Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in
-
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:01 last edited by
There you go again with those negative waves, Moriarity.
-
Calling out the President of the United States for inciting an insurrection is virtue signalling?
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:05 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Calling out the President of the United States for inciting an insurrection is virtue signalling?
Of course not and that is not what I said.
-
@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Everyone thinks it was a big deal, but there’s a bifurcation in the GOP between those with the courage to blame the author of the drama and those who lack it. It is interesting to see which side individuals fall on.
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:06 last edited by@loki said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Everyone thinks it was a big deal, but there’s a bifurcation in the GOP between those with the courage to blame the author of the drama and those who lack it. It is interesting to see which side individuals fall on.
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
I’ll post again. My point is a response to this comment only.
-
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:14 last edited by@copper said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
Amen.
-
@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Don't think Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would be all that impressed with his presence either.
There you go trying to sound smart again with your obscure history stuff.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:15 last edited by@aqua-letifer said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Don't think Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would be all that impressed with his presence either.
There you go trying to sound smart again with your obscure history stuff.
Ever get tired of leaving snot tracks on the ceiling?
-
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:18 last edited by@copper said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
Disingenuous nonsense designed to give him excuses. No different than saying he is occasionally impolite. In reality he is more like rarely, if ever, polite.
The moment your so-called anti-politician took the Oath of Office he ceased to be the anti-politician he might have campaigned as and pretended to be. He then became a politician whether or not he or is base wanted him to be one.
Likewise yesterday, when he rallied his mob and sent them onward to the Capitol Building. He certainly proved himself to be every bit a politician as any past has-been political demagogue that ever walked this planet.
-
@loki said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
You and others seem to not know the difference between commenting on (relatively speaking) the biggest threat to the peaceful transfer of power in the country's history and commenting on the abortion beliefs of the people who made your chicken sandwich.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:21 last edited by@aqua-letifer said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
@loki said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
You and others seem to not know the difference between commenting on (relatively speaking) the biggest threat to the peaceful transfer of power in the country's history and commenting on the abortion beliefs of the people who made your chicken sandwich.
The events of yesterday are not even close to placing the Republic in peril. You realize a large portion of the country didn't even pay much attention to the events, they're more worried about recovering from COVID or how they're going to come up with rent next month.
It's just more fringe political crap.
The sun will come up tomorrow. I hope it comes up on some Washington pols, who will listen to the better angels of their natures. But, I doubt it.
-
@copper said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
Disingenuous nonsense designed to give him excuses. No different than saying he is occasionally impolite. In reality he is more like rarely, if ever, polite.
The moment your so-called anti-politician took the Oath of Office he ceased to be the anti-politician he might have campaigned as and pretended to be. He then became a politician whether or not he or is base wanted him to be one.
Likewise yesterday, when he rallied his mob and sent them onward to the Capitol Building. He certainly proved himself to be every bit a politician as any past has-been political demagogue that ever walked this planet.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 20:24 last edited by@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
@copper said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
Disingenuous nonsense designed to give him excuses. No different than saying he is occasionally impolite. In reality he is more like rarely, if ever, polite.
The moment your so-called anti-politician took the Oath of Office he ceased to be the anti-politician he might have campaigned as and pretended to be. He then became a politician whether or not he or is base wanted him to be one.
Likewise yesterday, when he rallied his mob and sent them onward to the Capitol Building. He certainly proved himself to be every bit a politician as any past has-been political demagogue that ever walked this planet.
Don't think so. While politically adept at some things, Trump has never been a politician. Certainly not the prototypical, measure-every-word, play the leak game, Washington pol.
He has not acted like one. He has not spoke like one. He has certainly not governed like one.
-
@copper said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
Disingenuous nonsense designed to give him excuses. No different than saying he is occasionally impolite. In reality he is more like rarely, if ever, polite.
The moment your so-called anti-politician took the Oath of Office he ceased to be the anti-politician he might have campaigned as and pretended to be. He then became a politician whether or not he or is base wanted him to be one.
Likewise yesterday, when he rallied his mob and sent them onward to the Capitol Building. He certainly proved himself to be every bit a politician as any past has-been political demagogue that ever walked this planet.
wrote on 7 Jan 2021, 22:03 last edited by@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
@copper said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
Disingenuous nonsense designed to give him excuses. No different than saying he is occasionally impolite. In reality he is more like rarely, if ever, polite.
The moment your so-called anti-politician took the Oath of Office he ceased to be the anti-politician he might have campaigned as and pretended to be. He then became a politician whether or not he or is base wanted him to be one.
Likewise yesterday, when he rallied his mob and sent them onward to the Capitol Building. He certainly proved himself to be every bit a politician as any past has-been political demagogue that ever walked this planet.
You hate Mr. Trump
I'm shocked
Come on, tell us again and maybe insult him a few times
Maybe say Disingenuous nonsense again
Go on say it
I said that politicians will never like Mr. Trump, they never have, they never will
That is not disingenuous nonsense
Do you hate Mr. Trump? Come on remind us again, you are soooooo virtuous
-
@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
@copper said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
Disingenuous nonsense designed to give him excuses. No different than saying he is occasionally impolite. In reality he is more like rarely, if ever, polite.
The moment your so-called anti-politician took the Oath of Office he ceased to be the anti-politician he might have campaigned as and pretended to be. He then became a politician whether or not he or is base wanted him to be one.
Likewise yesterday, when he rallied his mob and sent them onward to the Capitol Building. He certainly proved himself to be every bit a politician as any past has-been political demagogue that ever walked this planet.
You hate Mr. Trump
I'm shocked
Come on, tell us again and maybe insult him a few times
Maybe say Disingenuous nonsense again
Go on say it
I said that politicians will never like Mr. Trump, they never have, they never will
That is not disingenuous nonsense
Do you hate Mr. Trump? Come on remind us again, you are soooooo virtuous