Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. What Age to Legally Own a Gun?

What Age to Legally Own a Gun?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
4 Posts 3 Posters 49 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girl
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    https://www.thetrace.org/2025/04/supreme-court-gun-carry-age-minnesota/

    The Supreme Court won’t be settling the question of whether people between the ages of 18 and 20 can be barred from carrying guns in public — at least not for now.
    On April 21, the court declined to hear Worth v. Jacobson, letting stand an appeals court ruling that struck down Minnesota’s age requirements for permits to carry concealed guns.
    A stay had been in place during the appeals process, allowing Minnesota to continue enforcing its age requirements. By denying Minnesota’s request to consider the case, the justices effectively lifted the state’s de facto ban on 18- to 20-year-olds carrying handguns in public. Now, the state must start accepting permit applications from young adults.

    but

    However, a 10th Circuit panel backed a Colorado age restriction last November, and earlier this year, the 11th Circuit upheld Florida’s ban on gun sales to people under 21. The 11th Circuit case is likely to be petitioned to the Supreme Court.
    Megan Walsh, director of the Gun Violence Prevention Law Clinic at the University of Minnesota, said the cases raise several unresolved Second Amendment questions that she expects the justices will eventually want to resolve.
    “I don’t think this is a final answer on age-limit cases from the Supreme Court,” she said about the Minnesota case. “It doesn’t necessarily mean that a majority of justices think that the 8th Circuit approach was correct. I think it might just not be the right vehicle for questions that are going to have to be answered by the Supreme Court sooner rather than later.”

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Yeah circuit split will have to be resolved at some point.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      1 Reply Last reply
      • kluursK Offline
        kluursK Offline
        kluurs
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Wonder how much lobbying by the MS13 PAC.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          More like the MS18-20 PAC.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups