Trump himself consents to transition
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 13:11 last edited by Catseye3
Thanks. I thought she was somebody reprising Scarlett's famous line about "as God as my witness, I will never be hungry again!"
-
The same people who demonize Trump for not conceding are the ones who lionize this woman, for among other things, not conceding.
I left my GKSRs at the old forum.
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 13:16 last edited by@George-K said in Trump himself consents to transition:
The same people who demonize Trump for not conceding are the ones who lionize this woman, for among other things, not conceding.
Uh, hard nope! Never lionized her, totally not a fan. Actively spoke out against her to friends who talked about her as VP candidate.
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 13:21 last edited by
Trump made the decision to begin the transition process because his people were having their lives threatened, not because he's giving up. It's just more of the same crap we've seen happening from the first day the corrupt democrats found out they had lost to Trump.
The other bit of crowing by the Left about Sydney Powell is unraveling too. She has released a statement saying she agrees with what was said, that she never was and had never claimed to be a member of the Trump legal team, had never been paid a cent by them, and had never billed them for her work. There's a reason, which Powell didn't say but others have speculated on... t seems that legally, Trump's legal team cannot pursue criminal charges against other public officials..... but as an independent lawyer not on Trump's legal team Powell can pursue criminal charges...
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 13:24 last edited by
Larry you’re definitely part of the ‘some’ people that he can fool all of the time.
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 13:27 last edited by
We will see which one is being fooled, won't we..... lol
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 13:30 last edited by
And you'd better hope it's you, because if Biden gets in office this nation is doomed.
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 13:32 last edited by
-
@George-K said in Trump himself consents to transition:
The same people who demonize Trump for not conceding are the ones who lionize this woman, for among other things, not conceding.
Uh, hard nope! Never lionized her, totally not a fan. Actively spoke out against her to friends who talked about her as VP candidate.
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 13:34 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Trump himself consents to transition:
Uh, hard nope! Never lionized her, totally not a fan. Actively spoke out against her to friends who talked about her as VP candidate.
I wasn't directing that at you, specifically, but generally to others who think that she's the (big) tits. I have yet to see a Democrat in any kind of political position denounce her for not conceding. Instead, she was given a platform at the Democratic Convention.
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 13:37 last edited by
Well, she should be redeplatformed immediately!
-
@jon-nyc said in Trump himself consents to transition:
Uh, hard nope! Never lionized her, totally not a fan. Actively spoke out against her to friends who talked about her as VP candidate.
I wasn't directing that at you, specifically, but generally to others who think that she's the (big) tits. I have yet to see a Democrat in any kind of political position denounce her for not conceding. Instead, she was given a platform at the Democratic Convention.
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 14:10 last edited by@George-K Article about what you are talking about.
From the article
“Gabriel Sterling, Georgia's voting system implementation manager, said in a November press conference that both claims are false.
"For the people out there who are irritated with people talking about voter fraud right now, they should be equally irritated with people who talked about voter suppression two years ago," he said. "Both undermine confidence in the system." “
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 16:47 last edited by Copper
@jon-nyc said in Trump himself consents to transition:
Larry you’re definitely part of the ‘some’ people that he can fool all of the time.
Ya, like those people who thought Mr. Trump wouldn't leave if he lost.
If he loses he will leave just like every other president left.
The TDS stories about how he won't leave were, and are still, just plain stupid. Made up out of thin air.
Mr. Trump is doing exactly what he said he would do, and exactly what Ms. Clinton advised. Fight for as long as you can.
It is a heroic plan.
Good for him, he is fighting for his supporters like he has for 4 years.
If he simply conceded such a close election it would be like OJ simply pleading guilty.
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 16:56 last edited by
Yes my prediction has always been that he'll leave office just like all the others always have after losing an election, and there will be some heat but no light regarding not conceding. TDS makes this heat meaningful to some, but it is not meaningful to the rest of us.
The saddest losers in this whole situation are the progressives looking forward to the violent protests by the right. Divorced from reality as always, their predictions are just plain stupid.
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 17:15 last edited by
Next prediction....
Even as the MSM can find little fault with Biden, they will continue to feed the ravenous TDS crowd. Defeating Trump in the election is simply not good enough. In order to catch eyeballs, they must destroy him.
The Deep State demands it.
-
Yes my prediction has always been that he'll leave office just like all the others always have after losing an election, and there will be some heat but no light regarding not conceding. TDS makes this heat meaningful to some, but it is not meaningful to the rest of us.
The saddest losers in this whole situation are the progressives looking forward to the violent protests by the right. Divorced from reality as always, their predictions are just plain stupid.
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 17:35 last edited by@Horace said in Trump himself consents to transition:
Yes my prediction has always been that he'll leave office just like all the others always have after losing an election, and there will be some heat but no light regarding not conceding. TDS makes this heat meaningful to some, but it is not meaningful to the rest of us.
TDS makes the heat meaningful to some.
But Horace is that really your position? Am I deranged for thinking that the US president claiming an election is rigged and a seemingly significant fraction of the population believing him is a meaningful (and concerning) thing?
-
Yes my prediction has always been that he'll leave office just like all the others always have after losing an election, and there will be some heat but no light regarding not conceding. TDS makes this heat meaningful to some, but it is not meaningful to the rest of us.
The saddest losers in this whole situation are the progressives looking forward to the violent protests by the right. Divorced from reality as always, their predictions are just plain stupid.
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 17:38 last edited by jon-nyc@Horace said in Trump himself consents to transition:
Yes my prediction has always been that he'll leave office just like all the others always have after losing an election, and there will be some heat but no light regarding not conceding.
You gave me more of a hard time than anyone else when I said back in June he would (1) try to eliminate whole classes of votes, and (2) try to get friendly legislatures to throw out the vote and appoint competing electors.
You were even a bit of a bull dog about it, asking me multiple times for the precise mechanism, as if I was going to cite PA election law or give you the Michigan canvasser’s name or something.
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 18:10 last edited by
No, you had what some electors did to try to win the election for Hillary in 2016 in your back pocket but never played the card because you enjoyed the smug knowledge.
-
@Horace said in Trump himself consents to transition:
Yes my prediction has always been that he'll leave office just like all the others always have after losing an election, and there will be some heat but no light regarding not conceding. TDS makes this heat meaningful to some, but it is not meaningful to the rest of us.
TDS makes the heat meaningful to some.
But Horace is that really your position? Am I deranged for thinking that the US president claiming an election is rigged and a seemingly significant fraction of the population believing him is a meaningful (and concerning) thing?
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 18:12 last edited by Horace@Moonbat said in Trump himself consents to transition:
@Horace said in Trump himself consents to transition:
Yes my prediction has always been that he'll leave office just like all the others always have after losing an election, and there will be some heat but no light regarding not conceding. TDS makes this heat meaningful to some, but it is not meaningful to the rest of us.
TDS makes the heat meaningful to some.
But Horace is that really your position? Am I deranged for thinking that the US president claiming an election is rigged and a seemingly significant fraction of the population believing him is a meaningful (and concerning) thing?
It was certainly a predictable thing based on Trump's personality. I don't think I ever claimed he wouldn't do it. I always claimed it would be heat no light. You can be concerned with it, that's fine. We all weigh our concerns differently. I was rather concerned with the floyd protests, but the left seemed not to be, at all. So let's try to play fair.
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 18:21 last edited by
For me, the concern is the general erosion of belief in democratic principles. A group of people willing to riot, or so angry about perceived injustice that they feel they have no other recourse, another group willing to waste months on an investigation that was clearly going nowhere, and then a President who is unwilling to accept the results of a general election, and who is more than happy to fire up his supporters so that they also don't believe that the next incumbent has a right to the position.
And the internet really isn't helping.
-
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 18:27 last edited by
Trump "firing up his supporters" is qualitatively different than the left firing up their supporters. We are watching the proof. It would be good if we could all admit to it.
-
No, you had what some electors did to try to win the election for Hillary in 2016 in your back pocket but never played the card because you enjoyed the smug knowledge.
wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 18:28 last edited by@Horace said in Trump himself consents to transition:
No, you had what some electors did to try to win the election for Hillary in 2016 in your back pocket but never played the card because you enjoyed the smug knowledge.
Nope. I was very explicit. Invalidate whole classes of votes and enlist legislatures to appoint competing electors. I even referenced the precedent of 1876.