 2021, 18:24@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Everyone thinks it was a big deal, but there’s a bifurcation in the GOP between those with the courage to blame the author of the drama and those who lack it. It is interesting to see which side individuals fall on.
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 18:40 last edited by
Calling out the President of the United States for inciting an insurrection is virtue signalling?
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 18:58 last edited by
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
-
@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Everyone thinks it was a big deal, but there’s a bifurcation in the GOP between those with the courage to blame the author of the drama and those who lack it. It is interesting to see which side individuals fall on.
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 19:17 last edited by@loki said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
You and others seem to not know the difference between commenting on (relatively speaking) the biggest threat to the peaceful transfer of power in the country's history and commenting on the abortion beliefs of the people who made your chicken sandwich.
-
Don't think Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would be all that impressed with his presence either.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 19:18 last edited by@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Don't think Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would be all that impressed with his presence either.
There you go trying to sound smart again with your obscure history stuff.
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:01 last edited by
There you go again with those negative waves, Moriarity.
-
Calling out the President of the United States for inciting an insurrection is virtue signalling?
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:05 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Calling out the President of the United States for inciting an insurrection is virtue signalling?
Of course not and that is not what I said.
-
@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Everyone thinks it was a big deal, but there’s a bifurcation in the GOP between those with the courage to blame the author of the drama and those who lack it. It is interesting to see which side individuals fall on.
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:06 last edited by@loki said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Everyone thinks it was a big deal, but there’s a bifurcation in the GOP between those with the courage to blame the author of the drama and those who lack it. It is interesting to see which side individuals fall on.
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
I’ll post again. My point is a response to this comment only.
-
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:14 last edited by@copper said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
Amen.
-
@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Don't think Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would be all that impressed with his presence either.
There you go trying to sound smart again with your obscure history stuff.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:15 last edited by@aqua-letifer said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Don't think Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would be all that impressed with his presence either.
There you go trying to sound smart again with your obscure history stuff.
Ever get tired of leaving snot tracks on the ceiling?