Thievery, most foul?

[Axtremus]

The pro-Trump camp tried the WSJ and the WSJ passed.
They probably wish there is still an Assagne led WikiLeaks to distribute these “raw data” now, that would still give them more credibility than they making the data available themselves.

[Doctor Phibes]

Sounds like a right load of old bullshit to me.

[Jolly]

Oh, I think the story has legs now. I don't know if Biden did anything illegal or not.

Maybe that will be left up to the Special Prosecutor.

[Doctor Phibes]

The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

[Jolly]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

Hopefully he has photocopies.

Wouldn't that be fun?

[Doctor Phibes]

@Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

Hopefully he has photocopies.

Wouldn't that be fun?

If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

The idea that this all comes to pass days before the election stretches the bounds of credibility.

[Jolly]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

Hopefully he has photocopies.

Wouldn't that be fun?

If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

Wouldn't say that. What can be proved with certainty, is that the contents of the package were stolen somewhere within the transporting organization.

[Doctor Phibes]

@Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

Hopefully he has photocopies.

Wouldn't that be fun?

If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

Wouldn't say that. What can be proved with certainty, is that the contents of the package were stolen somewhere within the transporting organization.

Right, nobody made a copy, then they mailed the originals to Tucker, they told somebody what was in it, and he stole them.

Yeah, that sounds totally believable.

[Jolly]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

Hopefully he has photocopies.

Wouldn't that be fun?

If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

Wouldn't say that. What can be proved with certainty, is that the contents of the package were stolen somewhere within the transporting organization.

Right, nobody made a copy, then they mailed the originals to Tucker, they told somebody what was in it, and he stole them.

Yeah, that sounds totally believable.

Why would Tucker lie? It's not anything He hasn't already said, just more proof of the same.

[Doctor Phibes]

@Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

Why would Tucker lie? It's not anything He hasn't already said, just more proof of the same.

Unless he has actual documents, it's not proof of anything. That's the point. Saying you have proof of something, but that your contact mailed the originals, didn't make a copy, and then they were stolen in transit, is basically saying 'I think you'll believe anything'.

If it's true, he'll be able to the produce copies of the documents. If he can't produce the documents, it's not true. It's that simple.

[George K]

I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.

[Doctor Phibes]

[Loki]

@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:

I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.

Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.

[Doctor Phibes]

@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:

@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:

I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.

Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.

It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.

[jon-nyc]

His dog ate his evidence.

[Doctor Phibes]

@Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

Why would Tucker lie?

Why do the rest of the MSM lie?

If this article was by CNN, and about documents incriminating Trump, would you believe them?

[Loki]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

Why would Tucker lie?

Why do the rest of the MSM lie?

If this article was by CNN, and about documents incriminating Trump, would you believe them?

It’s so obvious that everyone asked where are the copies and just show them. The fact that Tucker doesn’t say anything about that undercuts everything. We are all stuck with awaiting 5he answer to that question. There is nowhere to go.

Buehler....

[George K]

@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:

t’s so obvious that everyone asked where are the copies and just show them.

One blogger has posted that a "very reliable source" told him that there is another copy.

We'll see.

[Loki]

@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:

@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:

t’s so obvious that everyone asked where are the copies and just show them.

One blogger has posted that a "very reliable source" told him that there is another copy.

We'll see.

How is it possible there is not another copy? This is like a shaggy dog story. No way no how there wouldn’t be another copy. This story is a joke as presented.

[Copper]

I watched this last night.

I don't think he ever implied there was no copy.

Is he saying there is no copy?

The story is that the package was stolen. And the theft may have been done to disrupt a story, not to kill the story.

I can't imagine there is no copy. Did someone imagine that?