California stifles political speech?

[George K]

Link to video

[xenon]

[Jolly]

Only has to hold up until after the election...Kinda like shutting the country down.

The virus will suddenly be less important on 11/4/20.

[George K]

@xenon said in California stifles political speech?:

@George-K That's not gonna hold up in court

Of course it's not. But, as Jolly notes, that's not the point.

[Mik]

Doesn't matter if it holds up. The damage has already been done.

The question here is zoning, and if this person is permitted to have a sign of that size on that particular property.

[LuFins Dad]

And it’s ridiculously unnecessary. Trump isn’t going to win California, so taking it down only makes you look small and ridiculously sensitive.

[George K]

@Mik said in California stifles political speech?:

The question here is zoning, and if this person is permitted to have a sign of that size on that particular property.

Good point, although that was not the reason given.

[Copper]

California went for Nixon, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Reagan and Bush

6 in a row

Of course, 4 of the 6 were hometown boys

[taiwan_girl]

@LuFins-Dad said in California stifles political speech?:

And it’s ridiculously unnecessary. Trump isn’t going to win California, so taking it down only makes you look small and ridiculously sensitive.

Agree. It is a goofy thing for them to try and take it down.