New House Rules
-
It is a good change to generalize official communications to use non gender specific terms where such terms exist and befit the intent of the communication.
It is also not contradictory for a person to choose a gender specific term to label herself, as Speaker Pelosi has done in her Twitter profile.
That’s the right balance between maintaining equal treatment for all under public policy and respecting the individual’s freedom of expression.
-
It is a good change to generalize official communications to use non gender specific terms where such terms exist and befit the intent of the communication.
It is also not contradictory for a person to choose a gender specific term to label herself, as Speaker Pelosi has done in her Twitter profile.
That’s the right balance between maintaining equal treatment for all under public policy and respecting the individual’s freedom of expression.
-
It is a good change to generalize official communications to use non gender specific terms where such terms exist and befit the intent of the communication.
It is also not contradictory for a person to choose a gender specific term to label herself, as Speaker Pelosi has done in her Twitter profile.
That’s the right balance between maintaining equal treatment for all under public policy and respecting the individual’s freedom of expression.
@axtremus said in New House Rules:
It is a good change to generalize official communications to use non gender specific terms where such terms exist and befit the intent of the communication.
It is also not contradictory for a person to choose a gender specific term to label herself, as Speaker Pelosi has done in her Twitter profile.
That’s the right balance between maintaining equal treatment for all under public policy and respecting the individual’s freedom of expression.
Your stupidity never ceases to amaze me.
-
It is a good change to generalize official communications to use non gender specific terms where such terms exist and befit the intent of the communication.
It is also not contradictory for a person to choose a gender specific term to label herself, as Speaker Pelosi has done in her Twitter profile.
That’s the right balance between maintaining equal treatment for all under public policy and respecting the individual’s freedom of expression.
@axtremus said in New House Rules:
That’s the right balance between maintaining equal treatment for all under public policy and respecting the individual’s freedom of expression.
You're absolutely not the guy I'd go to to make that call.
-
It is a good change to generalize official communications to use non gender specific terms where such terms exist and befit the intent of the communication.
It is also not contradictory for a person to choose a gender specific term to label herself, as Speaker Pelosi has done in her Twitter profile.
That’s the right balance between maintaining equal treatment for all under public policy and respecting the individual’s freedom of expression.
@axtremus said in New House Rules:
It is a good change to generalize official communications to use non gender specific terms where such terms exist and befit the intent of the communication.
Got to disagree with you there, Ax.
This bill is dumb, but I'm confident that it will be roundly ignored.
-
@axtremus said in New House Rules:
It is a good change to generalize official communications to use non gender specific terms where such terms exist and befit the intent of the communication.
Got to disagree with you there, Ax.
This bill is dumb, but I'm confident that it will be roundly ignored.
@catseye3 it's not a "bill" and therefore doesn't have the power of law.
It is, however, the proposed "rule" by which future bills will be drafted, and presumably how members of Congress will address xim, zer, them, etc....
-
@catseye3 it's not a "bill" and therefore doesn't have the power of law.
It is, however, the proposed "rule" by which future bills will be drafted, and presumably how members of Congress will address xim, zer, them, etc....
