Trump lawsuits
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 14:18 last edited by
Bwahahahahaaaaaaa
It's coming... I'm going to enjoy watching it.......
BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 14:19 last edited by
Rudy is delusional. The wording of the federal judge was so blatant it might not even get past a circuit appeal let alone get to SCOTUS.
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 14:20 last edited by
Bahahahaaaaaaa
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 14:31 last edited by
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 14:36 last edited by
Scotus will deny cert.
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 14:38 last edited by
It's coming............
I can't wait.......
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 14:42 last edited by
The bigger your anticipation, the worse your disappointment is gonna feel
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 14:57 last edited by
I'm not the one who's going to get gutted.....l
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 14:59 last edited by
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 16:05 last edited by
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 16:10 last edited by
-
Seems you Trump haters may have to eat crow soon.....
Link to videowrote on 22 Nov 2020, 16:12 last edited by xenon@Larry said in Trump lawsuits:
Seems you Trump haters may have to eat crow soon.....
Link to videoInteresting. You rail against media bias, but post falun gong content.
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 16:21 last edited by
I guess you bought into the communist party's propaganda about them being bad old boogeyman, huh....
-
I guess you bought into the communist party's propaganda about them being bad old boogeyman, huh....
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 16:29 last edited by xenon@Larry said in Trump lawsuits:
I guess you bought into the communist party's propaganda about them being bad old boogeyman, huh....
I don’t care what their views are, it’s weird to listen to media arms of political organizations. Especially political organizations with no grounding in the same values as you.
Listen to Ben Shapiro’s latest podcast. He did a better breakdown of the press conference. (And he’s a Trump voter, so no “TDS”)
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 16:40 last edited by
You're of the opinion that felon gong is a political organization? Lol
Tell you what - check the veracity of their reporting instead of attacking the messenger.
-
You're of the opinion that felon gong is a political organization? Lol
Tell you what - check the veracity of their reporting instead of attacking the messenger.
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 16:48 last edited by@Larry said in Trump lawsuits:
You're of the opinion that felon gong is a political organization? Lol
Tell you what - check the veracity of their reporting instead of attacking the messenger.
I listened to as much I could. It’s prime grade A bullshit.
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 16:51 last edited by xenon
@Larry On Falun Gong - I grew up in the city with the largest Chinese diaspora in North America. So I understand politics in China a bit.
Falun Gong is kinda analogous to Scientology. So if that’s your scene, more power to you.
Just because they’re anti-CCP doesn’t make them great.
Oh and their leader has super powers.
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 16:53 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:
David Frum provides more interesting quotes for the PA decision in this thread.
So far it’s as evidence free as Bridgegate. But did it do anything to stop seemingly rational people from chortling and promoting the ideas that never made contact with reality? People really really need to be more introspective before they starting believing their own high and mighty bullshit.
-
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 17:00 last edited by
Bridgegate wasn’t evidence free. Kelly’s conviction was overturned because of legal technicalities.
Your constant attempts at whattaboutism are bound to come up dry. No president has ever tried to openly subvert an election before.
I guess you could go back to 1876, but that’s a little complicated given what the Rebs were doing on the ground.
-
Bridgegate wasn’t evidence free. Kelly’s conviction was overturned because of legal technicalities.
Your constant attempts at whattaboutism are bound to come up dry. No president has ever tried to openly subvert an election before.
I guess you could go back to 1876, but that’s a little complicated given what the Rebs were doing on the ground.
wrote on 22 Nov 2020, 17:21 last edited by Loki@jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:
Bridgegate wasn’t evidence free. Kelly’s conviction was overturned because of legal technicalities.
Your constant attempts at whattaboutism are bound to come up dry. No president has ever tried to openly subvert an election before.
I guess you could go back to 1876, but that’s a little complicated given what the Rebs were doing on the ground.
Jon. The last four years society’s norms have been so violated for you to call out something as new is just ridiculous. This is the reality that was created and now you are living it.
This is the norm, the media and the dems built the game board. Attack at all costs no matter what the norms were.
A price is being paid for all the assault and insults levied to about half the population. It is very significant and not okay. It’s not funny at all and not acceptable what the main stream media has done and to say nothing to see here, it was all normal fine and good...well I’m sorry it was a house of your own creation that you now live in.