Can we at least end one narrative?
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
The radicals' behavior, and more specifically the general acceptance of their behavior, paves the way for the more pedestrian uses of social despotism. As I said, the folks I've worked with are far from radicals. But it's from liberal radicals that they got their ideas.
Outrage culture is bullshit, we should fight it.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
But today, it's not just my work experiences that are problematic. Being grateful for the existence of a police force means you hate blacks. Worrying about a white boy's self-esteem in school means you're an asshole who hates women and minorities. Believing Nick Sandmann isn't a racist means you're obviously one yourself. If you question the validity of university tribunals that don't follow the rule of law, well obviously you're just pro-rape.
SJW liberals reject the very concept of diversity of opinion, and you're wrong if you think the above sentiments haven't bled out into the mild-mannered majority. That's precisely where I'm hearing this shit from because as I said, I don't know that many militant liberals. From the family, friends, fellow nerd enthusiasts and professional contacts I converse with on social media, these opinions are unavoidable. Hell I stopped participating in a D&D group because I was tired of the DM virtue signaling to everyone that as a white male he has a lot to be sorry for just to keep his wife happy. It was disgusting. I'll stick with my irreverent assholes who smoke up too much, please.
I agree with what much of what you're saying, though I think there is a distinction between claiming on the one hand that there is a set of ill-liberal ideas that are a component of the current political zeitgeist, and that are having impact in the wider population - a claim I would agree with, and on the other your original claim that a significant chunk of the population are completely bound up in this SJW identity thing. A significant chunk are influenced but surely only a small set are true ideologues.
So yeah, I'm officially diagnosing this as a fucking problem. I'm against the idea of people facing social, financial, or professional consequences for their political beliefs, and I care about that more than I do any one political platform. I'm for diversity of opinion, so I very much want there to be one even if I disagree with it.
I agree completely. Though I don't understand why you think Trump would help this situation. He's just fuel for the fire. I rather like the fact that Biden is a rather boring politician.
For me, the focus should no longer be political views themselves. The battle of ideas should become secondary. The very idea of politics as the act of trying to convince people that some set of ideas regarding the running of a nation are manifestly better/worse than others should lose potency. We need more regulation/less regulation, we need more taxes less taxes, more public services less public services. X set of moral values and/or groups need provision of special protections/stripped of special protections. All this should be secondary now. Money, time and effort should go towards the restoration of political discourse. We should have microtargetted facebook adverts that are aimed at convicing people that others with different political views are not the enemy. We should employ an armada of anti-trolls crossing social and cultural divides to write comments espousing common humanity in youtube videos and in the comments to news articles.
@Moonbat said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
We should have microtargetted facebook adverts that are aimed at convicing people that others with different political views are not the enemy. We should employ an armada of anti-trolls crossing social and cultural divides to write comments espousing common humanity in youtube videos and in the comments to news articles.
I absolutely agree but there's no money in it. There's massive money to be made by ginning up controversy, though, so that's what we have.
Cracked is an internet footnote now precisely because it didn't get on the Trump content train. They completely admit this as a mistake. Meanwhile, CNN is hanging on because getting people terrified is a great way to keep them glued to the screen.
-
Thank you for explaining your perspective. I appreciate it.
Also - this has been fun! Nice to talk you all (or at least a small number of you) again.
@Moonbat said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
Thank you for explaining your perspective. I appreciate it.
Also - this has been fun! Nice to talk you all (or at least a small number of you) again.
Stick around man!
(...you don't do D&D by any chance, do you?)
-
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
That's why this shit is almost certainly not going to stop with Trump out of office. ...
Ending it will not, most probably. But do you think the magnitude of it will be the same? The perspective over here is that Trump is a very polarizing person, not doing any effort at all to bring the two sides in your country together. And he leans pretty heavily towards the conservative side, which makes his difference with the left media's viewpoints pretty big. This also means that in this case they can score pretty successfully any time they publish something anti-trump, because there's a big enough group of people that think they are right to do so. If after the election Biden is president, and still they will attack people with a conservative but more moderate viewpoint (or perhaps Trump-like people who are not so much in the spotlights purely for the sake of being able to continue; thereby I must also admit I do not know who this Nick Sandman is), with the same intensity as they did with Trump, surely they will not have as much success with that? Given some time, I do think the overall tone in the media would become more moderate if eventually it's Biden who gets elected.
To me it mainly seems like action-reaction to me. Trump is very far to the right and speaks out strongly against many (if not most) things posted by the left media. It seems only logical that they respond to that (irregardless of who is right). With this, I do not want to say anything about how it all got started, or who caused it. Don't have a good view on that.With that in mind, I would love to see what the left media would do with a moderate Republican president in more quiet times (e.g. without global pandemics in the case of Trump, or without terrorist attacks and wars as was the case with Bush Jr.). Equally curious now how Fox News and other right-leaning media will treat Biden, though.
A few points...Trump is not an ultra-conservative. Never has been. Especially not a fiscal conservative.
Bush 43? I remember the media being much tougher on him before 9/11, than on Obama. Trump just accelerated an already existing trend.
Nick Sandman? You really need to do some background reading. I think it will bring some clarity to the current state of the media.
Lastly, do you realize almost half the country voted for Trump? And I mean voted for. Probably about 75% of the votes he received were from people who liked his policies and political views. Those people still exist today.
Re-education and coercion by the MSM will continue. Ueber allen!
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
A few points...Trump is not an ultra-conservative. Never has been. Especially not a fiscal conservative.
Bush 43? I remember the media being much tougher on him before 9/11, than on Obama. Trump just accelerated an already existing trend.
Nick Sandman? You really need to do some background reading. I think it will bring some clarity to the current state of the media.
Lastly, do you realize almost half the country voted for Trump? And I mean voted for. Probably about 75% of the votes he received were from people who liked his policies and political views. Those people still exist today.
Re-education and coercion by the MSM will continue. Ueber allen!
I checked out the Nick Sandmann case, and yes obviously that seems to be an instance of completely unacceptable and dishonest journalism.
Yes, I do realize almost half of those who voted, voted for Trump. This is something that I do find puzzling. There's a lot about this man to dislike, and it doesn't surprise me in the least that many people really hate him. And when you hate him, it is of course very difficult to have sympathy for those who voted for him.
On the other hand, whereas I would never vote for him, I do understand why other people voted for him over Clinton. I even get how he got through the primaries in 2016. He was something different, seemed refreshing and worth giving a try. Someone who would really shake things up (Drain the swamp!). And it seems like he did shake things up! But in a way that did not do your country much good in my opinion. And now it seems like all reason has left both sides and you're all blaming each other (although I believe - and hope - that my perception of the magnitude of it, is way overestimated due to how the media reports this).
And so, the left hates the right for voting for the guy they hate, and the right hates the left because of it. So the right continues to vote for Trump, and the left continues to hate the right for it. But four more years of this guy are not going to improve this in my opinion. He may be good for the economy and have certain policies that the right likes (hell, he may even have policies that the left likes), but that man is not made to keep a country together. The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Anyway, I can only look at this from far away through the eyes of our media and hope everything is not as heated in the US as they make it seem.
-
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
The problem in the black community left racism behind a long time ago. The reason that the black community has higher crime rates, lower literacy, lower wealth and are worse off by many metrics, is because Father's Day is the most confusing day of the year in most inner city black communities.
Racism does not make 77% of black mothers give birth to illegitimate children. Racism does not create a culture, where education is not valued and children are urged to act stupidly in class, in order to get a "crazy check". Racism does not make black women abort 27.1% of their babies (and Sanger smiled). Racism does not stand in the HR office and deny black applicants decent jobs...In fact, most businesses would fight over a well-qualified black applicant.
Opportunity is rampant in America for black people. they just need to take advantage of it.We as a society have bent over backwards to provide that opportunity, so much so, that many very bright and prosperous black people complain there is now a taint on their accomplishments...A perception they have become what they are through lowered standards and preference.Culture is heritable, wealth is heritable, preference for education is heritable. These things don't come out of a vacuum. You cannot pretend that the culture of today is not a function of the environment of yesterday.
I tend to agree that social policies that focus primarily on quotas and explicit handouts are not likely to achieve much and that truly raising the standard of living of a population of people is a difficult thing. Never the less collectively America has failed spectacularly at this.
@Moonbat said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
The problem in the black community left racism behind a long time ago. The reason that the black community has higher crime rates, lower literacy, lower wealth and are worse off by many metrics, is because Father's Day is the most confusing day of the year in most inner city black communities.
Racism does not make 77% of black mothers give birth to illegitimate children. Racism does not create a culture, where education is not valued and children are urged to act stupidly in class, in order to get a "crazy check". Racism does not make black women abort 27.1% of their babies (and Sanger smiled). Racism does not stand in the HR office and deny black applicants decent jobs...In fact, most businesses would fight over a well-qualified black applicant.
Opportunity is rampant in America for black people. they just need to take advantage of it.We as a society have bent over backwards to provide that opportunity, so much so, that many very bright and prosperous black people complain there is now a taint on their accomplishments...A perception they have become what they are through lowered standards and preference.Culture is heritable, wealth is heritable, preference for education is heritable. These things don't come out of a vacuum. You cannot pretend that the culture of today is not a function of the environment of yesterday.
I tend to agree that social policies that focus primarily on quotas and explicit handouts are not likely to achieve much and that truly raising the standard of living of a population of people is a difficult thing. Never the less collectively America has failed spectacularly at this.
There was somebody who raised the standard of living for many blacks. More than that standard had been raised in many years.
His name is Donald J. Trump.
-
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
A few points...Trump is not an ultra-conservative. Never has been. Especially not a fiscal conservative.
Bush 43? I remember the media being much tougher on him before 9/11, than on Obama. Trump just accelerated an already existing trend.
Nick Sandman? You really need to do some background reading. I think it will bring some clarity to the current state of the media.
Lastly, do you realize almost half the country voted for Trump? And I mean voted for. Probably about 75% of the votes he received were from people who liked his policies and political views. Those people still exist today.
Re-education and coercion by the MSM will continue. Ueber allen!
I checked out the Nick Sandmann case, and yes obviously that seems to be an instance of completely unacceptable and dishonest journalism.
Yes, I do realize almost half of those who voted, voted for Trump. This is something that I do find puzzling. There's a lot about this man to dislike, and it doesn't surprise me in the least that many people really hate him. And when you hate him, it is of course very difficult to have sympathy for those who voted for him.
On the other hand, whereas I would never vote for him, I do understand why other people voted for him over Clinton. I even get how he got through the primaries in 2016. He was something different, seemed refreshing and worth giving a try. Someone who would really shake things up (Drain the swamp!). And it seems like he did shake things up! But in a way that did not do your country much good in my opinion. And now it seems like all reason has left both sides and you're all blaming each other (although I believe - and hope - that my perception of the magnitude of it, is way overestimated due to how the media reports this).
And so, the left hates the right for voting for the guy they hate, and the right hates the left because of it. So the right continues to vote for Trump, and the left continues to hate the right for it. But four more years of this guy are not going to improve this in my opinion. He may be good for the economy and have certain policies that the right likes (hell, he may even have policies that the left likes), but that man is not made to keep a country together. The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Anyway, I can only look at this from far away through the eyes of our media and hope everything is not as heated in the US as they make it seem.
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
A few points...Trump is not an ultra-conservative. Never has been. Especially not a fiscal conservative.
Bush 43? I remember the media being much tougher on him before 9/11, than on Obama. Trump just accelerated an already existing trend.
Nick Sandman? You really need to do some background reading. I think it will bring some clarity to the current state of the media.
Lastly, do you realize almost half the country voted for Trump? And I mean voted for. Probably about 75% of the votes he received were from people who liked his policies and political views. Those people still exist today.
Re-education and coercion by the MSM will continue. Ueber allen!
I checked out the Nick Sandmann case, and yes obviously that seems to be an instance of completely unacceptable and dishonest journalism.
Yes, I do realize almost half of those who voted, voted for Trump. This is something that I do find puzzling. There's a lot about this man to dislike, and it doesn't surprise me in the least that many people really hate him. And when you hate him, it is of course very difficult to have sympathy for those who voted for him.
On the other hand, whereas I would never vote for him, I do understand why other people voted for him over Clinton. I even get how he got through the primaries in 2016. He was something different, seemed refreshing and worth giving a try. Someone who would really shake things up (Drain the swamp!). And it seems like he did shake things up! But in a way that did not do your country much good in my opinion. And now it seems like all reason has left both sides and you're all blaming each other (although I believe - and hope - that my perception of the magnitude of it, is way overestimated due to how the media reports this).
And so, the left hates the right for voting for the guy they hate, and the right hates the left because of it. So the right continues to vote for Trump, and the left continues to hate the right for it. But four more years of this guy are not going to improve this in my opinion. He may be good for the economy and have certain policies that the right likes (hell, he may even have policies that the left likes), but that man is not made to keep a country together. The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Anyway, I can only look at this from far away through the eyes of our media and hope everything is not as heated in the US as they make it seem.
I don't think you realize the disdain and disgust the Left in America feels for people on the Right. The Basket of Deplorables.
Biden will not improve this. Harris will accelerate it, when she becomes President.
-
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
A few points...Trump is not an ultra-conservative. Never has been. Especially not a fiscal conservative.
Bush 43? I remember the media being much tougher on him before 9/11, than on Obama. Trump just accelerated an already existing trend.
Nick Sandman? You really need to do some background reading. I think it will bring some clarity to the current state of the media.
Lastly, do you realize almost half the country voted for Trump? And I mean voted for. Probably about 75% of the votes he received were from people who liked his policies and political views. Those people still exist today.
Re-education and coercion by the MSM will continue. Ueber allen!
I checked out the Nick Sandmann case, and yes obviously that seems to be an instance of completely unacceptable and dishonest journalism.
Yes, I do realize almost half of those who voted, voted for Trump. This is something that I do find puzzling. There's a lot about this man to dislike, and it doesn't surprise me in the least that many people really hate him. And when you hate him, it is of course very difficult to have sympathy for those who voted for him.
On the other hand, whereas I would never vote for him, I do understand why other people voted for him over Clinton. I even get how he got through the primaries in 2016. He was something different, seemed refreshing and worth giving a try. Someone who would really shake things up (Drain the swamp!). And it seems like he did shake things up! But in a way that did not do your country much good in my opinion. And now it seems like all reason has left both sides and you're all blaming each other (although I believe - and hope - that my perception of the magnitude of it, is way overestimated due to how the media reports this).
And so, the left hates the right for voting for the guy they hate, and the right hates the left because of it. So the right continues to vote for Trump, and the left continues to hate the right for it. But four more years of this guy are not going to improve this in my opinion. He may be good for the economy and have certain policies that the right likes (hell, he may even have policies that the left likes), but that man is not made to keep a country together. The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Anyway, I can only look at this from far away through the eyes of our media and hope everything is not as heated in the US as they make it seem.
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Speak on, brother.
As Trump recedes in the rearview, the perception of his influence will change. Less frenzy, more analysis, without him around to keep the waters roiled.
-
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Speak on, brother.
As Trump recedes in the rearview, the perception of his influence will change. Less frenzy, more analysis, without him around to keep the waters roiled.
@Catseye3 said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Speak on, brother.
As Trump recedes in the rearview, the perception of his influence will change. Less frenzy, more analysis, without him around to keep the waters roiled.
That makes sense cat’s-eye and @Nunatax
-
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Speak on, brother.
As Trump recedes in the rearview, the perception of his influence will change. Less frenzy, more analysis, without him around to keep the waters roiled.
@Catseye3 said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Speak on, brother.
As Trump recedes in the rearview, the perception of his influence will change. Less frenzy, more analysis, without him around to keep the waters roiled.
Trump News Network
-
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
A few points...Trump is not an ultra-conservative. Never has been. Especially not a fiscal conservative.
Bush 43? I remember the media being much tougher on him before 9/11, than on Obama. Trump just accelerated an already existing trend.
Nick Sandman? You really need to do some background reading. I think it will bring some clarity to the current state of the media.
Lastly, do you realize almost half the country voted for Trump? And I mean voted for. Probably about 75% of the votes he received were from people who liked his policies and political views. Those people still exist today.
Re-education and coercion by the MSM will continue. Ueber allen!
I checked out the Nick Sandmann case, and yes obviously that seems to be an instance of completely unacceptable and dishonest journalism.
Yes, I do realize almost half of those who voted, voted for Trump. This is something that I do find puzzling. There's a lot about this man to dislike, and it doesn't surprise me in the least that many people really hate him. And when you hate him, it is of course very difficult to have sympathy for those who voted for him.
On the other hand, whereas I would never vote for him, I do understand why other people voted for him over Clinton. I even get how he got through the primaries in 2016. He was something different, seemed refreshing and worth giving a try. Someone who would really shake things up (Drain the swamp!). And it seems like he did shake things up! But in a way that did not do your country much good in my opinion. And now it seems like all reason has left both sides and you're all blaming each other (although I believe - and hope - that my perception of the magnitude of it, is way overestimated due to how the media reports this).
And so, the left hates the right for voting for the guy they hate, and the right hates the left because of it. So the right continues to vote for Trump, and the left continues to hate the right for it. But four more years of this guy are not going to improve this in my opinion. He may be good for the economy and have certain policies that the right likes (hell, he may even have policies that the left likes), but that man is not made to keep a country together. The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Anyway, I can only look at this from far away through the eyes of our media and hope everything is not as heated in the US as they make it seem.
I don't think you realize the disdain and disgust the Left in America feels for people on the Right. The Basket of Deplorables.
Biden will not improve this. Harris will accelerate it, when she becomes President.
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
I don't think you realize the disdain and disgust the Left in America feels for people on the Right. The Basket of Deplorables.
Biden will not improve this. Harris will accelerate it, when she becomes President.
Well, it's hard to get a feeling for the level of disdain that the left feels for the right from so far away. But from what Aqua has described, it seems like there is indeed a real problem there. To me this seems like the action-reaction I described earlier, given that Trump is quite a controversial man to say the least. At the same time, I also think Trump just made this speed up (I see him as a symptom, not really a root cause). Over the years I have come to realize that on many topics there hardly seems to be a middle road in the US. I wonder if this is because of the two party system. Every country has nutjobs that hold extreme views. They can usually join political parties that never really stand a chance against the more moderate ones. But when there's only two parties (and an independent option that no one really seems to care about), they don't have anywhere else to go. In elections in which literally every vote counts, neither side wants to alienate these people. That makes them feel empowered and off it goes, pretty extreme and often ridiculous ideas start to get normalized and find more and more traction.
You could be right that Biden is not going to improve things and I don't know about Harris (simply don't know her well enough). It could very well still get worse. But I really doubt that a 4 year Biden presidency would come even close to doing the damage that four more years of Trump would do. And if after these 4 years there's a need to elect a republican again, I'm sure that that is what will happen. I do hope the choice will be made for a moderate one who at least tries to bring the two sides together.
-
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
I don't think you realize the disdain and disgust the Left in America feels for people on the Right. The Basket of Deplorables.
Biden will not improve this. Harris will accelerate it, when she becomes President.
Well, it's hard to get a feeling for the level of disdain that the left feels for the right from so far away. But from what Aqua has described, it seems like there is indeed a real problem there. To me this seems like the action-reaction I described earlier, given that Trump is quite a controversial man to say the least. At the same time, I also think Trump just made this speed up (I see him as a symptom, not really a root cause). Over the years I have come to realize that on many topics there hardly seems to be a middle road in the US. I wonder if this is because of the two party system. Every country has nutjobs that hold extreme views. They can usually join political parties that never really stand a chance against the more moderate ones. But when there's only two parties (and an independent option that no one really seems to care about), they don't have anywhere else to go. In elections in which literally every vote counts, neither side wants to alienate these people. That makes them feel empowered and off it goes, pretty extreme and often ridiculous ideas start to get normalized and find more and more traction.
You could be right that Biden is not going to improve things and I don't know about Harris (simply don't know her well enough). It could very well still get worse. But I really doubt that a 4 year Biden presidency would come even close to doing the damage that four more years of Trump would do. And if after these 4 years there's a need to elect a republican again, I'm sure that that is what will happen. I do hope the choice will be made for a moderate one who at least tries to bring the two sides together.
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
I don't think you realize the disdain and disgust the Left in America feels for people on the Right. The Basket of Deplorables.
Biden will not improve this. Harris will accelerate it, when she becomes President.
Well, it's hard to get a feeling for the level of disdain that the left feels for the right from so far away. But from what Aqua has described, it seems like there is indeed a real problem there. To me this seems like the action-reaction I described earlier, given that Trump is quite a controversial man to say the least. At the same time, I also think Trump just made this speed up (I see him as a symptom, not really a root cause). Over the years I have come to realize that on many topics there hardly seems to be a middle road in the US. I wonder if this is because of the two party system. Every country has nutjobs that hold extreme views. They can usually join political parties that never really stand a chance against the more moderate ones. But when there's only two parties (and an independent option that no one really seems to care about), they don't have anywhere else to go. In elections in which literally every vote counts, neither side wants to alienate these people. That makes them feel empowered and off it goes, pretty extreme and often ridiculous ideas start to get normalized and find more and more traction.
You could be right that Biden is not going to improve things and I don't know about Harris (simply don't know her well enough). It could very well still get worse. But I really doubt that a 4 year Biden presidency would come even close to doing the damage that four more years of Trump would do. And if after these 4 years there's a need to elect a republican again, I'm sure that that is what will happen. I do hope the choice will be made for a moderate one who at least tries to bring the two sides together.
Barring war or some similar cataclysmic event, it simply cannot be done.
-
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
A few points...Trump is not an ultra-conservative. Never has been. Especially not a fiscal conservative.
Bush 43? I remember the media being much tougher on him before 9/11, than on Obama. Trump just accelerated an already existing trend.
Nick Sandman? You really need to do some background reading. I think it will bring some clarity to the current state of the media.
Lastly, do you realize almost half the country voted for Trump? And I mean voted for. Probably about 75% of the votes he received were from people who liked his policies and political views. Those people still exist today.
Re-education and coercion by the MSM will continue. Ueber allen!
I checked out the Nick Sandmann case, and yes obviously that seems to be an instance of completely unacceptable and dishonest journalism.
Yes, I do realize almost half of those who voted, voted for Trump. This is something that I do find puzzling. There's a lot about this man to dislike, and it doesn't surprise me in the least that many people really hate him. And when you hate him, it is of course very difficult to have sympathy for those who voted for him.
On the other hand, whereas I would never vote for him, I do understand why other people voted for him over Clinton. I even get how he got through the primaries in 2016. He was something different, seemed refreshing and worth giving a try. Someone who would really shake things up (Drain the swamp!). And it seems like he did shake things up! But in a way that did not do your country much good in my opinion. And now it seems like all reason has left both sides and you're all blaming each other (although I believe - and hope - that my perception of the magnitude of it, is way overestimated due to how the media reports this).
And so, the left hates the right for voting for the guy they hate, and the right hates the left because of it. So the right continues to vote for Trump, and the left continues to hate the right for it. But four more years of this guy are not going to improve this in my opinion. He may be good for the economy and have certain policies that the right likes (hell, he may even have policies that the left likes), but that man is not made to keep a country together. The right seems to remain blind to that, and the left remains blind to their own flaws that nearly got Trump reelected. Both sides seem to be in dire need of introspection, but neither side seems to realize it.
Anyway, I can only look at this from far away through the eyes of our media and hope everything is not as heated in the US as they make it seem.
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
But four more years of this guy are not going to improve this in my opinion.
Definitely it won't. What it does is prevent America from wading further into the possibility of becoming the next Weimar republic. It'd look very different from Germany of course, but if enough of the militant left start getting elected, that's the kind of road they'd take us down. Who knows what that looks like but no thanks.
Trump's no threat whatsoever. Look at how many people hate his guts. Pretty hard to get away with much under that much scrutiny. On the left you have a shitload of truly scary behavior (Nick Sandmann. No I don't mean the DC incident, I mean the problems with his college after he won his court cases) that's being accepted and condoned.
-
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
But four more years of this guy are not going to improve this in my opinion.
Definitely it won't. What it does is prevent America from wading further into the possibility of becoming the next Weimar republic. It'd look very different from Germany of course, but if enough of the militant left start getting elected, that's the kind of road they'd take us down. Who knows what that looks like but no thanks.
Trump's no threat whatsoever. Look at how many people hate his guts. Pretty hard to get away with much under that much scrutiny. On the left you have a shitload of truly scary behavior (Nick Sandmann. No I don't mean the DC incident, I mean the problems with his college after he won his court cases) that's being accepted and condoned.
@Aqua-Letifer It’s been said in other threads here, but the results of the election do seem to point towards a rejection of Trump and not at all an acceptance of the (over)progressive left. In that sense, Trump may have done a great deal of damage. If a much less polarizing republican had been elected in 2016, maybe there would not have been a democrat elected now. Impossible to say for certain of course, but the fact that Trump didn’t manage to win the popular vote against Clinton (who was not very popular and one of the worst presidential candidates in the history of the US according to some...), does tell me that his victory wasn’t due to his overwhelming popularity...
Anyway, the fact that the anticipated blue wave seems to be limited to the presidential election, is hopeful, no? Based on these results, I predict a republican president is elected again 4 years from now if the issues you describe continue and perhaps get worse. It seems there is growing awareness around this, and a willingness to vote against it.
-
I would hardly call a .0116% margin a rejection.
-
@Aqua-Letifer It’s been said in other threads here, but the results of the election do seem to point towards a rejection of Trump and not at all an acceptance of the (over)progressive left. In that sense, Trump may have done a great deal of damage. If a much less polarizing republican had been elected in 2016, maybe there would not have been a democrat elected now. Impossible to say for certain of course, but the fact that Trump didn’t manage to win the popular vote against Clinton (who was not very popular and one of the worst presidential candidates in the history of the US according to some...), does tell me that his victory wasn’t due to his overwhelming popularity...
Anyway, the fact that the anticipated blue wave seems to be limited to the presidential election, is hopeful, no? Based on these results, I predict a republican president is elected again 4 years from now if the issues you describe continue and perhaps get worse. It seems there is growing awareness around this, and a willingness to vote against it.
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
a rejection of Trump
More people voted for Trump than for any other President in history. I'm more than willing to concede that he lost the popular vote, but 70,000,000 votes hardly qualifies as a "rejection."
And those 70 million were called "chumps" by the apparent winner.
Uniter, indeed.
-
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
a rejection of Trump
More people voted for Trump than for any other President in history. I'm more than willing to concede that he lost the popular vote, but 70,000,000 votes hardly qualifies as a "rejection."
And those 70 million were called "chumps" by the apparent winner.
Uniter, indeed.
@George-K said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
a rejection of Trump
More people voted for Trump than for any other President in history. I'm more than willing to concede that he lost the popular vote, but 70,000,000 votes hardly qualifies as a "rejection."
And those 70 million were called "chumps" by the apparent winner.
Uniter, indeed.
Indeed. +1
-
@George-K said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
a rejection of Trump
More people voted for Trump than for any other President in history. I'm more than willing to concede that he lost the popular vote, but 70,000,000 votes hardly qualifies as a "rejection."
And those 70 million were called "chumps" by the apparent winner.
Uniter, indeed.
Indeed. +1
-
As a people, we would make significant progress if we could find it in ourselves to acknowledge that both X-tremes, left and right, are problematical and burdensome. It isn't a matter of, oh the left is more awful or the right is more awful -- when what either of those positions boils down to is lack of understanding, lack of meeting of the minds, and disagreement with ME.
-
@brenda said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
Uniter, indeed.
Indeed. +1
Never forget which candidate, during the debates, called the other one "a clown" and told him to "shut up."
I guess that counts as occasionally impolite, right?
@George-K said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@brenda said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
Uniter, indeed.
Indeed. +1
Never forget which candidate, during the debates, called the other one "a clown" and told him to "shut up."
I guess that counts as occasionally impolite, right?
George, are you actually trying to claim that Donald Trump behaved with more class than Joe Biden during this election period?
-
@George-K said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@brenda said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
Uniter, indeed.
Indeed. +1
Never forget which candidate, during the debates, called the other one "a clown" and told him to "shut up."
I guess that counts as occasionally impolite, right?
George, are you actually trying to claim that Donald Trump behaved with more class than Joe Biden during this election period?
@Doctor-Phibes said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
George, are you actually trying to claim that Donald Trump behaved with more class than Joe Biden during this election period?
Of course not. I'm just disputing the civility that Biden claims, you chump.