Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Praising him with faint damn

Praising him with faint damn

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
26 Posts 11 Posters 248 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      My guess is he’ll promote his son as successor. If he’s still alive. And after he gives up on a third term.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      1 Reply Last reply
      • RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote on last edited by Renauda
        #3

        The Emporer Trumpigula.

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins Dad
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Nope. Youngkin.

          The Brad

          1 Reply Last reply
          • HoraceH Offline
            HoraceH Offline
            Horace
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I had my heart set on Vance.

            Education is extremely important.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • Tom-KT Offline
              Tom-KT Offline
              Tom-K
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I think it's Vance. The "no" was to prevent Vance from getting to uppity.

              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • Tom-KT Tom-K

                I think it's Vance. The "no" was to prevent Vance from getting to uppity.

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @Tom-K said in Praising him with faint damn:

                I think it's Vance. The "no" was to prevent Vance from getting to uppity.

                I think you're right.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                1 Reply Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Online
                  Doctor PhibesD Online
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                  #8

                  What does 'successor' mean?

                  Maybe Vance will turn out to be a kind of Richard III character. Both of Trump's adult sons will suddenly and mysteriously vanish, leaving only a trail of expensive and over-done cologne to give a hint of their whereabouts. Vance will suddenly divorce the current Mrs. Vance and wed Melania in a huge public celebration of something really weird, and then into view will come the Mighty Lurch, the third son, 7 feet tall and pissed, destroying all before him....

                  Well it could happen.

                  I was only joking

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    When Trump was vetting people for VP, the word was he was looking for certain things...

                    1. Loyalty, of course.
                    2. Belief in his economic program
                    3. Belief in a fundamental change to the GOP, making it more populist and blue collar.
                    4. The ability and willingness to fight with the press and The Swamp.
                    5. A possible successor.

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Meh.

                      It's all transitory.

                      I remember when Tony Blair was going to change the world. Anybody know what he's doing now?

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Back up far enough and everything is transitory except God.

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                        • JollyJ Jolly

                          Back up far enough and everything is transitory except God.

                          Doctor PhibesD Online
                          Doctor PhibesD Online
                          Doctor Phibes
                          wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                          #12

                          @Jolly said in Praising him with faint damn:

                          Back up far enough and everything is transitory except God.

                          Mankind has been here for millions of years. God was invented/discovered (depending on your beliefs) about 4000 years ago. So that claim doesn't really hold.

                          Alternatively - what was the big fella doing for all those millions of years when dinosaurs ruled the earth? Not much, if you belief the blokes in silly hats.

                          I was only joking

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • JollyJ Offline
                            JollyJ Offline
                            Jolly
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Alpha and Omega, babe.

                            Before the foundations of the world...

                            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • Doctor PhibesD Online
                              Doctor PhibesD Online
                              Doctor Phibes
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              I think there's some serious questions here. The biblical stories really kind of assume not a whole lot happened before mankind arrived, and that's really not true.

                              Unless of course you believe that stuff about dinosaur fossils being placed there to test our faith, which feels faintly ridiculous.

                              Anyway, getting back to Tony Blair, the point is, nobody has a clue what he's doing now. Hopefully the same will be said of Don Jnr and that other brother whose name I can't recall in 10 years time.

                              I was only joking

                              bachophileB 1 Reply Last reply
                              • RenaudaR Offline
                                RenaudaR Offline
                                Renauda
                                wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                #15

                                Ah yes, when challenged employ the trusty old Acme Alpha and Omega Spackle gospel and parable.

                                Elbows up!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • Doctor PhibesD Online
                                  Doctor PhibesD Online
                                  Doctor Phibes
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  I don't think Alpha and Omega really existed before the Greeks. The stoneage people probably referred to them as grunk and gronk, or something similarly edifying.

                                  And Christ alone knows what the dinosaurs thought about all this nonsense.

                                  I was only joking

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • RenaudaR Offline
                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    Renauda
                                    wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                    #17

                                    And Christ alone knows what the dinosaurs thought about all this nonsense.

                                    Probably very little.

                                    The big question is how Neanderthals and other prehistoric hominids perceived the natural world or whether they even bothered to give it much thought.

                                    Elbows up!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins Dad
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      My understanding is that Vance was never meant to be the heir apparent, though it has been presented that way.

                                      The Brad

                                      AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                        My understanding is that Vance was never meant to be the heir apparent, though it has been presented that way.

                                        AxtremusA Offline
                                        AxtremusA Offline
                                        Axtremus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @LuFins-Dad said in Praising him with faint damn:

                                        My understanding is that Vance was never meant to be the heir apparent, though it has been presented that way.

                                        So ... like Kamala?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          AndyD
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Blair and Trump(CF) have much in common. Property aquistion (with family legacy that goes along with it) seem the Blairs' main concern.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups