Charlie Kirk Shot
-
That's a rather unfortunate photograph
-
@jon-nyc said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Open Source Intel is an Israeli account and probably not a big fan.
Outside of her own bizarre group, isn't she disliked in most places?
I was only joking
-
@jon-nyc said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Ask Megyn Kelly
You would struggle to dunk on Megyn if you listened to her comments about Candace. You might even respect her respect for personal ties and friendship, as well as her respect for different minds believing what they believe to be true, often for crazy reasons.
-
@jon-nyc said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Open Source Intel is an Israeli account and probably not a big fan.
Outside of her own bizarre group, isn't she disliked in most places?
@Doctor-Phibes said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@jon-nyc said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Open Source Intel is an Israeli account and probably not a big fan.
Outside of her own bizarre group, isn't she disliked in most places?
She's disliked in every place that dislikes every public figure by default.
The people who populate those places are apparently unaware of how cowardly and nihilistic and meaningless their opinions are.
It's easy to be right by predicting corruption or stupidity in politics and punditry. It's really, really easy.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@jon-nyc said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Open Source Intel is an Israeli account and probably not a big fan.
Outside of her own bizarre group, isn't she disliked in most places?
She's disliked in every place that dislikes every public figure by default.
The people who populate those places are apparently unaware of how cowardly and nihilistic and meaningless their opinions are.
It's easy to be right by predicting corruption or stupidity in politics and punditry. It's really, really easy.
@Horace said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@jon-nyc said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Open Source Intel is an Israeli account and probably not a big fan.
Outside of her own bizarre group, isn't she disliked in most places?
She's disliked in every place that dislikes every public figure by default.
The people who populate those places are apparently unaware of how cowardly and nihilistic and meaningless their opinions are.
It's easy to be right by predicting corruption or stupidity in politics and punditry. It's really, really easy.
Sorry if I'm being dense, but I don't really understand what you're saying. Are you saying it's unfair, cowardly and nihilistic to dislike Candace Owens?
Because I was under the impression that she was nuttier than squirrel shit.
-
Humans are nuttier than squirrel shit, by and large. Those who make a living in punditry and being susceptible to audience capture will often, by virtue of being human, descend into nuttery. There probably isn't any diagnosable mental illness there, and the totality of her messages is never taken into account in these comprehensive evaluations that define her as a cognitive less-than.
But to connect my own evaluation, yes she is nuts with her Brigitte Macron trans opinion. And I suspect that is due to click chasing and audience capture.
Education is extremely important.
-
Humans are nuttier than squirrel shit, by and large. Those who make a living in punditry and being susceptible to audience capture will often, by virtue of being human, descend into nuttery. There probably isn't any diagnosable mental illness there, and the totality of her messages is never taken into account in these comprehensive evaluations that define her as a cognitive less-than.
But to connect my own evaluation, yes she is nuts with her Brigitte Macron trans opinion. And I suspect that is due to click chasing and audience capture.
@Horace said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Humans are nuttier than squirrel shit, by and large. Those who make a living in punditry and being susceptible to audience capture will often, by virtue of being human, descend into nuttery. There probably isn't any diagnosable mental illness there, and the totality of her messages is never taken into account in these comprehensive evaluations that define her as a cognitive less-than.
But to connect my own evaluation, yes she is nuts with her Brigitte Macron trans opinion. And I suspect that is due to click chasing and audience capture.
My take after watching her was they she wasn't nearly as bright as she seemed to think she was. In fact, I'd go as far as saying that she's a bit thick. That's not a medical diagnosis, just a humble opinion based on my layman's perspective. Admittedly this type of opinion may appear nihilistic, cowardly or even, heaven forfend, meaningless. A former poster might prefer the term 'educated beyond her intelligence', but probably not in this specific instance.
-
I've actually never listened to her. My strongest impression about her was when she was standing at Trump's left shoulder in some speech he was giving in his first run. I remarked about how beautiful she was. She has taken some turns, because the culture has given her leverage. It wasn't the culture that directed her, it was her inclinations. She's as crazy as people will be, without boundaries.
