Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. What happens when the demand for voter fraud greatly exceeds the supply?

What happens when the demand for voter fraud greatly exceeds the supply?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
13 Posts 7 Posters 108 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AxtremusA Offline
    AxtremusA Offline
    Axtremus
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Will Partick still pay out the reward money if the convicted voter fraud case is that of a voter committing voter fraud to benefit Trump?

    1 Reply Last reply
    • kluursK Offline
      kluursK Offline
      kluurs
      wrote on last edited by kluurs
      #3

      Here's what a search came up with for the 2016 election - seems a bit light. This election would certainly have some suspect votes. One of the predictable things is that when people can vote early, is that they can pass away prior to the date of the election. Not 3,000 of them - but some number. I wouldn't call that fraud but state election law should address whether the vote is considered or not. It will take a bit more time for states to review, recount, reassess - and then certify their election results. I hope things can calm down a bit. It's been a wee bit too crazy so far.

      Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        I’m sure the words “up to” are doing yeoman’s work in that offer.

        "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
        -Cormac McCarthy

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          So...It's ok if Bloomie dumps a fortune into Florida to try to get his way, but it's not ok for somebidy else to spend money on what they want?

          Ok...

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            I didn’t say it’s not ok. My point was about how scarce evidence for fraud combined with exceptional demand has driven up its price.

            Econ 101, man.

            "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
            -Cormac McCarthy

            1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by Jolly
              #7

              Depends on your intended target.

              Years back, I knew a bagman who had worked for the Long Machine. His job was to pass out the cash or whatever it took to buy votes. His best purchase was an entire family for a pair of rubber boots.

              Or, you can just by wholesale. A common tactic is to bring a paper bag with small denomination bills to a black pastor and have him lead his flock to the correct voting conclusions.

              Of course it's about economics...

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • kluursK Offline
                kluursK Offline
                kluurs
                wrote on last edited by kluurs
                #8

                It has been suggested that the intended goal of the litigation and public pressure is to try and ensure that no candidate reachers 270 electoral votes. In that instance, the House of Representatives elects the President from the 3 Presidential candidates who received the most electoral votes. Each State delegation has one vote and it is up to the individual States to determine how to vote. Since there are more Republican states than Democrat, some surmise this is a strategy for assuring a DJT second term.

                JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • kluursK kluurs

                  Here's what a search came up with for the 2016 election - seems a bit light. This election would certainly have some suspect votes. One of the predictable things is that when people can vote early, is that they can pass away prior to the date of the election. Not 3,000 of them - but some number. I wouldn't call that fraud but state election law should address whether the vote is considered or not. It will take a bit more time for states to review, recount, reassess - and then certify their election results. I hope things can calm down a bit. It's been a wee bit too crazy so far.

                  Catseye3C Offline
                  Catseye3C Offline
                  Catseye3
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @kluurs said in What happens when the demand for voter fraud greatly exceeds the supply?:

                  state election law should address whether the vote is considered or not.

                  What an interesting question. What do you think?

                  Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                  MikM 1 Reply Last reply
                  • kluursK kluurs

                    It has been suggested that the intended goal of the litigation and public pressure is to try and ensure that no candidate reachers 270 electoral votes. In that instance, the House of Representatives elects the President from the 3 Presidential candidates who received the most electoral votes. Each State delegation has one vote and it is up to the individual States to determine how to vote. Since there are more Republican states than Democrat, some surmise this is a strategy for assuring a DJT second term.

                    JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @kluurs said in What happens when the demand for voter fraud greatly exceeds the supply?:

                    It has been suggested that the intended goal of the litigation and public pressure is to try and ensure that no candidate reachers 270 electoral votes. In that instance, the House of Representatives elects the President from the 3 Presidential candidates who received the most electoral votes. Each State delegation has one vote and it is up to the individual States to determine how to vote. Since there are more Republican states than Democrat, some surmise this is a strategy for assuring a DJT second term.

                    It's been suggested, but I don't think that's a goal...

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • Catseye3C Catseye3

                      @kluurs said in What happens when the demand for voter fraud greatly exceeds the supply?:

                      state election law should address whether the vote is considered or not.

                      What an interesting question. What do you think?

                      MikM Offline
                      MikM Offline
                      Mik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      @Catseye3 said in What happens when the demand for voter fraud greatly exceeds the supply?:

                      @kluurs said in What happens when the demand for voter fraud greatly exceeds the supply?:

                      state election law should address whether the vote is considered or not.

                      What an interesting question. What do you think?

                      I think if you vote early and then pass away ythe vote should stand. To try to check every vote against the death rolls would be burdensome when the volume should be minimal. It should be easier to take a look at the improbably old voters. It would also be easier if voter rolls were properly maintained.

                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Offline
                        AxtremusA Offline
                        Axtremus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/11/10/gop-list-of-alleged-voter-fraud-nevada-contains-hundreds-of-military-addresses.html
                        — — — —
                        A letter sent Nov. 5 on behalf of President Donald Trump's reelection campaign to Attorney General William Barr alleges that 3,062 voters who do not live in the state of Nevada "improperly cast" absentee ballots in the 2020 election.

                        But the list that accompanies the letter of those accused of "criminal voter fraud" contains hundreds of overseas military post office boxes and more than 1,000 locations where military personnel are stationed, such as Minot, North Dakota; Edwards and Fort Irwin, California; Hill Air Force Base, Utah; Carlisle, Pennsylvania; and Yuma, Arizona.
                        — — — —

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • LarryL Offline
                          LarryL Offline
                          Larry
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Link to video

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups