Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Thievery, most foul?

Thievery, most foul?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
99 Posts 15 Posters 1.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Link to video

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Seems like to me a ratings story.

      No one deals really just in the hardcopies anymore. You have electronic version or If this is really that big, you make copies. I wouldn’t think that you would mail off the only “explosive evidence“ you have with no back up. If it were such a big deal and you had no backup, you put a guy on a plane to hand carry.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

        Seems like to me a ratings story.

        No one deals really just in the hardcopies anymore. You have electronic version or If this is really that big, you make copies. I wouldn’t think that you would mail off the only “explosive evidence“ you have with no back up. If it were such a big deal and you had no backup, you put a guy on a plane to hand carry.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Loki
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @taiwan_girl said in Thievery, most foul?:

        Seems like to me a ratings story.

        No one deals really just in the hardcopies anymore. You have electronic version or If this is really that big, you make copies. I wouldn’t think that you would mail off the only “explosive evidence“ you have with no back up. If it were such a big deal and you had no backup, you put a guy on a plane to hand carry.

        I think everyone is asking your question as well as what we’re the documents of? Tucker has to reveal something now or he just looks silly.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          The pro-Trump camp tried the WSJ and the WSJ passed.
          They probably wish there is still an Assagne led WikiLeaks to distribute these “raw data” now, that would still give them more credibility than they making the data available themselves.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • Doctor PhibesD Offline
            Doctor PhibesD Offline
            Doctor Phibes
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Sounds like a right load of old bullshit to me.

            I was only joking

            1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Oh, I think the story has legs now. I don't know if Biden did anything illegal or not.

              Maybe that will be left up to the Special Prosecutor.😊

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                Doctor Phibes
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                I was only joking

                JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                  The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                  The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                  Hopefully he has photocopies.

                  Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  Doctor PhibesD LarryL 2 Replies Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                    The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                    Hopefully he has photocopies.

                    Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                    Doctor Phibes
                    wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                    #9

                    @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                    @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                    The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                    Hopefully he has photocopies.

                    Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                    If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

                    The idea that this all comes to pass days before the election stretches the bounds of credibility.

                    I was only joking

                    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                      @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                      @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                      The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                      Hopefully he has photocopies.

                      Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                      If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

                      The idea that this all comes to pass days before the election stretches the bounds of credibility.

                      JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                      @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                      @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                      The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                      Hopefully he has photocopies.

                      Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                      If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

                      Wouldn't say that. What can be proved with certainty, is that the contents of the package were stolen somewhere within the transporting organization.

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Jolly

                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                        @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                        The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                        Hopefully he has photocopies.

                        Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                        If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

                        Wouldn't say that. What can be proved with certainty, is that the contents of the package were stolen somewhere within the transporting organization.

                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                        @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                        The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                        Hopefully he has photocopies.

                        Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                        If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

                        Wouldn't say that. What can be proved with certainty, is that the contents of the package were stolen somewhere within the transporting organization.

                        Right, nobody made a copy, then they mailed the originals to Tucker, they told somebody what was in it, and he stole them.

                        Yeah, that sounds totally believable.

                        I was only joking

                        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                          @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                          @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                          The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                          Hopefully he has photocopies.

                          Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                          If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

                          Wouldn't say that. What can be proved with certainty, is that the contents of the package were stolen somewhere within the transporting organization.

                          Right, nobody made a copy, then they mailed the originals to Tucker, they told somebody what was in it, and he stole them.

                          Yeah, that sounds totally believable.

                          JollyJ Offline
                          JollyJ Offline
                          Jolly
                          wrote on last edited by Jolly
                          #12

                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                          @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                          @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                          The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                          Hopefully he has photocopies.

                          Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                          If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

                          Wouldn't say that. What can be proved with certainty, is that the contents of the package were stolen somewhere within the transporting organization.

                          Right, nobody made a copy, then they mailed the originals to Tucker, they told somebody what was in it, and he stole them.

                          Yeah, that sounds totally believable.

                          Why would Tucker lie? It's not anything He hasn't already said, just more proof of the same.

                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                          Doctor PhibesD 2 Replies Last reply
                          • JollyJ Jolly

                            @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                            @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                            @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                            @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                            @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                            The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                            Hopefully he has photocopies.

                            Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                            If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

                            Wouldn't say that. What can be proved with certainty, is that the contents of the package were stolen somewhere within the transporting organization.

                            Right, nobody made a copy, then they mailed the originals to Tucker, they told somebody what was in it, and he stole them.

                            Yeah, that sounds totally believable.

                            Why would Tucker lie? It's not anything He hasn't already said, just more proof of the same.

                            Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor Phibes
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                            Why would Tucker lie? It's not anything He hasn't already said, just more proof of the same.

                            Unless he has actual documents, it's not proof of anything. That's the point. Saying you have proof of something, but that your contact mailed the originals, didn't make a copy, and then they were stolen in transit, is basically saying 'I think you'll believe anything'.

                            If it's true, he'll be able to the produce copies of the documents. If he can't produce the documents, it's not true. It's that simple.

                            I was only joking

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • George KG Offline
                              George KG Offline
                              George K
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.

                              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor Phibes
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                alt text

                                I was only joking

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • George KG George K

                                  I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Loki
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                  I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.

                                  Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.

                                  Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • L Loki

                                    @George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                    I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.

                                    Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.

                                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor Phibes
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                    @George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                    I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.

                                    Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.

                                    It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.

                                    I was only joking

                                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nyc
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      His dog ate his evidence.

                                      Only non-witches get due process.

                                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • JollyJ Jolly

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                        @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                        @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                        The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.

                                        Hopefully he has photocopies.

                                        Wouldn't that be fun?😄

                                        If he doesn't, then he's basically shown to be lying.

                                        Wouldn't say that. What can be proved with certainty, is that the contents of the package were stolen somewhere within the transporting organization.

                                        Right, nobody made a copy, then they mailed the originals to Tucker, they told somebody what was in it, and he stole them.

                                        Yeah, that sounds totally believable.

                                        Why would Tucker lie? It's not anything He hasn't already said, just more proof of the same.

                                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor Phibes
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                        Why would Tucker lie?

                                        Why do the rest of the MSM lie?

                                        If this article was by CNN, and about documents incriminating Trump, would you believe them?

                                        I was only joking

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                          @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                          Why would Tucker lie?

                                          Why do the rest of the MSM lie?

                                          If this article was by CNN, and about documents incriminating Trump, would you believe them?

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Loki
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                          @Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:

                                          Why would Tucker lie?

                                          Why do the rest of the MSM lie?

                                          If this article was by CNN, and about documents incriminating Trump, would you believe them?

                                          It’s so obvious that everyone asked where are the copies and just show them. The fact that Tucker doesn’t say anything about that undercuts everything. We are all stuck with awaiting 5he answer to that question. There is nowhere to go.

                                          Buehler....

                                          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups