Mitch talks about ACB's nomination and precedent

[Jolly]

I've mentioned Jefferson.

That's Northern California, for those of you who don't follow such things. Seems to me, that makes more sense than Puerto Rico.

As for D.C., there is a reason the city is made the way it is. Leave it alone.

[Rainman]

@Axtremus said in Mitch talks about ACB's nomination and precedent:

Whether their getting statehood gives this party or that party some temporary advantage is beside the point.

Nice try. But, that's exactly THE point when it is the purpose for pursuing in the first place.
"...some temporary advantage..." Ax, you a funny dude, you make me 5555555.

[Doctor Phibes]

The really funny thing about the selection process is you've got a bunch of rank amateurs taking part in a bizarre circus to decide whether somebody is qualified to take a job which should be one of the most seriously considered positions in the country.

The Kavanaugh selection was truly embarrassing to watch.

Just out of interest, can anybody name a single member of a supreme court other than those of the US? No Googling.

[Jolly]

Does anybody else matter?

[Doctor Phibes]

When your country falls apart, they'll be the ones deciding on which peace-keeping force to send in to pacify the natives.

I hope you like shiny trinkets.

[Larry]

We're not falling for that again....

[Jolly]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Mitch talks about ACB's nomination and precedent:

When your country falls apart, they'll be the ones deciding on which peace-keeping force to send in to pacify the natives.

I hope you like shiny trinkets.

We do. I think we still have British trinkets in New Orleans and several Mexican trinkets in San Jacinto...

[Larry]

Now we sell trinkets to Yankees. One they seem to like is a little wooden jack ass that you fill with toothpicks. When you push down on its head the tail raises and a toothpick shoots out its sss....