Trump lawyer called for brutal killing of former election security official
-
18 U.S. Code § 2381.Treason
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
-
@Larry said in Trump lawyer called for brutal killing of former election security official:
There's nothing extremist about saying that if a person is guilty of treason the legal punishment for that crime is execution.
But there's everything extremist about saying that 2/3 of the democrat party is guilty of treason, and that's what you did.
Look, you'd be banned on 99% of all forums or social media for comments like these. Only the completely fringe websites or those that have an exceptionally strong anti-censorship stance like TNCR don't kick you out. I wouldn't overtax that policy, though.
-
-
@Larry said in Trump lawyer called for brutal killing of former election security official:
I clearly said it was my opinion. Last time I checked everyone has a right to their opinion.
Death threats are a criminal offence in most jurisdictions, and I believe that includes the US.
-
Saying you think members of the opposition party should be killed on a public forum isn't the smartest thing you can do.
The fact that you don't think it's an extremist view, or that it's your opinion is really irrelevant. I doubt many of us take your outpourings particularly seriously, but other people might.
Proud supporter of Plan 2525. Everything you think, do and say will be in the pill you took today.
-
@Larry said in Trump lawyer called for brutal killing of former election security official:
Treason is punishable by death. Two thirds of the democrat party should be executed.
@Cato_the_Elder said in All his Speeches:
Ceterum autem censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
Clearly, Cato was not at all making a threat or pushed for war. It was just his opinion.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trump lawyer called for brutal killing of former election security official:
Saying you think members of the opposition party should be killed on a public forum isn't the smartest thing you can do.
The fact that you don't think it's an extremist view, or that it's your opinion is really irrelevant. I doubt many of us take your outpourings particularly seriously,
I never said that. I stated that the punishment for treason is execution. That is a straight out fact. Then, based on that fact, I said two thirds of democrat politicians should be executed. That is an opinion, based on the previously stated fact. Nowhere did i say to execute anyone. I simply made the point that in my opinion two thirds of the democrat politicians are guilty of treason. Then two idiots jumped in calling me an extremist, accusing me of thi us I hadn't said, etc. So I clarified my meaning since both of them obviously were either too dumb to understand me, or using their twisting of what I said to shut me down, or both. Then I was threatened with banning based on his own failure to understand what I said. Apparently Klaus is of the opinion that since he found this forum host and set it up, he is the King here and gets to threaten anyone who says something he doesn't like.
As to your second point, I frankly don't give a fuck that you "doubt many of us take your outpourings particularly seriously". No one takes you seriously.
Now - you, 89th, and Klaus- get off my fucking back. I don't give a fuck about your opinion of me.
-
You infer a threat to ban you from what I said but don't consider your statement a threat? Wow, the amount of cognitive dissonance that a single brain can handle is truly fascinating.
You should really consider donating your brain to medical research after you die. Seriously. It may advance the field of psychopathology by decades.
-
@Klaus said in Trump lawyer called for brutal killing of former election security official:
You infer a threat to ban you from what I said but don't consider your statement a threat? Wow, the amount of cognitive dissonance that a single brain can handle is truly fascinating.
You should really consider donating your brain to medical research after you die. Seriously.
I absolutely do NOT consider my statement a threat. And I clarified my I tent once I realized that you weren't intelligent enough to sort it out on your own. For that I was labeled an extremist, and threatened with being banned. All because YOU can't follow a conversation.
You are a piece of shit in my opinion, and that has been my opinion if you ever since you stooped to making racially tainted slurs toward my wife. So fuck you.
-
@Larry said in Trump lawyer called for brutal killing of former election security official:
No one takes you seriously
I would certainly hope not.
-
Trumpism Delenda Est
DON’T let them eat cake.
- RFK Jr -
It’s more of a wish.
-
-
Edit - removed, as Loki deleted post I was replying to.
