Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Blow Hard

Blow Hard

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
9 Posts 3 Posters 27 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    If it does, you go faster...

    https://apnews.com/article/climate-clean-shipping-sail-carbon-emissions-environment-0c191cb3674e157e66f65c8e58e7c0ce

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      The most successful of the Age of Sail?

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preussen_(ship)

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Offline
        MikM Offline
        Mik
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Interesting idea, but it adds 3-4 days to an Atlantic crossing. The other thing I wondered about was the fiberglass panel sails. Are they retractable? Could they be a problem in storms?

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I've said before, one of my in-laws neighbors is a container ship captain. His run is Houston -Antwerp - Houston. A few years back he changed course to avoid a very bad storm and lost one day in transit.

          He was brought up in front of management and reprimanded.

          But when looking at wind and the type of cargo these ships could carry, the fuel saving might pay for the 2-3 days longer transit time.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins Dad
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            They are carrying 300 tons of cargo the biggest of their type is carrying 1000 tons. The container ships are carrying 200,000 tons…

            If you want to make this work, you have to explore what advantages this really offers and you may have to rethink the entire approach of shipping for many companies.

            You also need to explore why sailing ships disappeared from commercial freight and gave way to the massive freighters and whether your model actually accounts for those original shortcomings.

            If you can change the approach and promote these ships as being smaller and more nimble, capable of visiting shallower and closer ports, maybe traversing larger rivers to come further inland to reduce land freight… Then you might have something, but it’s doubtful. The simple fact is that the scale is all off. It’s really nothing more than a vanity project.

            The Brad

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              It could, however, be scaled up for larger ships.

              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

              1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                One of the reasons sailing ships disappeared was the cost of labor. Takes a lot of hands to sail a square-rigger. I think these new designs take a lot less labor.

                I don't know if a new breed of sailing ship could be feasible. I do like the idea of more and smaller ports, perhaps negating some of the cost of inland transport.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  One of the reasons sailing ships disappeared was the cost of labor. Takes a lot of hands to sail a square-rigger. I think these new designs take a lot less labor.

                  I don't know if a new breed of sailing ship could be feasible. I do like the idea of more and smaller ports, perhaps negating some of the cost of inland transport.

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @Jolly said in Blow Hard:

                  One of the reasons sailing ships disappeared was the cost of labor. Takes a lot of hands to sail a square-rigger. I think these new designs take a lot less labor.

                  I don't know if a new breed of sailing ship could be feasible. I do like the idea of more and smaller ports, perhaps negating some of the cost of inland transport.

                  Same reason I'd like to see a return to more rail and less trucking. Maybe less inland transportation cost.

                  Also, I think mixed rail should make a comeback.

                  Hey, maybe our cargo sailing ships can also have guest (tourist) cabins...

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Those rotary sail installations on the massive cargo ships are likely to have a bigger aggregate impact, and they only reduce diesel fuel consumption and emissions by 6%.

                    The Brad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups