Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Hegseth "incident."

The Hegseth "incident."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
183 Posts 14 Posters 5.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #94

    Washington Post yesterday:

    Such awards were issued somewhat liberally throughout the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, experts say. Awardees of the meritorious service medal are predominantly military officers like Hegseth, data provided by the military shows. While many officers have risked their lives on the battlefield, the majority of fighting and exposure to danger is performed by the enlisted troops they command.

    Ah...wait, he DID serve in combat the explain.

    Hegseth also received a Combat Infantryman Badge, which is awarded when infantry soldiers and officers engage an enemy in combat.

    For the Washington Post in 2018 a Bronze Star was something to be mentioned, a lot. And they don't comment that it was issued "liberally."

    GeFFdWnWoAACf2v.jpeg

    GeFFdWoXoAAZWrA.jpeg

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor Phibes
      wrote on last edited by
      #95

      Imagine undermining and denigrating a former combat soldiers experience like that just for political reasons. Shameful!

      I was only joking

      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
      • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

        Imagine undermining and denigrating a former combat soldiers experience like that just for political reasons. Shameful!

        George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #96

        @Doctor-Phibes said in The Hegseth "incident.":

        Imagine undermining and denigrating a former combat soldiers experience like that just for political reasons. Shameful!

        If Hegseth gets confirmed, and I have my doubts, at least he won't go AWOL for 7-10 days without telling POTUS.

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
        • taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on last edited by
          #97

          https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5024462-blumenthal-republican-senators-hegseth/?email=467cb6399cb7df64551775e431052b43a775c749&emaila=12a6d4d069cd56cfddaa391c24eb7042&emailb=054528e7403871c79f668e49dd3c44b1ec00c7f611bf9388f76bb2324d6ca5f3&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=12.05.24. — Defense %26 National Security

          From Sen. Blumenthal

          “The power of the presidency, not to mention this president-elect, and what the retribution might be, I think, is pretty daunting, and so I think Republicans are reluctant to step forward and be the first one, but I think privately, they’re much readier to advise the president that the better part of wisdom would be to urge withdrawal of this nomination.”

          “I’d be surprised if we’re still talking about Hegseth at the end of the week or by Monday,” Blumenthal added.

          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
          • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

            https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5024462-blumenthal-republican-senators-hegseth/?email=467cb6399cb7df64551775e431052b43a775c749&emaila=12a6d4d069cd56cfddaa391c24eb7042&emailb=054528e7403871c79f668e49dd3c44b1ec00c7f611bf9388f76bb2324d6ca5f3&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=12.05.24. — Defense %26 National Security

            From Sen. Blumenthal

            “The power of the presidency, not to mention this president-elect, and what the retribution might be, I think, is pretty daunting, and so I think Republicans are reluctant to step forward and be the first one, but I think privately, they’re much readier to advise the president that the better part of wisdom would be to urge withdrawal of this nomination.”

            “I’d be surprised if we’re still talking about Hegseth at the end of the week or by Monday,” Blumenthal added.

            George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #98

            @taiwan_girl said in The Hegseth "incident.":

            Sen. Blumenthal

            The guy who pretended to be a VietNam vet....

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG George K

              @Doctor-Phibes said in The Hegseth "incident.":

              Imagine undermining and denigrating a former combat soldiers experience like that just for political reasons. Shameful!

              If Hegseth gets confirmed, and I have my doubts, at least he won't go AWOL for 7-10 days without telling POTUS.

              Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote on last edited by
              #99

              @George-K said in The Hegseth "incident.":

              @Doctor-Phibes said in The Hegseth "incident.":

              Imagine undermining and denigrating a former combat soldiers experience like that just for political reasons. Shameful!

              If Hegseth gets confirmed, and I have my doubts, at least he won't go AWOL for 7-10 days without telling POTUS.

              Let's hope he doesn't get taken prisoner. Trump hates that.

              I was only joking

              1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #100

                Time for introspection...

                The military industrial arms business is a trillion dollar business. The Defense Department is ripe with inefficiencies and crony politics. Money flows through the system in a torrent and nobody even tries to account for the individual drops. Corporations and individuals are getting filthy rich.

                So ask yourself...Why the concerted push to kill the nomination?

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                Tom-KT 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #101

                  Because he’s obviously unqualified and a bit of a tool.

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  JollyJ taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    Because he’s obviously unqualified and a bit of a tool.

                    JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #102

                    @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                    Because he’s obviously unqualified and a bit of a tool.

                    Because he may have problems, but there's a hatchet job going on. All the won't go on the record sources scream it.

                    Why?

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Jolly

                      Time for introspection...

                      The military industrial arms business is a trillion dollar business. The Defense Department is ripe with inefficiencies and crony politics. Money flows through the system in a torrent and nobody even tries to account for the individual drops. Corporations and individuals are getting filthy rich.

                      So ask yourself...Why the concerted push to kill the nomination?

                      Tom-KT Offline
                      Tom-KT Offline
                      Tom-K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #103

                      @Jolly said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                      Time for introspection...

                      So ask yourself...Why the concerted push to kill the nomination?

                      It seems that's just the way these things go for Republicans. Kavanaugh was kicked pretty hard because of a high school party that he might or not have attended, Barrett was attacked for going to church on Sunday.

                      Yet the Democrats have guys like this in positions of power.

                      51983613-3ca0-47d7-9440-98d7196df5ee-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by Jolly
                        #104

                        Listened to a guy today, filling in for Hannity. He said he'd done the weekend Fox & Friends show multiple times and had never detected any alcohol on Pete. He reached out this week to the other two hosts on the show, and both denied being contacted by anybody about Pete, and both stated they had never smelled alcohol on Pete.

                        Furthermore, they talked about show prep and performance. Hegseth seems to always be prepared and has never had any type of on-air problem.

                        Unnamed sources, indeed.

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • JollyJ Offline
                          JollyJ Offline
                          Jolly
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #105

                          Again, women may be what sinks Hegseth.

                          But let it be named sources...

                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                            Because he’s obviously unqualified and a bit of a tool.

                            taiwan_girlT Offline
                            taiwan_girlT Offline
                            taiwan_girl
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #106

                            @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                            Because he’s obviously unqualified....

                            This. As I said when he was first nominated, who can objectively look at his resume and say with a straight face that his background makes him qualified to run a multi billion dollar "company" with hundreds of thousands of employees.

                            HoraceH JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
                            • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                              @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                              Because he’s obviously unqualified....

                              This. As I said when he was first nominated, who can objectively look at his resume and say with a straight face that his background makes him qualified to run a multi billion dollar "company" with hundreds of thousands of employees.

                              HoraceH Offline
                              HoraceH Offline
                              Horace
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #107

                              @taiwan_girl said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                              @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                              Because he’s obviously unqualified....

                              This. As I said when he was first nominated, who can objectively look at his resume and say with a straight face that his background makes him qualified to run a multi billion dollar "company" with hundreds of thousands of employees.

                              Do you really think secretaries of <whatever large governmental organization> in past administrations are mostly people qualified to be CEOs of large private companies? I mean, I haven't checked, but I would assume they don't often have those resumes either. Would a day in the life of a cabinet member be similar to a day in the life of a CEO? I don't know. I do know that the current secretary took 8 days off without telling anybody, and he almost got away with nobody even noticing.

                              Education is extremely important.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                                @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                Because he’s obviously unqualified....

                                This. As I said when he was first nominated, who can objectively look at his resume and say with a straight face that his background makes him qualified to run a multi billion dollar "company" with hundreds of thousands of employees.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #108

                                @taiwan_girl said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                Because he’s obviously unqualified....

                                This. As I said when he was first nominated, who can objectively look at his resume and say with a straight face that his background makes him qualified to run a multi billion dollar "company" with hundreds of thousands of employees.

                                Lloyd Austin was "qualified" and look what you have...

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins Dad
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #109

                                  As Sec Def, Hegseth would have fewer people reporting to him on a daily basis than he did as a Major.

                                  I think what your concern is, @taiwan_girl , is that Hegseth’s experience as a Major was more tactical while the role of Sec Def is more strategic in nature. I would counter that his training and education in public policy prepares him for the strategic role and his background in tactical command gives him a unique perspective and an advantage over Sec Defs that only ever sat in leadership, never in tactical or even operational roles.

                                  The Brad

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • LuFins DadL Offline
                                    LuFins DadL Offline
                                    LuFins Dad
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #110

                                    No Hegseth has the chops in Public Policy. It’s his Pubic Policy that’s the problem.

                                    The Brad

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • George KG Offline
                                      George KG Offline
                                      George K
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #111

                                      This, and other administrations, have shown us that managerial experience in the field in which you worked has no bearing on ability in the field to which you are nominated.

                                      See: Becerra
                                      See: Buttigieg

                                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                      taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • George KG George K

                                        This, and other administrations, have shown us that managerial experience in the field in which you worked has no bearing on ability in the field to which you are nominated.

                                        See: Becerra
                                        See: Buttigieg

                                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                                        taiwan_girl
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #112

                                        @George-K I would have said (and maybe I did) the same thing about those two.

                                        @Horace said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                        Do you really think secretaries of <whatever large governmental organization> in past administrations are mostly people qualified to be CEOs of large private companies?

                                        That is not my point. It is not a matter of "were they qualified", but more "should they be qualified". Yes running a government department is not the same as being a CEO of a large company. I would say that it is even harder because of the more interference from outside sources. There is, however, quite a bit of overlap in the necessary skills.

                                        @Jolly said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                        Lloyd Austin was "qualified" and look what you have...

                                        Just like every CEO does not succeed. But, the odds are greater the more qualified you are. To use a US football analogy. If you were hiring a new college football coach, would you be more likely to look at other former college coaches or would you hire a youth football coach from the local high school?

                                        @LuFins-Dad I get what you are saying, but I am not sure that direct report is a good indicator. You probably have more direct reports than the Sec. of Defense. I just dont think he has the strategic and maybe as important, the knowledge of managing organizational things.

                                        Anyways, it will be interesting. You guys have made good points, but not enough to make me vote in favor of his confirmation. 555

                                        HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • JollyJ Offline
                                          JollyJ Offline
                                          Jolly
                                          wrote on last edited by Jolly
                                          #113

                                          You hire the coach that works.

                                          Sometimes, that means a high school coach goes to college. Many times, a college coach goes to the pros.

                                          A lot depends upon what you want to do. The wing T, wishbone, veer option, West Coast or air raid offense...None were developed in the pros. Some even came from high school coaches.

                                          TG's argument assumes that a qualified SecDef comes from the military industrial complex...Trump is trying to overhaul the military, make it more efficient and more lethal...Yet, she wants to hire somebody from the pack to oversee the pack.

                                          No, you need an outsider. But you don't want a McNamara. Look how that worked out.

                                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups