Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Kennedy Center

Kennedy Center

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
37 Posts 10 Posters 445 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    Make it less tacky at a minimum.

    The arc de Trump on the other hand, should he succeed in building it, should just be razed.

    Andrea BA Offline
    Andrea BA Offline
    Andrea B
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @jon-nyc said:

    Make it less tacky at a minimum.

    The arc de Trump on the other hand, should he succeed in building it, should just be razed.

    Totally agree.

    His obsession with gold is a bit over the top. The oval office has more gold-plated shit than my jewelry box.

    I love you long time.

    AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
    • Andrea BA Andrea B

      @jon-nyc said:

      Make it less tacky at a minimum.

      The arc de Trump on the other hand, should he succeed in building it, should just be razed.

      Totally agree.

      His obsession with gold is a bit over the top. The oval office has more gold-plated shit than my jewelry box.

      AxtremusA Offline
      AxtremusA Offline
      Axtremus
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @Andrea-B said:

      The oval office has more gold-plated shit than my jewelry box.

      Now I am intrigued. If you're willing, please consider sharing pictures of your jewelry box. 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        NobodySock
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        There should never be a building built next to the White House on the taxpayers dollars for a building they will never get to enter.

        Andrea BA 1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          I believe it was Swalwell who gave the Dems running in 2028 an ultimatum that they must vow to raze the ballroom if they want the party's nomination. That will play interestingly to the swing voters. The tribalists will be as dug in as ever, but that goes without saying. A clever opponent with a well run campaign could turn that against them as profligate waste. If I had to guess, the nominee won't actually be running on that, and the ballroom will never be razed. Renamed/renovated, yes.

          Education is extremely important.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • N NobodySock

            There should never be a building built next to the White House on the taxpayers dollars for a building they will never get to enter.

            Andrea BA Offline
            Andrea BA Offline
            Andrea B
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @NobodySock said:

            There should never be a building built next to the White House on the taxpayers dollars for a building they will never get to enter.

            Tell that to Teddy Roosevelt, and Harry Truman.

            At least they didn't install bowling alleys, swimming pools and basketball courts.

            I love you long time.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by jon-nyc
              #19

              I looked up the history of those. More than I knew.

              The original pool was installed by FDR, who, understandably, did his exercise in a pool. Nixon got rid of it. The current press room is over that original pool.

              Ford, who liked to swim, put in an outdoor pool.

              As for the bowling alley, it was a birthday gift for Truman. He didn’t bowl, so mostly White House staff used it. Eisenhower moved it across the street to the EOB. The current situation room sits in part of what was the bowling lanes.

              Nixon loved to bowl so he put in a single lane beneath the north portico driveway.

              Re basketball court - it started with tennis courts put in by Teddy Roosevelt. George HW Bush then added a basketball half court on the same spot while keeping the tennis courts. Obama then added a second hoop and added markings, so the existing court could be used for tennis or full-court basketball.

              The pools and bowling alleys were paid for by private donations. The national park service paid the modest cost of GHWB’s basketball court. ChatGPT and Claude both say that Obama’s expansion of the court, also very modest, was privately funded as well, with Claude suggesting the Obama’s themselves might have paid for it.

              Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Offline
                MikM Offline
                Mik
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                In other words that building has been modified many, many times. This is a tempest in a teapot.

                "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                1 Reply Last reply
                • HoraceH Offline
                  HoraceH Offline
                  Horace
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  Yes it is fantasy to think that no other president could get away with this.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    Renaming Kennedy Center after himself? No other would have tried and, had they done so, would have been blocked by the courts too. The name is defined in legislation that was passed by both houses of Congress and signed by the President.

                    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                    HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                    • Andrea BA Offline
                      Andrea BA Offline
                      Andrea B
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @jon-nyc , you didn't mention the Truman balcony which was not part of the original White House and was added as part of the renovation that occurred during Truman's term.

                      Grok says it was added "for shade and family use."

                      https://insidesources.com/holy-cow-history-the-secret-behind-trumans-famous-balcony/

                      I love you long time.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        Renaming Kennedy Center after himself? No other would have tried and, had they done so, would have been blocked by the courts too. The name is defined in legislation that was passed by both houses of Congress and signed by the President.

                        HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @jon-nyc said:

                        Renaming Kennedy Center after himself? No other would have tried and, had they done so, would have been blocked by the courts too. The name is defined in legislation that was passed by both houses of Congress and signed by the President.

                        I was talking about the ballroom, a tangent from the middle of the thread.

                        The Kennedy renaming is as far as I can tell a troll, and I'm comfy yawning my way through it as those who enjoy the drama pretend to be worried about it.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          I wouldn’t call it a troll. Unless you’re redefining the word. Trump clearly enjoys the idea of having his name on stuff and is looking for more opportunities to do that as the grim reaper nears. Even Penn Station isn’t safe.

                          Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • HoraceH Offline
                            HoraceH Offline
                            Horace
                            wrote last edited by Horace
                            #26

                            Obviously, Trump derives ego gratification in trolling. Specifically, the sort of trolling that gets his shenanigans at the top of the latest news cycle, and at the top of the minds of those who hate him. Such trolling can be dual purpose if it involves other forms of ego gratification, such as putting his name on stuff. Naming is obviously a nothing burger which will be undone as soon as an adversarial admin is voted in. And none of his enemies will be calling it that in writing or in speech anyway. I wonder what excuse the AP will concoct to not call it by the new name, as they concocted an excuse for not using "Gulf of America".

                            Education is extremely important.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • RenaudaR Offline
                              RenaudaR Offline
                              Renauda
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              It’s more than trolling. It’s building his own desired legacy through enforcing his personal sense of entitlement and empowerment to build public works in his name. He is by no means unique among autocrats in this regard.

                              Spit.

                              Elbows up!

                              MikM 1 Reply Last reply
                              • HoraceH Offline
                                HoraceH Offline
                                Horace
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                Yes and he may be delusional enough to think the names will stick. Or not. But the fact that the new name sticks in the craw of his haters is a bonus to the ego gratification of the (temporary) personal branding of some American institutions.

                                Education is extremely important.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #29

                                  So traditionally in internet culture trolls were people who posted shit just to get a reaction from people they wish to tweak. If we expand that to mean posting anything that gets a reaction then most of us become trolls and we probably need a new word for what we used to call trolls. And of course pretty much every action by every administration in partisan times will be a troll.

                                  I suggest we keep the original meaning and chalk up the attempt to broaden it as the typical tribal response of “when our side does something, the other side’s reaction is the story’.

                                  Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • HoraceH Offline
                                    HoraceH Offline
                                    Horace
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #30

                                    Doing something which will stick in the craw of your enemies and evoke a response, such as an outrage cycle in the media, is a troll per se, by the classic definition. As long as the toller knows and enjoys the outrage. Even if the troll is dual purpose for other forms of ego gratification.

                                    Education is extremely important.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor Phibes
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #31

                                      It seems like it's not just the word 'troll' that needs redefining. 'Presidential' has taken on a whole new meaning of late.

                                      I was only joking

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                                        #32

                                        In 1975 Congress chose to name a new federal building in Grand Rapids, MI after then-President Gerald Ford (MI was his home state).

                                        He vetoed the bill. This was his veto message.

                                        I have today vetoed H.R. 11897, a bill which would name the United States Courthouse and Federal Office Building in Grand Rapids, Michigan, the “President Gerald R. Ford Federal Office Building.”

                                        Although I appreciate the honor expressed by the Congress in enacting this legislation, I intend to continue the policy of past Administrations that the executive branch not endorse the naming of Federal office buildings. Generally, the executive branch has deferred to the desires of the Congress on such matters.

                                        However, I know of no Federal office buildings that have been named for a President while still in office. This legislation might begin a precedent I believe it best not to establish.

                                        The proposed naming of this facility for me in my home community is a great honor, and one for which I am deeply grateful; however, for the reasons I have assigned above I feel I cannot sign H.R. 11897.

                                        Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • N Offline
                                          N Offline
                                          NobodySock
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #33

                                          Now there’s a word that doesnt float around the current administration very often - Integrity

                                          1 Reply Last reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups