Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Motivated Voters

Motivated Voters

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
17 Posts 5 Posters 255 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    What I got from ChatGPT.

    The observation of voter turnout percentages exceeding 100% in some Boston precincts is due to the method used to calculate these figures. Boston’s Election Department bases turnout percentages on the number of ballot cards scanned, with each voter potentially submitting multiple cards. This approach can result in turnout percentages that appear to exceed 100%, as noted in the city’s election results disclaimer:

    “Note: Percentages are based on a two-card per voter scan, therefore the percentage is not accurate if divided in half. It’s just an estimated turnout.” 

    This calculation method can lead to turnout figures that surpass 100%, especially in precincts with high voter participation. It’s important to recognize that these percentages are estimates and may not precisely reflect the actual number of individual voters.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
      #9

      I couldn’t get a real sample ballot for these Boston wards, despite going to a state website that promised to do just that based on address.

      When I figured out an address that was in the ward and precinct with the highest turnout (18/1, which had 263%) and clicked on ‘show ballot’, the website returned this:

      https://www.sec.state.ma.us/WhereDoIVoteMA/ShowBallot/ViewMyBallot/BallotOut/ST/35/18/1

      Yeah I can see that being in multiple pages (cards).

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Why use multiple cards, unless you want to cheat?

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          If this is correct, it’s basically a multi-page ballot. Not repeats of a ballot.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Away
            MikM Away
            Mik
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Still fucked up. Avoid all appearance.

            “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              It's a bug in whatever code calculated the % turnout. Debug that code and problem solved.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Away
                MikM Away
                Mik
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                Offshoring coders no doubt.

                “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  I couldn’t get a real sample ballot for these Boston wards, despite going to a state website that promised to do just that based on address.

                  When I figured out an address that was in the ward and precinct with the highest turnout (18/1, which had 263%) and clicked on ‘show ballot’, the website returned this:

                  https://www.sec.state.ma.us/WhereDoIVoteMA/ShowBallot/ViewMyBallot/BallotOut/ST/35/18/1

                  Yeah I can see that being in multiple pages (cards).

                  CopperC Offline
                  CopperC Offline
                  Copper
                  wrote on last edited by Copper
                  #15

                  @jon-nyc said in Motivated Voters:

                  When I figured out an address that was in the ward and precinct

                  That ballot tells the story.

                  I recognize 2 of the names I assume they are the next generation of politicians I knew there 50 years ago, Iannella and Hennigan. One lives just a few houses down from my grandparents (former) house, the other just a couple blocks away.

                  And notice that almost every office has an unopposed democrat running.

                  I tell people that where I grew up I didn't even see a republican in real life until I was a teenager.

                  There is no need to cheat, the dem will win.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Away
                    MikM Away
                    Mik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    My county is the exact opposite.

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      Here there’s opposition except sometimes very local (town) races will be dem only. But not always.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups