Calling the States
-
Interesting... Trump has tightened up Wisconsin to 20K and 4K in Georgia.
That’s .017% for those keeping track...
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 03:26 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Calling the States:
Interesting... Trump has tightened up Wisconsin to 20K and 4K in Georgia.
That’s .017% for those keeping track...
The WI gap was 20658 when I did my calcs earlier.
Thought the GA gap ws less than that.
What time are you comparing to?
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 03:30 last edited by
I just re-checked the WI numbers on Fox and the only difference from my earlier post is they've reduced Biden's count by 118.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 03:31 last edited by
When I checked around 4, Biden was up 10K in Georgia and 25K in Wisconsin. I guesstimated the 30K-35K difference for Biden based on the outstanding Ballots, but it looks like Donald made up some ground.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 03:38 last edited by
My post was 355 eastern and the numbers are basically identical for WI. That small change in Biden only
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 03:38 last edited by
I didn’t note GA because I knew it was close enough for Jorgensen to make a difference. No need for math
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 03:39 last edited by
However I don’t remember it being any higher than 4K. Pretty sure it wasn’t.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 03:39 last edited by
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 03:40 last edited by
I see, it was around 1:30 https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/5026/027
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 03:43 last edited by
-
For those who support Biden, Trump is hated, hated, hated.
Any reference to him or his supporters must end with an insult.
It is beyond reason.
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:00 last edited by@Copper said in Calling the States:
For those who support Biden, Trump is hated, hated, hated.
Any reference to him or his supporters must end with an insult.
It is beyond reason.
Wanker
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:13 last edited by
-
@Larry Who is the "they" that coordinated this mass fraud?
I understand that you dont like the results, but NO ONE to this point has produced any solid evidence of wide fraud.
For example:
In Maricopa County in Arizona (largest county in Arizona)
Biden: 1004003
Trump: 950503Total Votes = 1954506
For Senate
Kelly: 1026014
McSally: 939987Total: 1966001
More votes cast for Senate than President. If there was fraud for the President, dont you think there would have been at least, if not more, votes for the President? And the %'s would be higher for Biden than for the Senate candidate?
I am sorry for you that your preferred candidate lost. But that is democracy in action.
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:41 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Calling the States:
@Larry Who is the "they" that coordinated this mass fraud?
I understand that you dont like the results, but NO ONE to this point has produced any solid evidence of wide fraud.
For example:
In Maricopa County in Arizona (largest county in Arizona)
Biden: 1004003
Trump: 950503Total Votes = 1954506
For Senate
Kelly: 1026014
McSally: 939987Total: 1966001
More votes cast for Senate than President. If there was fraud for the President, dont you think there would have been at least, if not more, votes for the President? And the %'s would be higher for Biden than for the Senate candidate?
I am sorry for you that your preferred candidate lost. But that is democracy in action.
No, there has been plenty of evidence of voter fraud.
And no, what we just witnessed is NOT democracy in action.
But that's ok. I'm going to sit back for the next couple of years and watch you leftwing nutjobs get exactly what you deserve.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Calling the States:
@Larry Who is the "they" that coordinated this mass fraud?
I understand that you dont like the results, but NO ONE to this point has produced any solid evidence of wide fraud.
For example:
In Maricopa County in Arizona (largest county in Arizona)
Biden: 1004003
Trump: 950503Total Votes = 1954506
For Senate
Kelly: 1026014
McSally: 939987Total: 1966001
More votes cast for Senate than President. If there was fraud for the President, dont you think there would have been at least, if not more, votes for the President? And the %'s would be higher for Biden than for the Senate candidate?
I am sorry for you that your preferred candidate lost. But that is democracy in action.
No, there has been plenty of evidence of voter fraud.
And no, what we just witnessed is NOT democracy in action.
But that's ok. I'm going to sit back for the next couple of years and watch you leftwing nutjobs get exactly what you deserve.
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:43 last edited by@Larry said in Calling the States:
No, there has been plenty of evidence of voter fraud.
Odd that all the president's lawyers can't present any to the state courts.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:43 last edited by
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:43 last edited by
-
@Larry said in Calling the States:
No, there has been plenty of evidence of voter fraud.
Odd that all the president's lawyers can't present any to the state courts.
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:45 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Calling the States:
@Larry said in Calling the States:
No, there has been plenty of evidence of voter fraud.
Odd that all the president's lawyers can't present any to the state courts.
I've lived in Georgia. 15 years. I can tell you with 100% certainty that Joe Biden did not win the state of Georgia. It is just flat out impossible.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:46 last edited by
The argument from personal incredulity is always convincing.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:47 last edited by
He may well not have won it. It's very close and there are still military/foreign service votes to count. Plus an automatic recount.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:48 last edited by
Just as convincing as telling me that a senile fool sat in his basement the entire campaign season and hid won the election honest.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 04:49 last edited by jon-nyc 11 Jul 2020, 04:55
@Larry said in Calling the States:
Just as convincing as telling me that a senile fool sat in his basement the entire campaign season and hid won the election honest.
The argument from personal incredulity is always convincing.