Today’s fresh hell from academia
-
I'd rather like to look at the original Nature publication than this article to make up my mind, but it's paywalled not not yet available on sci-hub.
In my community, papers are these days almost always reviewed in double-blind style: The authors know nothing about the reviewers and vice versa. That includes names, gender, institution etc.
-
Actually, the article criticizing the Nature publication is also paywalled.
Surely none of you made up their minds by only looking at the tweet?
-
I've heard that females dominating academia has caused a huge culture shift. For instance, they tend to be purely careerist, which means working very hard to succeed within well-established parameters. Unwilling therefore to take risk with original work. Professorships become a grind to check boxes and advance in a hierarchy.
-
Actually, the article criticizing the Nature publication is also paywalled.
Surely none of you made up their minds by only looking at the tweet?
-
Actually, the article criticizing the Nature publication is also paywalled.
Surely none of you made up their minds by only looking at the tweet?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login