Hey, Trump bashers
-
@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@George-K said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:
Well if rolling stone says so, that ends the discussion.
Typical retort. Dont like the message, shoot the messenger. You really do have much in common with trump. Fucking ostrich
Nothing like making your point with name-calling.
But, seriously, try to find something more current (it's not that hard) on wealth of Red vs Blue states and see how they lean politically.
Look at the big donors that contribute to political campaigns and see where the money goes. That's not hard either.
Slogans are easy, facts are a bit more difficult.
You can start here: https://capitalresearch.org/article/party-one-percent/
Top 300 zip codes nationwide (representing the top 1.4 percent of socio-economic status):
Democrats $71 million
Republicans $47 million
(60 percent Democratic)Big Four metropolitan areas’ zip codes in top 5 percent by socio-economic status:
Democrats $77 million
Republicans $42 million
(65 percent Democratic)Big Four central-city zip codes in top 5 percent of socio-economic status:
Democrats $48 million
Republicans $21 million
(70 percent Democratic)These data are powerful evidence that affluent Americans in the most elite locales contribute significantly more money to Democrats than Republicans. The data also show that Democrats raise a notable chunk of their campaign money in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. Democratic candidates and party officials attending affluent contributors’ fundraisers evidently have to spend a lot of time in airliners or private jets flying coast to coast across the country, while Republican candidates and party officials have to make significantly more fundraising stops, staggered across the giant landmass of America between the two coasts.
Half a century ago, many liberal commentators argued that Democrats, as the party whose policies allegedly represented the interests of lower-income Americans, had an unfair disadvantage in raising money for campaigns, because they couldn’t compete with Republicans for access to the checkbooks of the wealthy. The data presented here make clear that that argument, regardless of whether it was valid then, has no validity today.
The hypocrisy here is mindnumbing. The resident redneck calls people names here on a daily basis here. Far worse names than ostrich. But his politics align with yours, thus the pass.
You are doing some terrific work here tonight.
I am just about ready to follow you and switch sides.
You are such a persuasive person.
Just give me a little more wisdom.
@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@George-K said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:
Well if rolling stone says so, that ends the discussion.
Typical retort. Dont like the message, shoot the messenger. You really do have much in common with trump. Fucking ostrich
Nothing like making your point with name-calling.
But, seriously, try to find something more current (it's not that hard) on wealth of Red vs Blue states and see how they lean politically.
Look at the big donors that contribute to political campaigns and see where the money goes. That's not hard either.
Slogans are easy, facts are a bit more difficult.
You can start here: https://capitalresearch.org/article/party-one-percent/
Top 300 zip codes nationwide (representing the top 1.4 percent of socio-economic status):
Democrats $71 million
Republicans $47 million
(60 percent Democratic)Big Four metropolitan areas’ zip codes in top 5 percent by socio-economic status:
Democrats $77 million
Republicans $42 million
(65 percent Democratic)Big Four central-city zip codes in top 5 percent of socio-economic status:
Democrats $48 million
Republicans $21 million
(70 percent Democratic)These data are powerful evidence that affluent Americans in the most elite locales contribute significantly more money to Democrats than Republicans. The data also show that Democrats raise a notable chunk of their campaign money in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. Democratic candidates and party officials attending affluent contributors’ fundraisers evidently have to spend a lot of time in airliners or private jets flying coast to coast across the country, while Republican candidates and party officials have to make significantly more fundraising stops, staggered across the giant landmass of America between the two coasts.
Half a century ago, many liberal commentators argued that Democrats, as the party whose policies allegedly represented the interests of lower-income Americans, had an unfair disadvantage in raising money for campaigns, because they couldn’t compete with Republicans for access to the checkbooks of the wealthy. The data presented here make clear that that argument, regardless of whether it was valid then, has no validity today.
The hypocrisy here is mindnumbing. The resident redneck calls people names here on a daily basis here. Far worse names than ostrich. But his politics align with yours, thus the pass.
You are doing some terrific work here tonight.
I am just about ready to follow you and switch sides.
You are such a persuasive person.
Just give me a little more wisdom.
Part of it is that he still hasn't gotten over it that I told him anyone who would play a keyboard that hangs around your neck is a pussy.
-
@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@George-K said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:
@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:
Well if rolling stone says so, that ends the discussion.
Typical retort. Dont like the message, shoot the messenger. You really do have much in common with trump. Fucking ostrich
Nothing like making your point with name-calling.
But, seriously, try to find something more current (it's not that hard) on wealth of Red vs Blue states and see how they lean politically.
Look at the big donors that contribute to political campaigns and see where the money goes. That's not hard either.
Slogans are easy, facts are a bit more difficult.
You can start here: https://capitalresearch.org/article/party-one-percent/
Top 300 zip codes nationwide (representing the top 1.4 percent of socio-economic status):
Democrats $71 million
Republicans $47 million
(60 percent Democratic)Big Four metropolitan areas’ zip codes in top 5 percent by socio-economic status:
Democrats $77 million
Republicans $42 million
(65 percent Democratic)Big Four central-city zip codes in top 5 percent of socio-economic status:
Democrats $48 million
Republicans $21 million
(70 percent Democratic)These data are powerful evidence that affluent Americans in the most elite locales contribute significantly more money to Democrats than Republicans. The data also show that Democrats raise a notable chunk of their campaign money in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. Democratic candidates and party officials attending affluent contributors’ fundraisers evidently have to spend a lot of time in airliners or private jets flying coast to coast across the country, while Republican candidates and party officials have to make significantly more fundraising stops, staggered across the giant landmass of America between the two coasts.
Half a century ago, many liberal commentators argued that Democrats, as the party whose policies allegedly represented the interests of lower-income Americans, had an unfair disadvantage in raising money for campaigns, because they couldn’t compete with Republicans for access to the checkbooks of the wealthy. The data presented here make clear that that argument, regardless of whether it was valid then, has no validity today.
The hypocrisy here is mindnumbing. The resident redneck calls people names here on a daily basis here. Far worse names than ostrich. But his politics align with yours, thus the pass.
You are doing some terrific work here tonight.
I am just about ready to follow you and switch sides.
You are such a persuasive person.
Just give me a little more wisdom.
Part of it is that he still hasn't gotten over it that I told him anyone who would play a keyboard that hangs around your neck is a pussy.
@Larry said in Hey, Trump bashers:
Part of it is that he still hasn't gotten over it that I told him anyone who would play a keyboard that hangs around your neck is a pussy.
Hey, no dissing Herbie Hancock.
-
So let's see.... Horace is an intellectual snob, I am a selfish redneck, all republicans are amoral, and Sock is superior to us..
Got it.
Oh hark - do I hear the plaintiff cry of panic and desperation from a fruitcake lefty as it sinks in his thick, tiny brain that his party is about to be toast? Why yes, I believe I do!
Sock, I'll have you know that Horace is not a snob at all. I agree with you that he's intellectually superior to you, but he's far from being a snob. But if he WAS a snob about being smarter than you he'd at least have reason to feel that way - what's your excuse? Would you be considered an ignorant snob?
Redneck... hmmm.... I've noticed that California fruits like you tend to throw the word redneck at anyone from the South. You might want to know that not only does this show you to be ignorant, it shows you to be a bigot as well. I've seen a few redneck over the years, and I'm sorry but I don't qualify. Selfish... hmmm.... I give away more in a year than you make.
So fuck you.
@Larry said in Hey, Trump bashers:
So let's see.... Horace is an intellectual snob, I am a selfish redneck, all republicans are amoral, and Sock is superior to us..
Got it.
Oh hark - do I hear the plaintive cry of panic and desperation from a fruitcake lefty as it sinks in his thick, tiny brain that his party is about to be toast? Why yes, I believe I do!
Sock, I'll have you know that Horace is not a snob at all. I agree with you that he's intellectually superior to you, but he's far from being a snob. But if he WAS a snob about being smarter than you he'd at least have reason to feel that way - what's your excuse? Would you be considered an ignorant snob?
Redneck... hmmm.... I've noticed that California fruits like you tend to throw the word redneck at anyone from the South. You might want to know that not only does this show you to be ignorant, it shows you to be a bigot as well. I've seen a few redneck over the years, and I'm sorry but I don't qualify. Selfish... hmmm.... I give away more in a year than you make.
So fuck you.
well yeah fixed it for you but you're good, Larry. Thanks for that.
image url)