85 years ago today
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
It was a good movie.
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
Think I’ll queue that up to watch with Lucas, tonight.
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by Doctor Phibes
Oh God, I hope the Brexit brigade don't start going on about Churchill and Farage again.
The biggest problem with WW2 is that half of England wants to go back and live in it.
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
21,000,000 million illegals entered America. Let that sink in. That's 21,000,000,000,000. That's around 20 billion COVIDs.
One COVID was enough for me. But I guess the Democrats wanted 19 billion, 999 million, 999 thousand, 999 more.
Count me out.
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
For contrast:
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
Oh, is he back from Maternity Leave?
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
I thought you were against transing people? He took paternity leave like a lot of men.
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by Renauda
My only question is, how the hell did Trumpigula’s X rant get shoehorned into a thread about about Dunkirk?
Sick.
-
My only question is, how the hell did Trumpigula’s X rant get shoehorned into a thread about about Dunkirk?
Sick.
wrote 17 days ago last edited by@Renauda said in 85 years ago today:
... how the hell did Trumpigula’s X rant get shoehorned into a thread about about Dunkirk?
The USA celebrates Memorial Day on the anniversary of Operation Dynamo. Trump's post talks about Memorial Day.
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by jon-nyc
Trump’s post speaks movingly about the debt and gratitude we owe to fallen soldiers. Some 1000 British soldiers died in Operation Dynamo while saving some 340k soldiers from capture or destruction by German forces.
-
My only question is, how the hell did Trumpigula’s X rant get shoehorned into a thread about about Dunkirk?
Sick.
wrote 17 days ago last edited by@Renauda said in 85 years ago today:
My only question is, how the hell did Trumpigula’s X rant get shoehorned into a thread about about Dunkirk?
Sick.
Because I posted it there. Is that ok with you?
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
No
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
I've already sent several draft posts to my editors, which were to be published in the coming days and weeks. I will let them know to remove the sick parts.
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
Trump would have won Dunkirk.
By a lot.
-
Trump would have won Dunkirk.
By a lot.
wrote 17 days ago last edited by RenaudaIn fact, it wouldn’t have happened if Trump were president.
I've already sent several draft posts to my editors, which were to be published in the coming days and weeks. I will let them know to remove the sick parts.
555
-
My only question is, how the hell did Trumpigula’s X rant get shoehorned into a thread about about Dunkirk?
Sick.
wrote 17 days ago last edited by@Renauda said in 85 years ago today:
My only question is, how the hell did Trumpigula’s X rant get shoehorned into a thread about about Dunkirk?
Sick.
It does rather taint an otherwise noble (rare?) thread.
-
Trump would have won Dunkirk.
By a lot.
wrote 17 days ago last edited by jon-nyc@Doctor-Phibes said in 85 years ago today:
Trump would have won Dunkirk.
By a lot.
The fuck you talking about? Trump did win Dunkirk. But it was stolen by the Brits. Or maybe the Germans.
-
@Renauda said in 85 years ago today:
My only question is, how the hell did Trumpigula’s X rant get shoehorned into a thread about about Dunkirk?
Sick.
It does rather taint an otherwise noble (rare?) thread.
wrote 16 days ago last edited by@Mik said in 85 years ago today:
@Renauda said in 85 years ago today:
My only question is, how the hell did Trumpigula’s X rant get shoehorned into a thread about about Dunkirk?
Sick.
It does rather taint an otherwise noble (rare?) thread.
Heh heh heh. He said ‘taint’.
-
wrote 16 days ago last edited by
This thread was too beautiful for this world. I became insanely jealous of it, and in my spite, I tainted it.
-
wrote 16 days ago last edited by
Hater.