Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Over/Under 210.5

Over/Under 210.5

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
50 Posts 7 Posters 811 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on 14 Nov 2020, 19:26 last edited by
    #25

    Just checked out the details, votes can trickle in until the 17th as long as they're postmarked by Election Day.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • J jon-nyc
      14 Nov 2020, 19:23

      The official canvas is Tuesday. On the off chance you wish to be consistent in your decision making process as to when to call elections.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on 14 Nov 2020, 19:27 last edited by
      #26

      @jon-nyc said in Over/Under 210.5:

      The official canvas is Tuesday. On the off chance you wish to be consistent in your decision making process as to when to call elections.

      Sorry, must have been channeling a Democrat.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • L Offline
        L Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote on 14 Nov 2020, 23:52 last edited by
        #27

        The Republicans will add CA-21, CA-39, LA-5, NY-2, NY-11, NY-22, and UT-4. That puts them up to 211 by my count, and they are 50-50 (with slight leads) in CA-25 and Iowa 2. There are several more still uncalled in NY that I think goes Dem. 213 is a real possibility, though 212 is more likely.

        The Brad

        1 Reply Last reply
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on 15 Nov 2020, 01:04 last edited by
          #28

          So, predictions for Mid-terms?😄

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • L Offline
            L Offline
            LuFins Dad
            wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 16:51 last edited by
            #29

            Looks like it will be 213-214...

            The Brad

            G 1 Reply Last reply 24 Nov 2020, 18:17
            • L LuFins Dad
              24 Nov 2020, 16:51

              Looks like it will be 213-214...

              G Offline
              G Offline
              George K
              wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 18:17 last edited by George K
              #30

              @LuFins-Dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

              Looks like it will be 213-214...

              Where are you getting those numbers, LF'sD?

              Screen Shot 2020-11-24 at 12.17.53 PM.png

              You're saying the remains seats will all go GOP?

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              L 1 Reply Last reply 24 Nov 2020, 18:58
              • G George K
                24 Nov 2020, 18:17

                @LuFins-Dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                Looks like it will be 213-214...

                Where are you getting those numbers, LF'sD?

                Screen Shot 2020-11-24 at 12.17.53 PM.png

                You're saying the remains seats will all go GOP?

                L Offline
                L Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote on 24 Nov 2020, 18:58 last edited by
                #31

                @George-K I don’t know which seats Drcision Desk has called and which they haven’t, but CNN has it currently at 222-207, but the Republicans are ahead in CA-21, CA-25, LA-5 is a runoff between Republicans, NY-2, NY-11, and NY-22. Iowa is a dead heat...

                The Brad

                1 Reply Last reply
                • L Offline
                  L Offline
                  LuFins Dad
                  wrote on 1 Dec 2020, 08:11 last edited by
                  #32

                  213 and NY-22 is going through a Judicial Review after 2 lead changes in subsequent recounts. That would make 214.

                  The Brad

                  G 1 Reply Last reply 1 Dec 2020, 12:34
                  • L LuFins Dad
                    1 Dec 2020, 08:11

                    213 and NY-22 is going through a Judicial Review after 2 lead changes in subsequent recounts. That would make 214.

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on 1 Dec 2020, 12:34 last edited by
                    #33

                    @LuFins-Dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                    213 and NY-22 is going through a Judicial Review after 2 lead changes in subsequent recounts. That would make 214.

                    See @jolly sig line, LOL.

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 02:03 last edited by
                      #34

                      Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                      The Brad

                      HoraceH L 2 Replies Last reply 16 Dec 2020, 02:05
                      • L LuFins Dad
                        16 Dec 2020, 02:03

                        Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                        HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 02:05 last edited by
                        #35

                        @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                        Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                        So pathetic. I have no respect for anybody who holds with the side of any politician who contests election results. Democrats, you are LOSERS!

                        Education is extremely important.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • L LuFins Dad
                          16 Dec 2020, 02:03

                          Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Loki
                          wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 03:40 last edited by Loki
                          #36

                          @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                          Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                          That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                          2022 has to be very very frightening.

                          L taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply 16 Dec 2020, 03:58
                          • L Loki
                            16 Dec 2020, 03:40

                            @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                            Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                            That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                            2022 has to be very very frightening.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 03:58 last edited by
                            #37

                            @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

                            @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                            2022 has to be very very frightening.

                            Especially considering Republicans control the majority of redistricting...

                            The Brad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • L Loki
                              16 Dec 2020, 03:40

                              @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                              Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                              That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                              2022 has to be very very frightening.

                              taiwan_girlT Offline
                              taiwan_girlT Offline
                              taiwan_girl
                              wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 04:20 last edited by
                              #38

                              @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

                              @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                              Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                              That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                              2022 has to be very very frightening.

                              Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

                              He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply 16 Dec 2020, 04:28
                              • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl
                                16 Dec 2020, 04:20

                                @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                                2022 has to be very very frightening.

                                Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

                                He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Loki
                                wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 04:28 last edited by
                                #39

                                @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                                2022 has to be very very frightening.

                                Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

                                He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

                                So the entire mainstream media for four years, the investigations and impeachment that the democrats ran, the threat to democracy, the implications of Russian agent, Kompromat and influence were all just Background noise and didn’t mean a thing?

                                J taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply 16 Dec 2020, 04:41
                                • L Loki
                                  16 Dec 2020, 04:28

                                  @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                  @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                  @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                  Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                  That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                                  2022 has to be very very frightening.

                                  Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

                                  He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

                                  So the entire mainstream media for four years, the investigations and impeachment that the democrats ran, the threat to democracy, the implications of Russian agent, Kompromat and influence were all just Background noise and didn’t mean a thing?

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jolly
                                  wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 04:41 last edited by
                                  #40

                                  @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                  @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                  @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                  @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                  Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                  That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                                  2022 has to be very very frightening.

                                  Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

                                  He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

                                  So the entire mainstream media for four years, the investigations and impeachment that the democrats ran, the threat to democracy, the implications of Russian agent, Kompromat and influence were all just Background noise and didn’t mean a thing?

                                  You forgot burying the Hunter Biden story (anybody still think Rudy was wrong on that one?) and totally ignoring Joe's cognitive decline or past voting record.

                                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • L Loki
                                    16 Dec 2020, 04:28

                                    @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                    @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                    @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                    Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                    That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                                    2022 has to be very very frightening.

                                    Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

                                    He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

                                    So the entire mainstream media for four years, the investigations and impeachment that the democrats ran, the threat to democracy, the implications of Russian agent, Kompromat and influence were all just Background noise and didn’t mean a thing?

                                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                                    taiwan_girl
                                    wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 04:43 last edited by
                                    #41

                                    @loki oh they did have some effect, but don’t you think that president Trump made enough mistakes that even with all that, he could have won?

                                    In my mind, very few people based their vote (for example) on the impeachment hearing. I don’t think that had much of an effect on the “middle voters”.

                                    For those on the far sides of each party, that just made them stronger to vote either for/against President Trump. Those in the middle, not too much effect.

                                    For example, me. I am probably a little bit on the left side of center, but not too far. For the impeachment thing, I stated that President Trump probably offered something in return for something, but that is always done. I certainly didn’t think it was an impeachment. I’m guessing that a lot of people in the middle thought the same way.

                                    J 1 Reply Last reply 16 Dec 2020, 04:44
                                    • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl
                                      16 Dec 2020, 04:43

                                      @loki oh they did have some effect, but don’t you think that president Trump made enough mistakes that even with all that, he could have won?

                                      In my mind, very few people based their vote (for example) on the impeachment hearing. I don’t think that had much of an effect on the “middle voters”.

                                      For those on the far sides of each party, that just made them stronger to vote either for/against President Trump. Those in the middle, not too much effect.

                                      For example, me. I am probably a little bit on the left side of center, but not too far. For the impeachment thing, I stated that President Trump probably offered something in return for something, but that is always done. I certainly didn’t think it was an impeachment. I’m guessing that a lot of people in the middle thought the same way.

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Jolly
                                      wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 04:44 last edited by
                                      #42

                                      @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                      @loki oh they did have some effect, but don’t you think that president Trump made enough mistakes that even with all that, he could have won?

                                      In my mind, very few people based their vote (for example) on the impeachment hearing. I don’t think that had much of an effect on the “middle voters”.

                                      For those on the far sides of each party, that just made them stronger to vote either for/against President Trump. Those in the middle, not too much effect.

                                      For example, me. I am probably a little bit on the left side of center, but not too far. For the impeachment thing, I stated that President Trump probably offered something in return for something, but that is always done. I certainly didn’t think it was an impeachment. I’m guessing that a lot of people in the middle thought the same way.

                                      Some effect?

                                      Massive understatement, don't you think?

                                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                      taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply 16 Dec 2020, 04:51
                                      • J Jolly
                                        16 Dec 2020, 04:44

                                        @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                        @loki oh they did have some effect, but don’t you think that president Trump made enough mistakes that even with all that, he could have won?

                                        In my mind, very few people based their vote (for example) on the impeachment hearing. I don’t think that had much of an effect on the “middle voters”.

                                        For those on the far sides of each party, that just made them stronger to vote either for/against President Trump. Those in the middle, not too much effect.

                                        For example, me. I am probably a little bit on the left side of center, but not too far. For the impeachment thing, I stated that President Trump probably offered something in return for something, but that is always done. I certainly didn’t think it was an impeachment. I’m guessing that a lot of people in the middle thought the same way.

                                        Some effect?

                                        Massive understatement, don't you think?

                                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                                        taiwan_girl
                                        wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 04:51 last edited by
                                        #43

                                        @jolly I don’t think so.

                                        I don’t believe that your giving that middle 20 or 30 or 40% of the voters enough credit.

                                        J 1 Reply Last reply 16 Dec 2020, 04:56
                                        • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl
                                          16 Dec 2020, 04:51

                                          @jolly I don’t think so.

                                          I don’t believe that your giving that middle 20 or 30 or 40% of the voters enough credit.

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          Jolly
                                          wrote on 16 Dec 2020, 04:56 last edited by Jolly
                                          #44

                                          @taiwan_girl said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                          @jolly I don’t think so.

                                          I don’t believe that your giving that middle 20 or 30 or 40% of the voters enough credit.

                                          Ever talk to everyday people? Not the political junkies that hang around here, or the fringe 20% of either side, but average Americans that pay minimal attention to politics, except until within a month of the election?

                                          Those guys get their info from the MSM and they don't generally fact check anything. A constant barrage of negative, biased reporting has a huge effect.

                                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups