Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Over/Under 210.5

Over/Under 210.5

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
50 Posts 7 Posters 811 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

    Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Loki
    wrote on last edited by Loki
    #36

    @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

    Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

    That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

    2022 has to be very very frightening.

    LuFins DadL taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
    • L Loki

      @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

      Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

      That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

      2022 has to be very very frightening.

      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by
      #37

      @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

      @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

      2022 has to be very very frightening.

      Especially considering Republicans control the majority of redistricting...

      The Brad

      1 Reply Last reply
      • L Loki

        @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

        Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

        That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

        2022 has to be very very frightening.

        taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girl
        wrote on last edited by
        #38

        @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

        @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

        Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

        That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

        2022 has to be very very frightening.

        Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

        He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

          @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

          @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

          Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

          That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

          2022 has to be very very frightening.

          Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

          He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Loki
          wrote on last edited by
          #39

          @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

          @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

          @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

          Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

          That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

          2022 has to be very very frightening.

          Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

          He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

          So the entire mainstream media for four years, the investigations and impeachment that the democrats ran, the threat to democracy, the implications of Russian agent, Kompromat and influence were all just Background noise and didn’t mean a thing?

          JollyJ taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
          • L Loki

            @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

            @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

            @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

            Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

            That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

            2022 has to be very very frightening.

            Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

            He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

            So the entire mainstream media for four years, the investigations and impeachment that the democrats ran, the threat to democracy, the implications of Russian agent, Kompromat and influence were all just Background noise and didn’t mean a thing?

            JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #40

            @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

            @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

            @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

            @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

            Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

            That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

            2022 has to be very very frightening.

            Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

            He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

            So the entire mainstream media for four years, the investigations and impeachment that the democrats ran, the threat to democracy, the implications of Russian agent, Kompromat and influence were all just Background noise and didn’t mean a thing?

            You forgot burying the Hunter Biden story (anybody still think Rudy was wrong on that one?) and totally ignoring Joe's cognitive decline or past voting record.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • L Loki

              @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

              @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

              @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

              Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

              That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

              2022 has to be very very frightening.

              Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

              He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

              So the entire mainstream media for four years, the investigations and impeachment that the democrats ran, the threat to democracy, the implications of Russian agent, Kompromat and influence were all just Background noise and didn’t mean a thing?

              taiwan_girlT Offline
              taiwan_girlT Offline
              taiwan_girl
              wrote on last edited by
              #41

              @loki oh they did have some effect, but don’t you think that president Trump made enough mistakes that even with all that, he could have won?

              In my mind, very few people based their vote (for example) on the impeachment hearing. I don’t think that had much of an effect on the “middle voters”.

              For those on the far sides of each party, that just made them stronger to vote either for/against President Trump. Those in the middle, not too much effect.

              For example, me. I am probably a little bit on the left side of center, but not too far. For the impeachment thing, I stated that President Trump probably offered something in return for something, but that is always done. I certainly didn’t think it was an impeachment. I’m guessing that a lot of people in the middle thought the same way.

              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                @loki oh they did have some effect, but don’t you think that president Trump made enough mistakes that even with all that, he could have won?

                In my mind, very few people based their vote (for example) on the impeachment hearing. I don’t think that had much of an effect on the “middle voters”.

                For those on the far sides of each party, that just made them stronger to vote either for/against President Trump. Those in the middle, not too much effect.

                For example, me. I am probably a little bit on the left side of center, but not too far. For the impeachment thing, I stated that President Trump probably offered something in return for something, but that is always done. I certainly didn’t think it was an impeachment. I’m guessing that a lot of people in the middle thought the same way.

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #42

                @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

                @loki oh they did have some effect, but don’t you think that president Trump made enough mistakes that even with all that, he could have won?

                In my mind, very few people based their vote (for example) on the impeachment hearing. I don’t think that had much of an effect on the “middle voters”.

                For those on the far sides of each party, that just made them stronger to vote either for/against President Trump. Those in the middle, not too much effect.

                For example, me. I am probably a little bit on the left side of center, but not too far. For the impeachment thing, I stated that President Trump probably offered something in return for something, but that is always done. I certainly didn’t think it was an impeachment. I’m guessing that a lot of people in the middle thought the same way.

                Some effect?

                Massive understatement, don't you think?

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

                  @loki oh they did have some effect, but don’t you think that president Trump made enough mistakes that even with all that, he could have won?

                  In my mind, very few people based their vote (for example) on the impeachment hearing. I don’t think that had much of an effect on the “middle voters”.

                  For those on the far sides of each party, that just made them stronger to vote either for/against President Trump. Those in the middle, not too much effect.

                  For example, me. I am probably a little bit on the left side of center, but not too far. For the impeachment thing, I stated that President Trump probably offered something in return for something, but that is always done. I certainly didn’t think it was an impeachment. I’m guessing that a lot of people in the middle thought the same way.

                  Some effect?

                  Massive understatement, don't you think?

                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #43

                  @jolly I don’t think so.

                  I don’t believe that your giving that middle 20 or 30 or 40% of the voters enough credit.

                  JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                    @jolly I don’t think so.

                    I don’t believe that your giving that middle 20 or 30 or 40% of the voters enough credit.

                    JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by Jolly
                    #44

                    @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

                    @jolly I don’t think so.

                    I don’t believe that your giving that middle 20 or 30 or 40% of the voters enough credit.

                    Ever talk to everyday people? Not the political junkies that hang around here, or the fringe 20% of either side, but average Americans that pay minimal attention to politics, except until within a month of the election?

                    Those guys get their info from the MSM and they don't generally fact check anything. A constant barrage of negative, biased reporting has a huge effect.

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                      #45

                      It’s finally final.

                      Claudia Tenney won the last undecided congressional race in the country on Friday after a judge ruled the New York Republican defeated incumbent Rep. Anthony Brindisi by a mere 109 votes in a race marred by months of legal challenges. Democrats’ advantage in the House is now 221 to 212.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        It’s finally final.

                        Claudia Tenney won the last undecided congressional race in the country on Friday after a judge ruled the New York Republican defeated incumbent Rep. Anthony Brindisi by a mere 109 votes in a race marred by months of legal challenges. Democrats’ advantage in the House is now 221 to 212.

                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins Dad
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #46

                        @jon-nyc said in Over/Under 210.5:

                        221 to 212.

                        233 means 2 vacancies. Letlow's seat (will eventually mean R-213) is one, what's the other one? And I assume this didn't include Wright?

                        The Brad

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #47

                          Wright news came out after. Plus he’s Ft Worth, one of the few Republican cities left in TX.

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                            Wright news came out after. Plus he’s Ft Worth, one of the few Republican cities left in TX.

                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #48

                            @jon-nyc said in Over/Under 210.5:

                            Wright news came out after. Plus he’s Ft Worth, one of the few Republican cities left in TX.

                            So what's the other vacant seat?

                            The Brad

                            LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                            • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                              @jon-nyc said in Over/Under 210.5:

                              Wright news came out after. Plus he’s Ft Worth, one of the few Republican cities left in TX.

                              So what's the other vacant seat?

                              LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins Dad
                              wrote on last edited by LuFins Dad
                              #49

                              @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                              @jon-nyc said in Over/Under 210.5:

                              Wright news came out after. Plus he’s Ft Worth, one of the few Republican cities left in TX.

                              So what's the other vacant seat?

                              I see, there are two seats in LA unfilled. Letlow and Richmond. It will likely put the final tally up one for both.

                              The Brad

                              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                @jon-nyc said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                Wright news came out after. Plus he’s Ft Worth, one of the few Republican cities left in TX.

                                So what's the other vacant seat?

                                I see, there are two seats in LA unfilled. Letlow and Richmond. It will likely put the final tally up one for both.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #50

                                @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                @jon-nyc said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                Wright news came out after. Plus he’s Ft Worth, one of the few Republican cities left in TX.

                                So what's the other vacant seat?

                                I see, there are two seats in LA unfilled. Letlow and Richmond. It will likely put the final tally up one for both.

                                Letlow's district is hugely Republican. Richmond represents New Orleans, typically very Democrat.

                                OTOH, Drew Brees is a Republican...Just sayin'...

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups