Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. GLP-1 agonists to be among 15 drugs subject to Medicare price negotiations

GLP-1 agonists to be among 15 drugs subject to Medicare price negotiations

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
26 Posts 6 Posters 121 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Channeling RFK?

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      I don’t blame it all on FD&C Yellow #5.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        And channeling RFK would be to outline a nanny-state plan to ban unhealthy foods and perfectly fine foods about which I’ve contrived conspiracy theories.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          @jon-nyc ChatGPT, that's a good summary.

          No question, in my mind, that larger portions and overall increased caloric intake are major driving forces. People have been talking about HFCS as being a problem for a long time. Is there any science that processed foods and HFCS are drivers of obesity by themselves? Or are they part of the portion and calorie stuff.

          I remember reading how much sugar is in something we thought of as "healthy" - Cheerios, I believe. The amount of sugar and salt in it was amazing.

          I saw a story that one fast food chain - In-And-Out? - was switching to beef tallow for their french fries.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Away
            MikM Away
            Mik
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            And the pendulum swings. Another factor is far more sedentary work.

            “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              I don’t blame it all on FD&C Yellow #5.

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              @jon-nyc said in GLP-1 agonists to be among 15 drugs subject to Medicare price negotiations:

              I don’t blame it all on FD&C Yellow #5.

              BTW, one of the red dyes bit the dust this week.

              RFK effect?

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG George K

                @jon-nyc ChatGPT, that's a good summary.

                No question, in my mind, that larger portions and overall increased caloric intake are major driving forces. People have been talking about HFCS as being a problem for a long time. Is there any science that processed foods and HFCS are drivers of obesity by themselves? Or are they part of the portion and calorie stuff.

                I remember reading how much sugar is in something we thought of as "healthy" - Cheerios, I believe. The amount of sugar and salt in it was amazing.

                I saw a story that one fast food chain - In-And-Out? - was switching to beef tallow for their french fries.

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                @George-K said in GLP-1 agonists to be among 15 drugs subject to Medicare price negotiations:

                I saw a story that one fast food chain - In-And-Out? - was switching to beef tallow for their french fries.

                McDonalds did that for years. Wonder if they'll switch back?

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  And channeling RFK would be to outline a nanny-state plan to ban unhealthy foods and perfectly fine foods about which I’ve contrived conspiracy theories.

                  CopperC Online
                  CopperC Online
                  Copper
                  wrote on last edited by Copper
                  #24

                  @jon-nyc said in GLP-1 agonists to be among 15 drugs subject to Medicare price negotiations:

                  a nanny-state plan to ban unhealthy foods and perfectly fine foods about which I’ve contrived conspiracy theories.

                  I'd rather see some people die young from eating unhealthy food.

                  The Nanny-state is bad, even when it protects us from real danger.

                  Of course we have to be informed, beyond that it is none of the government's business.

                  Now, who wants to pay for healthcare for all those fat people?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG Offline
                    George KG Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    Norm...

                    Link to video

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      Me: What’s the next generation of weight loss drugs after GLP-1 agonists.

                      ChstGPT:

                      The landscape of weight loss medications is rapidly evolving beyond traditional GLP-1 receptor agonists, with several promising developments on the horizon:

                      1. Multi-Receptor Agonists:
                        • Dual and Triple Agonists: Pharmaceutical companies are developing drugs that target multiple receptors to enhance weight loss efficacy. For instance, Eli Lilly’s retatrutide is a “triple G” agonist that activates GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors. In mid-stage trials, participants achieved up to 24.2% weight loss over 48 weeks, marking significant progress in obesity treatment. 

                      2. Amylin Analogues:
                        • Amylin-Based Therapies: Drugs like cagrilintide and petrelintide mimic the hormone amylin, which promotes a feeling of fullness after eating. These therapies offer an alternative mechanism to existing GLP-1-based treatments and have shown promise in early trials. 

                      3. Oral GLP-1 Receptor Agonists:
                        • Convenient Pill Forms: Efforts are underway to develop effective oral GLP-1 receptor agonists. Eli Lilly’s orforglipron and Pfizer’s danuglipron are notable examples, aiming to provide the benefits of GLP-1 therapies without the need for injections. 

                      4. Novel Targets and Mechanisms:
                        • NK2R Agonists: Researchers at the University of Copenhagen, funded by Novo Nordisk, have identified the neurokinin 2 receptor (NK2R) as a potential target for weight loss drugs. Early studies suggest that NK2R agonists can decrease appetite and increase calorie burning without causing nausea, a common side effect of current treatments. Clinical trials are anticipated to begin within a year, with potential public availability in five to six years. 

                      These advancements reflect a concerted effort to develop more effective, convenient, and tolerable weight loss medications, addressing the diverse needs of individuals seeking obesity treatment.

                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      @jon-nyc said in GLP-1 agonists to be among 15 drugs subject to Medicare price negotiations:

                      Me: What’s the next generation of weight loss drugs after GLP-1 agonists.

                      ChstGPT:

                      1. Multi-Receptor Agonists:
                        • Dual and Triple Agonists: Pharmaceutical companies are developing drugs that target multiple receptors to enhance weight loss efficacy. For instance, Eli Lilly’s retatrutide is a “triple G” agonist that activates GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors. In mid-stage trials, participants achieved up to 24.2% weight loss over 48 weeks, marking significant progress in obesity treatment. 

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups