The VEEP debate
-
Questioner: Do you believe in climate change?
VP Pence: Umm, we will continue to listen to science (When did that start?????)
PS: They do need a microphone muting function for the questioner (to mute the two candidates).
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 01:44 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in The VEEP debate:
Questioner: Do you believe in climate change?
VP Pence: Umm, we will continue to listen to science (When did that start?????)
PS: They do need a microphone muting function for the questioner (to mute the two candidates).
And Biden won’t stop fracking. Not a great retort. And we are reducing co2 more than countries following the accord and no retort to that.
-
Somehow Pence comes off more dickish talking over Susan Page than Trump did talking over Wallace.
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 01:44 last edited by@jon-nyc said in The VEEP debate:
Somehow Pence comes off more dickish talking over Susan Page than Trump did talking over Wallace.
Not my take and I am not a fan of Pence.
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 01:45 last edited by
Partly because she’s a woman (Page) and partly because people don’t have such low expectations of Pence.
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 01:46 last edited by
I dont think I will be able to listen to the whole thing as a meeting to attend.
First half impression: This will not change anybody mind. Neither are doing terrible, but neither are doing great.
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 01:47 last edited by
Harris is now worried about the economy. And blames on Trump. Gee does anyone not see the elephant in the room. Who demanded we shut down the economy?
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 01:53 last edited by
Anyone know who helped them prepare? Who played Kamala for Pence and vice versa?
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 01:55 last edited by
Betrayed our friends and embraced despots. Good call out Kamala
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 01:59 last edited by
Kamala is relying on canned talking points and it shows.
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 01:59 last edited by
@George-K said in The VEEP debate:
Pence keeps going over his time. Annoying.
When she goes over, she just says that she is going to keep going and the moderator shuts up.
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 01:59 last edited by
I don’t think him talking over the moderator makes him look as good as he thinks it does.
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 02:03 last edited by
Biggest lie tonight was told by the moderator: “You have 2 minutes to speak, uninterrupted.”
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 02:04 last edited by
Comparing the interruptions to the prior years I don’t see this as being out of line.
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 02:10 last edited by
Pence is now operating one question behind.
-
He’s using the American people as human shields for his administration’s incompetence.
I doubt anyone buys it.
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 02:11 last edited by@jon-nyc said in The VEEP debate:
He’s using the American people as human shields for his administration’s incompetence.
I doubt anyone buys it.
Bull shit.
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 02:14 last edited by
Why are you guys acting like any of this crap matters?
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 02:14 last edited by
You do it with football.
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 02:15 last edited by
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 02:18 last edited by
The fly on Pence’s head will be the most viral moment. My prediction. Lol
-
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 02:18 last edited by
He’s a trooper, that fly. That’s staying power.
-
Questioner: Do you believe in climate change?
VP Pence: Umm, we will continue to listen to science (When did that start?????)
PS: They do need a microphone muting function for the questioner (to mute the two candidates).
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 02:19 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in The VEEP debate:
Questioner: Do you believe in climate change?
VP Pence: Umm, we will continue to listen to science (When did that start?????)
One of the biggest lies the Media/democrats have told and that so many Left leaning people have fallen for is that Trump (And republicans in general) do not follow the science. The truth is just the opposite. Republicans including Trump HAVE been following the science. It is the Left/democrats who instead of actually following science, have cherry picked the parts of it that fits their agenda, added unscientific claims to it, and then accused anyone who challenged their false narrative of "not following the science".
So the truth is just the opposite of what you've insinuated.