Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Over/Under 210.5

Over/Under 210.5

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
50 Posts 7 Posters 811 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    Oh yeah? Did Utah certify the vote? Or did the press call it? 😉

    JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @jon-nyc said in Over/Under 210.5:

    Oh yeah? Did Utah certify the vote? Or did the press call it? 😉

    100% vote.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      Nope. It's a press call.

      Fox called it:

      Screen Shot 2020-11-14 at 2.14.31 PM.png

      AP still hasn't

      Screen Shot 2020-11-14 at 2.16.00 PM.png

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        Owens won UT4, and Biden won US President.

        Fox has spoken.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          I take that back. Neither Fox nor AP nor RCP has called it.

          Where did you read it was called?

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            I take that back. Neither Fox nor AP nor RCP has called it.

            Where did you read it was called?

            JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            @jon-nyc said in Over/Under 210.5:

            I take that back. Neither Fox nor AP nor RCP has called it.

            Where did you read it was called?

            Heard it in passing on the radio...

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              The official canvas is Tuesday. On the off chance you wish to be consistent in your decision making process as to when to call elections.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                Just checked out the details, votes can trickle in until the 17th as long as they're postmarked by Election Day.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  The official canvas is Tuesday. On the off chance you wish to be consistent in your decision making process as to when to call elections.

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  @jon-nyc said in Over/Under 210.5:

                  The official canvas is Tuesday. On the off chance you wish to be consistent in your decision making process as to when to call elections.

                  Sorry, must have been channeling a Democrat.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    The Republicans will add CA-21, CA-39, LA-5, NY-2, NY-11, NY-22, and UT-4. That puts them up to 211 by my count, and they are 50-50 (with slight leads) in CA-25 and Iowa 2. There are several more still uncalled in NY that I think goes Dem. 213 is a real possibility, though 212 is more likely.

                    The Brad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      So, predictions for Mid-terms?😄

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins Dad
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        Looks like it will be 213-214...

                        The Brad

                        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                        • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                          Looks like it will be 213-214...

                          George KG Offline
                          George KG Offline
                          George K
                          wrote on last edited by George K
                          #30

                          @LuFins-Dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                          Looks like it will be 213-214...

                          Where are you getting those numbers, LF'sD?

                          Screen Shot 2020-11-24 at 12.17.53 PM.png

                          You're saying the remains seats will all go GOP?

                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                          LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                          • George KG George K

                            @LuFins-Dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                            Looks like it will be 213-214...

                            Where are you getting those numbers, LF'sD?

                            Screen Shot 2020-11-24 at 12.17.53 PM.png

                            You're saying the remains seats will all go GOP?

                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            @George-K I don’t know which seats Drcision Desk has called and which they haven’t, but CNN has it currently at 222-207, but the Republicans are ahead in CA-21, CA-25, LA-5 is a runoff between Republicans, NY-2, NY-11, and NY-22. Iowa is a dead heat...

                            The Brad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins Dad
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              213 and NY-22 is going through a Judicial Review after 2 lead changes in subsequent recounts. That would make 214.

                              The Brad

                              George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                              • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                213 and NY-22 is going through a Judicial Review after 2 lead changes in subsequent recounts. That would make 214.

                                George KG Offline
                                George KG Offline
                                George K
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                @LuFins-Dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                213 and NY-22 is going through a Judicial Review after 2 lead changes in subsequent recounts. That would make 214.

                                See @jolly sig line, LOL.

                                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins Dad
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #34

                                  Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                  The Brad

                                  HoraceH L 2 Replies Last reply
                                  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                    Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                    HoraceH Offline
                                    HoraceH Offline
                                    Horace
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                    Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                    So pathetic. I have no respect for anybody who holds with the side of any politician who contests election results. Democrats, you are LOSERS!

                                    Education is extremely important.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                      Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Loki
                                      wrote on last edited by Loki
                                      #36

                                      @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                      Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                      That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                                      2022 has to be very very frightening.

                                      LuFins DadL taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
                                      • L Loki

                                        @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                        Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                        That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                                        2022 has to be very very frightening.

                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins Dad
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #37

                                        @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                        @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                        2022 has to be very very frightening.

                                        Especially considering Republicans control the majority of redistricting...

                                        The Brad

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • L Loki

                                          @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                          Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                          That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                                          2022 has to be very very frightening.

                                          taiwan_girlT Offline
                                          taiwan_girlT Offline
                                          taiwan_girl
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #38

                                          @loki said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                          @lufins-dad said in Over/Under 210.5:

                                          Officially 213 - 222 with NY22 still in recount (Republican up by 12) BUT even though Iowa 2 had been certified by the state (Republican won), the Democrat loser is contesting the results directly to the House and Nancy Pelosi.

                                          That’s still a shocking result. Four years of blitzkreig and look at what almost happened and they still drink their own bath water.

                                          2022 has to be very very frightening.

                                          Not sure it is so shocking. I think that the election was President Trumps to lose. The election was not so much people voting against the Republic party, but people voting against President Trump.

                                          He really has no one to blame but himself. If he was less acting like “Trump” and more “presidential”, I think he would have won.

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups