California stifles political speech?
-
wrote on 7 Oct 2020, 16:19 last edited by
-
wrote on 7 Oct 2020, 16:33 last edited by
Only has to hold up until after the election...Kinda like shutting the country down.
The virus will suddenly be less important on 11/4/20.
-
wrote on 7 Oct 2020, 16:48 last edited by
@xenon said in California stifles political speech?:
@George-K That's not gonna hold up in court
Of course it's not. But, as Jolly notes, that's not the point.
-
wrote on 7 Oct 2020, 16:50 last edited by
Doesn't matter if it holds up. The damage has already been done.
The question here is zoning, and if this person is permitted to have a sign of that size on that particular property.
-
wrote on 7 Oct 2020, 16:57 last edited by
And it’s ridiculously unnecessary. Trump isn’t going to win California, so taking it down only makes you look small and ridiculously sensitive.
-
Doesn't matter if it holds up. The damage has already been done.
The question here is zoning, and if this person is permitted to have a sign of that size on that particular property.
wrote on 7 Oct 2020, 16:59 last edited by George K 10 Jul 2020, 16:59@Mik said in California stifles political speech?:
The question here is zoning, and if this person is permitted to have a sign of that size on that particular property.
Good point, although that was not the reason given.
-
wrote on 7 Oct 2020, 17:03 last edited by
California went for Nixon, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Reagan and Bush
6 in a row
Of course, 4 of the 6 were hometown boys
-
And it’s ridiculously unnecessary. Trump isn’t going to win California, so taking it down only makes you look small and ridiculously sensitive.
wrote on 8 Oct 2020, 00:58 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in California stifles political speech?:
And it’s ridiculously unnecessary. Trump isn’t going to win California, so taking it down only makes you look small and ridiculously sensitive.
Agree. It is a goofy thing for them to try and take it down.