The Iran Nuclear Program thread
-
@jon-nyc said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
Why do I feel like Trump is about to get rolled?
Rolled in what way(s)?
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 02:11 last edited by@Axtremus said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
@jon-nyc said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
Why do I feel like Trump is about to get rolled?
Rolled in what way(s)?
I purposefully wasn't specific. In all the ways one can get rolled.
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 02:24 last edited by
Well it was time to wake up anyway
-
@Axtremus said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
@jon-nyc said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
Why do I feel like Trump is about to get rolled?
Rolled in what way(s)?
I purposefully wasn't specific. In all the ways one can get rolled.
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 02:26 last edited by@jon-nyc said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
@Axtremus said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
@jon-nyc said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
Why do I feel like Trump is about to get rolled?
Rolled in what way(s)?
I purposefully wasn't specific. In all the ways one can get rolled.
Yeah, that’s a wide range of possibilities. And it could still happen.
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 15:18 last edited by
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 16:07 last edited by
So…another historic thread will start to wind down…
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 16:45 last edited by
Hopefully.
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 16:47 last edited by
But I'm very, very interested in the future behavior of the mullahs. If it doesn't squelch the proxies the job is not done yet.
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 17:26 last edited by
They'll turn inwards on their own population to prevent any progressive reform in Iran
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 19:39 last edited by
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 20:16 last edited by
Yeah, it’s a bit optimistic but still a pretty clear eyed look at where things are.
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 21:49 last edited by
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 22:24 last edited by Mik
If you'll recall, this was exactly my objection to our involvement - possible failure to destroy Fordow.
Now, it is absolutely true that some powers will try very hard to portray that as true, whether it is or not. Finding the truth might be difficult, but we'll be keeping an eye on the sites.
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 23:00 last edited by
In all likelihood it’s somewhere in between. What do they mean by months? 3? Or 120?
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 23:14 last edited by
6 said the report.
While the question of who/what to believe is ever present, before the Defense Intelligence Agency report was leaked congressmen were already publicly complaining that the Administration canceled a planned briefing.
-
wrote on 24 Jun 2025, 23:28 last edited by
I thought they were years away from a bomb, according to Tulsi?
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2025, 01:20 last edited by
Trump has spent the last couple of hours making multiple posts how the bombs obliterated everything.... which probably means they didn't... sigh...
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2025, 01:33 last edited by
Our problem is no believable source.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2025, 10:33 last edited by
Iranian government have arrested 700 people to suppress dissent.
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2025, 10:52 last edited by
@Mik said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
Our problem is no believable source.
Do you miss the day when Obama announced "we got Bin Laden" on TV and the world just believed him?
-
wrote on 25 Jun 2025, 11:35 last edited by
@Mik said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
Our problem is no believable source.
That's the problem, we don't have a clue who's telling the truth. Or even if anyone knows what the truth is. Every news station trots out their retired 3 or 4 star general (I don't even listen to colonels) or atomic energy PhD and no two has the same opinion about anything.
I am somewhat partial to Rebecca Grant PhD over at Fox, though. She gets all excited and squeaky when she's talking about Tomahawk missiles being fired off.
