He's right.
-
@Jolly said in He's right.:
@Larry said in He's right.:
But the Welsh..... nah...
Hey, they can sing!
Ya -a - a - a - a - !.........
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in He's right.:
That's what I said 2 hours ago. Do try and keep up, grandad.
I was actually replying to Jolly, who brought up Great Britain.
There's a reason...In that system, a small faction of votes can be bartered for political gain. In the U.S. system, that is much, much more difficult.
There is a reason the two major parties have a Majority Whip and a Minority Whip in Congress, and it has nothing to do with Cat's handcuffs and ball gag.
-
Seems like the Lincoln Project feels boxed in with no place to go.
Sorry not every start up works out. Now Fvck off and stop trying to take down others with you.
-
Like most political operatives, high level ones anyway, they had interests in the media buying and production companies they used for their ads. So they got paid while working for a worthy cause.
Everybody wins. Well, except Trump. lol
-
Like most political operatives, high level ones anyway, they had interests in the media buying and production companies they used for their ads. So they got paid while working for a worthy cause.
Everybody wins. Well, except Trump. lol
@jon-nyc said in He's right.:
Like most political operatives, high level ones anyway, they had interests in the media buying and production companies they used for their ads. So they got paid while working for a worthy cause.
Everybody wins. Well, except Trump. lol
The problem is, they are now radioactive.
-
@taiwan_girl said in He's right.:
@Jolly said in He's right.:
but it is treasonous to your party to start up crap like the Lincoln Project
No it’s not. As you have said, party philosophy changes.
What is considered Republic/Democrat today is different from Republic/Democrat from 20-40 years ago.
Nothing wrong with wanting change.
Do you simply do not understand politics? Or party discipline? If the party becomes nothing but a herd of cats, nothing can be accomplished. And if you aren't in power, you accomplish much less than if you are.
This is not Great Britain. There are no wild-ass factions that can carve out their own little 5% and be effective.
@Jolly said in He's right.:
@taiwan_girl said in He's right.:
@Jolly said in He's right.:
but it is treasonous to your party to start up crap like the Lincoln Project
No it’s not. As you have said, party philosophy changes.
What is considered Republic/Democrat today is different from Republic/Democrat from 20-40 years ago.
Nothing wrong with wanting change.
Do you simply do not understand politics? Or party discipline? If the party becomes nothing but a herd of cats, nothing can be accomplished. And if you aren't in power, you accomplish much less than if you are.
This is not Great Britain. There are no wild-ass factions that can carve out their own little 5% and be effective.
Jolly,what I was thinking of was that the republican party of five years ago is probably different than the republican party of today.
Was President Trump responsible for that? Probably yes. Was he treasonous for trying to change the party? No, I don’t think so
There are current people within the Republican Party who don’t like the change. So they are going to change, or want to change what it has become. That is all
-
@Jolly said in He's right.:
@taiwan_girl said in He's right.:
@Jolly said in He's right.:
but it is treasonous to your party to start up crap like the Lincoln Project
No it’s not. As you have said, party philosophy changes.
What is considered Republic/Democrat today is different from Republic/Democrat from 20-40 years ago.
Nothing wrong with wanting change.
Do you simply do not understand politics? Or party discipline? If the party becomes nothing but a herd of cats, nothing can be accomplished. And if you aren't in power, you accomplish much less than if you are.
This is not Great Britain. There are no wild-ass factions that can carve out their own little 5% and be effective.
Jolly,what I was thinking of was that the republican party of five years ago is probably different than the republican party of today.
Was President Trump responsible for that? Probably yes. Was he treasonous for trying to change the party? No, I don’t think so
There are current people within the Republican Party who don’t like the change. So they are going to change, or want to change what it has become. That is all
@taiwan_girl said in He's right.:
... the republican party of five years ago is probably different than the republican party of today.
Was President Trump responsible for that? Probably yes.
Yes, and yes.
Link to video
This is a nice illustration for both:
