Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Bolton: "I'm guilty of retaining classified documents."

Bolton: "I'm guilty of retaining classified documents."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
17 Posts 6 Posters 75 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    I was wrong. Bluesky actually hates Bolton, which does make sense. So their take is mostly the whataboutism about Trump doing the same thing.

    Education is extremely important.

    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Away
      MikM Away
      Mik
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      All positions there are based on hatred of Trump. Ideological relativism.

      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

      1 Reply Last reply
      • HoraceH Horace

        I was wrong. Bluesky actually hates Bolton, which does make sense. So their take is mostly the whataboutism about Trump doing the same thing.

        RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote last edited by Renauda
        #9

        @Horace

        Thank you for reporting back.

        Bluesky actually hates Bolton, which does make sense.

        Perhaps, although his Cold Warrior understanding of global security no longer appears to be the dinosaur it was prior to 2014. That and he thoroughly understands Trump’s ineptitude in matters pertaining to foreign policy, security and defence

        So their take is mostly the whataboutism about Trump doing the same thing.

        That ought not to surprise you in the least. Whataboutism is a characteristic shared by the left and right woke alike. Why, just look at this forum the past number years.

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote last edited by Horace
          #10

          Nothing logically wrong with a whataboutism argument, as long as it is used to combat a point about one side being preferrable to another because of anecdote x. If the other supposedly inferior side has a counterexample anecdote y of the same or greater importance as x, then the original argument has successfully been defused by the whataboutism. It's true that whataboutisms are basically weak, but they are perfect to combat essentially weak anecdotal arguments about one tribe being superior to the other.

          Education is extremely important.

          Doctor PhibesD RenaudaR Andrea BA 3 Replies Last reply
          • HoraceH Horace

            Nothing logically wrong with a whataboutism argument, as long as it is used to combat a point about one side being preferrable to another because of anecdote x. If the other supposedly inferior side has a counterexample anecdote y of the same or greater importance as x, then the original argument has successfully been defused by the whataboutism. It's true that whataboutisms are basically weak, but they are perfect to combat essentially weak anecdotal arguments about one tribe being superior to the other.

            Doctor PhibesD Offline
            Doctor PhibesD Offline
            Doctor Phibes
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @Horace said:

            Nothing logically wrong with a whataboutism argument, as long as it is used to combat a point about one side being preferrable to another because of anecdote x. If the other supposedly inferior side has a counterexample anecdote y of the same or greater importance as x, then the original argument has successfully been defused by the whataboutism. It's true that whataboutisms are basically weak, but they are perfect to combat essentially weak anecdotal arguments about one tribe being superior to the other.

            This is how humanity dies. Not with a bang, but with this really fucking annoying whining sound as we're all sucked into oblivion.

            I was only joking

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Horace

              Nothing logically wrong with a whataboutism argument, as long as it is used to combat a point about one side being preferrable to another because of anecdote x. If the other supposedly inferior side has a counterexample anecdote y of the same or greater importance as x, then the original argument has successfully been defused by the whataboutism. It's true that whataboutisms are basically weak, but they are perfect to combat essentially weak anecdotal arguments about one tribe being superior to the other.

              RenaudaR Offline
              RenaudaR Offline
              Renauda
              wrote last edited by Renauda
              #12

              @Horace

              Nothing logically wrong with a whataboutism argument, as long as it is used to combat a point about one side being preferrable to another because of anecdote x.

              In grade school it was considered an exercise in compare and contrast.

              It's true that whataboutisms are basically weak, but they are perfect to combat essentially weak anecdotal arguments about one tribe being superior to the other.

              They also grow tedious very quickly and turn the debate into two dogs or dog packs barking while simultaneously chasing their own tails

              Elbows up!

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                I hope they tack on another year for that mustache.

                Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  I hope they tack on another year for that mustache.

                  RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote last edited by Renauda
                  #14

                  @jon-nyc

                  I have actually grown fond of Bolton’s distinguished and avuncular Mr. Dithers’ countenance during TV interviews.

                  Elbows up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    Ok then 6-9 months but that’s as low as I’ll go.

                    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                    • HoraceH Horace

                      Nothing logically wrong with a whataboutism argument, as long as it is used to combat a point about one side being preferrable to another because of anecdote x. If the other supposedly inferior side has a counterexample anecdote y of the same or greater importance as x, then the original argument has successfully been defused by the whataboutism. It's true that whataboutisms are basically weak, but they are perfect to combat essentially weak anecdotal arguments about one tribe being superior to the other.

                      Andrea BA Offline
                      Andrea BA Offline
                      Andrea B
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @Horace said:

                      Nothing logically wrong with a whataboutism argument

                      I love you long time.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        Ok then 6-9 months but that’s as low as I’ll go.

                        RenaudaR Offline
                        RenaudaR Offline
                        Renauda
                        wrote last edited by
                        #17

                        @jon-nyc said:

                        Ok then 6-9 months but that’s as low as I’ll go.

                        That’s only because you remember who Mr. Dithers was.

                        Elbows up!

                        1 Reply Last reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups