Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in
-
-
Larry answered the question. Nobody paid any attention.
-
But jon his opinion doesn't matter and is irrelevant because I don't like it.
-
@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Would be more interesting to see a republican who disagrees that it was a big deal. Otherwise it will be a long day watching all the retweets and Jon you are bound by time and volume to miss some good ones.
-
@loki said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Would be more interesting to see a republican who disagrees that it was a big deal.
My neighbor believes in the Deep State but I wouldn't describe it as interesting to listen to his bullshit.
-
So I take it that henceforth that Rockwell style picture of the past Republican presidents sitting around a table palying cards and laughing will have Trump airbrushed out?
Somehow I cannot see Eisenhower, Ford, Reagan, G.H.W. Bush wanting him at the table.
“Little by little I am learning the art of being quite content by doing very little slowly” ~ Lionel Hardcastle
-
@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Somehow I cannot see Eisenhower, Ford, Reagan and G.H.W. Bush wanting him at the table.
Living presidents have already condemned him for his actions. But the Democratic ones don't matter because who cares what they have to say anyway, and look, with W, we're going to employ a tu quoque fallacy and point out how hypocritical it is that the left is quoting him now.
See? Now I'm all nice and comfortable again and I don't really have to deal with any of this.
Please love yourself.
-
Don't think Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would be all that impressed with his presence either.
“Little by little I am learning the art of being quite content by doing very little slowly” ~ Lionel Hardcastle
-
@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Everyone thinks it was a big deal, but there’s a bifurcation in the GOP between those with the courage to blame the author of the drama and those who lack it. It is interesting to see which side individuals fall on.
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
-
-
@loki said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
You and others seem to not know the difference between commenting on (relatively speaking) the biggest threat to the peaceful transfer of power in the country's history and commenting on the abortion beliefs of the people who made your chicken sandwich.
-
@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Don't think Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would be all that impressed with his presence either.
There you go trying to sound smart again with your obscure history stuff.
-
@loki said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
@jon-nyc said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Everyone thinks it was a big deal, but there’s a bifurcation in the GOP between those with the courage to blame the author of the drama and those who lack it. It is interesting to see which side individuals fall on.
So if you don’t virtue signal in twitter you are suspect? House on unamerican activities committee?
I’ll post again. My point is a response to this comment only.
-
@copper said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
You guys are wondering if some has-been politicians will love the anti-politician.
They won't.
They are politicians.
I think you are still missing the point of yesterday's exercise.
Amen.
-
@aqua-letifer said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
@renauda said in Jonathan Turley (and others) weigh in:
Don't think Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would be all that impressed with his presence either.
There you go trying to sound smart again with your obscure history stuff.
Ever get tired of leaving snot tracks on the ceiling?
