Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Best way to digitize old photographs?

Best way to digitize old photographs?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
9 Posts 4 Posters 71 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Away
    MikM Away
    Mik
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I need to get on this someday. Any suggestions?

    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
      #2

      I bought a scanner that could automatically scan multiple photos at once and save them to individual files automatically. That way I could do 10 per minute or so.

      I looked into services but they would sort by size when they ran them through their machines so they wouldn’t come back in the same order.

      This is hugely important because, with old photos, the set they’re with offer clues as to what’s in each photo. Example - if I see a bunch of pictures from a vacation in 1974 I can tell we visited my aunt and so when I see a house alone in a photo, I know it’s hers. But if you just hand me that photo by itself with no context I’ll have no idea what it is. True for more remote family members too.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Away
        MikM Away
        Mik
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Yeah, the one principle I know is organize before you scan. The services are pretty pricey for something I can do. My thinking is do that, then do a full scanner load of multiple photos. You can always snip out individual ones you might want to send, etc.

        What scanner did you get? Just a large bed one?

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          A large bed cannon. I don’t have it anymore. I did this after my parents died in 2008-2011.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            My printer is a scanner now but I no longer have any big scanning projects as I finished it years ago

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            1 Reply Last reply
            • W Offline
              W Offline
              Wim
              wrote on last edited by Wim
              #6

              I scanned about 500 photo's with a flatbed, one by one at 600dpi. Goes pretty slow, but quality is way better than 300 dpi, especially when you want to enlarge/zoom in on details.
              I tried scanning with 10 photo's at a time, but I got too many blurred or partially scanned results.
              It was time consuming, but I'm happy with the results.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I did the highest resolution available and saved them as tiff files.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • MikM Away
                  MikM Away
                  Mik
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Yeah, I think higher resolution has to be better.

                  “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • taiwan_girlT Offline
                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                    taiwan_girl
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    https://epson.com/For-Home/Scanners/Photo-Scanners/Epson-Perfection-V600-Photo-Scanner/p/B11B198011

                    I have this one. I used to try and take pictures only with film camera. I did save most of my negatives, and the above scanner can to negative also with photos.

                    Like @Wim I did the photos one by one at high settings. Seemed to work best for me.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups