Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter
-
wrote on 10 Oct 2020, 23:14 last edited by
I'm so FUCKING glad it's gone.
We all danced around the word for more than a decade, substituting a "v" for a "u".
Now, there's no need.
-
wrote on 10 Oct 2020, 23:15 last edited by
Fuck you.....
-
wrote on 10 Oct 2020, 23:17 last edited by
It’s a win for proper spelling.
It’s a win for the English language. -
wrote on 10 Oct 2020, 23:17 last edited by
Get your fucking piano tuned.
-
wrote on 10 Oct 2020, 23:24 last edited by
Fuckity, fuck, fuck, fuck!
-
wrote on 10 Oct 2020, 23:32 last edited by
I actually like posting the occasional fvck.
-
I actually like posting the occasional fvck.
wrote on 11 Oct 2020, 01:03 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
I actually like posting the occasional fvck.
In that case you only need to fight your computer/phone/tablet’s build-in spellchecking function. If you spell it that way often enough, the machine learning algorithm on your computer/phone/tablet might “learn” it and stop auto-correcting it.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
I actually like posting the occasional fvck.
In that case you only need to fight your computer/phone/tablet’s build-in spellchecking function. If you spell it that way often enough, the machine learning algorithm on your computer/phone/tablet might “learn” it and stop auto-correcting it.
wrote on 11 Oct 2020, 01:13 last edited by@Axtremus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
@LuFins-Dad said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
I actually like posting the occasional fvck.
In that case you only need to fight your computer/phone/tablet’s build-in spellchecking function. If you spell it that way often enough, the machine learning algorithm on your computer/phone/tablet might “learn” it and stop auto-correcting it.
Horsehockeyq.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
I actually like posting the occasional fvck.
In that case you only need to fight your computer/phone/tablet’s build-in spellchecking function. If you spell it that way often enough, the machine learning algorithm on your computer/phone/tablet might “learn” it and stop auto-correcting it.
wrote on 11 Oct 2020, 01:14 last edited by@Axtremus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
@LuFins-Dad said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
I actually like posting the occasional fvck.
In that case you only need to fight your computer/phone/tablet’s build-in spellchecking function. If you spell it that way often enough, the machine learning algorithm on your computer/phone/tablet might “learn” it and stop auto-correcting it.
Or you could be a man and just turn autocorrect and autofill the hell off.
-
Which reminds me ... @brenda has your phone/computer/tablet learnt not to correct the extra o’s you like to put in “Minnesota”?
wrote on 11 Oct 2020, 04:50 last edited by@Axtremus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
Which reminds me ... @brenda has your phone/computer/tablet learnt not to correct the extra o’s you like to put in “Minnesota”?
My Minnesooooooota phone and laptop absolutely know the proper usage of o's in Minnesoooooota. It's automagically correct every time.
-
@Axtremus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
Which reminds me ... @brenda has your phone/computer/tablet learnt not to correct the extra o’s you like to put in “Minnesota”?
My Minnesooooooota phone and laptop absolutely know the proper usage of o's in Minnesoooooota. It's automagically correct every time.
wrote on 11 Oct 2020, 04:58 last edited by@brenda said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
@Axtremus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
Which reminds me ... @brenda has your phone/computer/tablet learnt not to correct the extra o’s you like to put in “Minnesota”?
My Minnesooooooota phone and laptop absolutely know the proper usage of o's in Minnesoooooota. It's automagically correct every time.
I can’t help but notice that the number of “o”s isn’t even consistent in that single sentence
-
@brenda said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
@Axtremus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
Which reminds me ... @brenda has your phone/computer/tablet learnt not to correct the extra o’s you like to put in “Minnesota”?
My Minnesooooooota phone and laptop absolutely know the proper usage of o's in Minnesoooooota. It's automagically correct every time.
I can’t help but notice that the number of “o”s isn’t even consistent in that single sentence
wrote on 11 Oct 2020, 05:01 last edited by@Klaus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
@brenda said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
@Axtremus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
Which reminds me ... @brenda has your phone/computer/tablet learnt not to correct the extra o’s you like to put in “Minnesota”?
My Minnesooooooota phone and laptop absolutely know the proper usage of o's in Minnesoooooota. It's automagically correct every time.
I can’t help but notice that the number of “o”s isn’t even consistent in that single sentence
Exactly. My phone and laptop automagically know exactly how many o's to use depending on the occasion, length of sentence, and topic. It's very advanced technology that's only available in Minnesoooooota.
-
wrote on 11 Oct 2020, 05:16 last edited by
Oh, sorry, I underestimated the complexity of the issue. So you are saying that the number of o’s depends on the context and you phone can still get it right? That sounds like a breakthrough in machine learning on a massive scale.
-
Oh, sorry, I underestimated the complexity of the issue. So you are saying that the number of o’s depends on the context and you phone can still get it right? That sounds like a breakthrough in machine learning on a massive scale.
wrote on 11 Oct 2020, 20:24 last edited by@Klaus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
Oh, sorry, I underestimated the complexity of the issue. So you are saying that the number of o’s depends on the context and you phone can still get it right? That sounds like a breakthrough in machine learning on a massive scale.
That's why it's only available in Minnesooooooooooooooooota.
Gee, even I'm impressed with the accuracy this provides, and it never runs out of o's. It also allows me to gift others with o's, which you have seen on previous occasions.
We're just darn lucky here in Minnesoooooooota.
-
@Klaus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
@brenda said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
@Axtremus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
Which reminds me ... @brenda has your phone/computer/tablet learnt not to correct the extra o’s you like to put in “Minnesota”?
My Minnesooooooota phone and laptop absolutely know the proper usage of o's in Minnesoooooota. It's automagically correct every time.
I can’t help but notice that the number of “o”s isn’t even consistent in that single sentence
Exactly. My phone and laptop automagically know exactly how many o's to use depending on the occasion, length of sentence, and topic. It's very advanced technology that's only available in Minnesoooooota.
wrote on 11 Oct 2020, 20:34 last edited by@brenda said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
My phone and laptop automagically know exactly how many o's to use depending on the occasion, length of sentence, and topic. It's very advanced technology that's only available in Minnesoooooota.
Nice save.
-
Oh, sorry, I underestimated the complexity of the issue. So you are saying that the number of o’s depends on the context and you phone can still get it right? That sounds like a breakthrough in machine learning on a massive scale.
wrote on 11 Oct 2020, 20:52 last edited by Mik 10 Nov 2020, 20:52@Klaus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
Oh, sorry, I underestimated the complexity of the issue. So you are saying that the number of o’s depends on the context and you phone can still get it right? That sounds like a breakthrough in machine learning on a massive scale.
No, it's just scared of Brenda.
-
@Klaus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
Oh, sorry, I underestimated the complexity of the issue. So you are saying that the number of o’s depends on the context and you phone can still get it right? That sounds like a breakthrough in machine learning on a massive scale.
No, it's just scared of Brenda.
wrote on 12 Oct 2020, 04:21 last edited by@Mik said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
@Klaus said in Forum Issues: The Obscenity Filter:
Oh, sorry, I underestimated the complexity of the issue. So you are saying that the number of o’s depends on the context and you phone can still get it right? That sounds like a breakthrough in machine learning on a massive scale.
No, it's just scared of Brenda.
