The CATO Ten
-
https://www.cato.org/blog/10-spending-cuts-president-trump
Excerpt:
K‑12 public school subsidies. President George W. Bush favored federal subsidies and top-down rules for the nation’s K‑12 schools. That approach failed, and Republicans now know that the future of K‑12 is state-driven school choice. The pandemic-era public school shutdowns bolstered the case for choice. The time is ripe to zero-out federal aid for public schools to save more than $30 billion a year.
Urban transit subsidies. Many urban rail systems attract few riders and cost far more than promised. Locally funded bus systems are a more efficient solution for moderate-income commuters. Trump should zero out $20 billion a year in federal subsidies for urban transit.
Foreign aid. The federal budget includes $47 billion for international aid programs in 2024. There is a lot of waste in foreign aid that should be cut. Poor countries grow their economies by market-based reforms, not by aid.
Green subsidies. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 is costing the budget about $100 billion a year in green energy tax breaks and subsidies. The expected cost of the bill has ballooned since it passed, and we are finding out that wind power, solar power, lithium batteries, and electric vehicles themselves cause environmental harm.
Broadband subsidies. The 2021 infrastructure bill added $65 billion in broadband subsidies, which came on top of more than $100 billion of broadband subsidies since the 1990s. New spending should be cancelled, as satellite internet service is now available everywhere.
Public housing and rental subsidies. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) hands out $55 billion a year for public housing and rental aid. This spending should be zeroed out, public housing should be privatized, and local governments should deregulate land use to spur private housing construction.
Community development grants. HUD hands out $21 billion a year to cities and counties for street projects, business subsides, arts facilities, and the like. These activities should be funded by local governments and the private sector.Junk food subsidies. Trump partner Robert F. Kennedy Jr. favors cutting food stamp spending on junk food, which accounts for almost one-quarter of the $100 billion annual cost of the program. Junk food subsidies make no sense given America’s obesity crisis.
Farm subsidies for the rich. Trump and the Republicans generally support farm subsidies, but it should be politically feasible to cut aid to the wealthiest farmers. About 60 percent of the benefits from the three largest programs go to the top 10 percent of farms. Cuts would save billions of dollars a year.
Medicaid. This health program has grown explosively because the federal government subsidizes state program expansion in an uncontrolled manner. The government could save $300 billion a year within a decade by imposing a hard cap on aid to each state.
-
Wow. The waste of time reading that was only exceeded by the waste of time somebody spent writing that.
-
I generally agree that HUD doesn’t work, but I doubt you see movement under Trump.
-
I can see that happening.
-
The Urban Transit Subsidies always supposed that urban rail was fiscally a loser but was ultimately still too important and is needed.
-
You might have enough leverage to wipe out the Department of Education, but you don’t have the public support to cut Federal school funding.
-
-
Not at all. The money would need to be replaced and in most locations that would mean a property tax increase that would be notable and directly ascribable to that action. Wouldn’t be popular.
-
Not at all. The money would need to be replaced and in most locations that would mean a property tax increase that would be notable and directly ascribable to that action. Wouldn’t be popular.
@jon-nyc said in The CATO Ten:
Not at all. The money would need to be replaced and in most locations that would mean a property tax increase that would be notable and directly ascribable to that action. Wouldn’t be popular.
Question...IF a lot of the unfunded mandates go away, and the Feds go to block grants, wouldn't that allow the states to rake off a few bureaucratic layers of management and make the money go further?
-
That’s weird, it looks like my numbered points were placed out of order…
