Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Biden: No more judges!

Biden: No more judges!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
7 Posts 4 Posters 40 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Unless they're on the Supreme Court, of course.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-passes-bipartisan-judges-bill-biden-vowed-veto-rcna183970

    The House of Representatives on Thursday passed a bipartisan bill backed by the federal judiciary that would create dozens of new judgeships despite President Joe Biden's pledge to veto it.

    The legislation has already passed the Senate with bipartisan support and was considered to be uncontroversial — until President-elect Donald Trump won the election last month.

    House Democratic Whip Katherine Clark, of Massachusetts, sent a note before the vote Thursday urging colleagues to vote against the bill.

    “While this bill attempts to provide a solution to our backlogged court system, House Democrats should remain clear-eyed on what authorizing a significant number of new, empty judgeships means under a future Trump Administration,” she wrote.

    The bill passed the House on a 236-173 vote Thursday, with 29 Democrats voting in favor and two Republicans voting against. It passed the Senate by unanimous consent in August.

    Screenshot 2024-12-12 at 11.30.59 AM.png

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Offline
      HoraceH Offline
      Horace
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      So the Trump admin will have to pass it again?

      Education is extremely important.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        The rest of the article:

        “At that time, Democrats supported the bill — they thought Kamala Harris would win the presidency,” House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said in a statement. “Now, however, the Biden-Harris Administration has chosen to issue a veto threat and Democrats have whipped against this bill, standing in the way of progress, simply because of partisan politics.”

        The bill would add 66 new district court judgeships as requested by the federal judiciary itself in order to alleviate bottlenecks in the court system.

        Although Democrats have complained that the bill will give Trump more judgeships to fill, the new judgeships would be staggered over time, meaning that he would have an opportunity to appoint only 25 of the 66.

        The bill was specifically designed to be nonpartisan and would be the first major expansion of judgeships since 1990.

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          It passed the senate unanimously I believe. They should be able to get an override.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            It passed the senate unanimously I believe. They should be able to get an override.

            George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @jon-nyc said in Biden: No more judges!:

            It passed the senate unanimously I believe. They should be able to get an override.

            Yes. But, if Johnson's assessment is correct, this happened when Harris was the rising star.

            Also, I doubt 2/3 of the House will vote to override.

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • taiwan_girlT Offline
              taiwan_girlT Offline
              taiwan_girl
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              How much time did they spend to come up with the acronym for the bill? LOL

              1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote on last edited by Horace
                #7

                I notice the OMB letterhead. That's the office that'll be led by Russ Vought, who many tribal wonks consider to be the single most terrifying pick by Trump so far. Apparently he's a Christian Nationalist fascist, but also competent, which is his most terrifying aspect.

                Education is extremely important.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups