Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The quietest billionaire

The quietest billionaire

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
9 Posts 5 Posters 217 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Away
    MikM Away
    Mik
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    This is exactly what I would do in her shoes, or even with a much more modest fortune.

    Jeff Bezos’s ex-wife, MacKenzie Scott, walked away with $38 billion after the divorce.
    What did she do with the money? She gave away $14 billion in 4 years. She’s been giving it away faster than anyone in history.
    MacKenzie Scott could have played the billionaire game: hedge funds, private jets, philanthropy galas. Instead, she rewrote the rulebook.
    Since 2019, she’s given away more than $14 billion to over 1,600 organizations.
    No strings. No naming rights. No 200-page grant proposals. Just trust.
    Community colleges. Food banks. Racial justice groups. Women’s shelters. The kinds of organizations that don’t usually get billionaires on the phone.
    Her model is radical in its simplicity:

    • Give big
    • Give fast
    • Step out of the spotlight
      She doesn’t announce where she’s going next.
      She doesn’t sit on panels.
      She doesn’t even run a foundation.
      She signs a check, walks away, and in a world where philanthropy is often theater, that’s the part that hits hardest. MacKenzie Scott is proving you can change lives at scale without turning it into a performance.
      The quietest billionaire in America might just be the one making the loudest impact.

    alt text

    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

    1 Reply Last reply
    • LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      On the surface, that sounds lovely, but…

      Organizations are like people and many can be ruined by money. The opportunity for fraud and abuse are way too high and even if it’s not outright fraud, it can still lead to mismanagement, which can be just as harmful. Making it rain like Bill at a strip club might be fun, but it’s not necessarily actually accomplishing anything. Those grant applications are a pain in the ass, but they do serve a purpose.

      And her pet project of racial justice groups are often outright evil…

      The Brad

      AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Away
        MikM Away
        Mik
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Still pissed about us beating the Steelers, eh?

        "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

        1 Reply Last reply
        • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

          On the surface, that sounds lovely, but…

          Organizations are like people and many can be ruined by money. The opportunity for fraud and abuse are way too high and even if it’s not outright fraud, it can still lead to mismanagement, which can be just as harmful. Making it rain like Bill at a strip club might be fun, but it’s not necessarily actually accomplishing anything. Those grant applications are a pain in the ass, but they do serve a purpose.

          And her pet project of racial justice groups are often outright evil…

          AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote last edited by Axtremus
          #4

          @LuFins-Dad said in The quietest billionaire:

          Organizations are like people and many can be ruined by money. The opportunity for fraud and abuse are way too high and even if it’s not outright fraud, it can still lead to mismanagement, which can be just as harmful. Making it rain like Bill at a strip club might be fun, but it’s not necessarily actually accomplishing anything. Those grant applications are a pain in the ass, but they do serve a purpose.

          At some point, the donor needs to ask herself, "can I do it better than the current team managing this charity." If you select the charities right, oftentimes the answer is "no," and it then follows that the donor should step aside and let the people who can do it better do it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Away
            MikM Away
            Mik
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Yes, and those same pitfalls are inherent in any human activity. It's not worth considering in this case. I'd bet she's careful about who gets what. I do my own research before I donate, and I'd imagine she has better resources for that.

            "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              She's pretty and classy. He chose right the first time. Some of her choices for where to give her money have been banal social justice nonsense, but I hope her batting average is good.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • kluursK Offline
                kluursK Offline
                kluurs
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                I suspect she's done better than Ruth Lilly who gave a hundred million dollars to the Poetry Foundation. Perhaps a worthy group for a donation - but $100 million?

                1 Reply Last reply
                • AxtremusA Offline
                  AxtremusA Offline
                  Axtremus
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  Will enormous material wealth inspire enormously inspiring poetry?
                  Somebody has to try so we find the answer.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Away
                    MikM Away
                    Mik
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    I bet Aqua would write some classics for that.

                    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups