Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes

[xenon]

This is what I mean by no depth. Joe says - lay out the case for stolen election and he lets out a word salad of Kamalian proportions. He’s had 4 years to get his talk track and evidence together on this. He said he’d come back with a stack of papers.

https://www.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/s/zANcycnn69

As someone says in the comments, it’s
like the kid that he says he has a signed Babe Ruth card… he’ll bring it to school next week… you won’t believe it.

[Jolly]

You listened to the entire interview?

[Jolly]

BTW, 14.3M views in 14 hours

[xenon]

I did listen to the entire interview. Joe is on my regular podcast rotation, I listen to a lot of his interviews.

Trump talks in generalities, Joe is a well-read or well-conversed dude. It’s a conversation between Trump and Joe, but Joe was usually the one with substantive or interesting examples on most topics.

[kluurs]

I listened to the whole interview - long drive to the race today helped clear out most of it. I thought it was a win for Trump. Rogan is friendly territory - and it was a conversation with no hardball questions - but at the same time, I thought Trump came across more reasoned as he felt like he was on comfortable turf. He employed some Bill Clinton tools - giving specific (likely contrived) statistics - but said in a way that comes across as credible. Anyone who only heard that this man was a maniac and the next Hitler for the world would walk away feeling a bit safer voting for him. Most importantly, he made no noticeable big errors. Overall, I think the timing and performance could help Trump with anyone still vaciliating.

[Jolly]

Now, will Kamala-lama-ding-dong suddenly find time on her schedule?

[Jolly]

Catch Trump's reference to Space Force during his talk about Musk's rockets and the Starlink situation in North Carolina?

Methinks some Pentagon budgets will be rearranged if Trump is elected.

[George K]

I listened to about the first 45 minutes.

So far, not too much substance, and a lot of self-aggrandizement coming through. However, he seemed approachable, friendly, and not too "Trumpy." I stopped listening when he talked about CBS (my chili needed tending to). More tomorrow.

[xenon]

I loved how Trump was telling stories about basic Lincoln family history in the beginning, but acting like he was dropping some insider American lore. Even Joe had to say after a few mins “everyone knows this stuff, I want to know what you felt in the WH…”

But to your point, George - I think Rogan made a smart move doing a very pro-Trump opener (“the system / media is out to get you”). Trump is his Trumpiest when he’s lashing out at something / someone - but that doesn’t work as well when you’re in friendly territory.

I didn’t find anything interesting or novel in there. Even with 3 hours of content - I didn’t learn anything about Trump or his positions that I didn’t already know.

[Jolly]

I learned he knew more about boxing than I thought.

And Rogan dropped one that the Saudis are about to drop some big money into the world of boxing and top tier fights. The same guy heading up the UFC is involved in trying to get it off the ground.

[Jolly]

20 hours/20M

Yang tells Kamala, "Go".

https://nypost.com/2024/10/26/us-news/trumps-rogan-episode-hits-20m-views-in-20-hours-on-youtube/

[George K]

Those "view counts."

I have to wonder how many of them listened to the whole thing. I've only done about 35 minutes, but I'm sure I'm in that statistic of 20 million.

Yang's right, however. If you have 8% of the population listening in, even if for a few minutes, that's a market you MUST tap.

But...then there's the prickly question of reviewed subjects.

[Horace]

Nobody is confident that more Kamala is a good thing for Kamala.

[kluurs]

@Jolly said in Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes:

I learned he knew more about boxing than I thought.

Yeah, I thought that while some might review that as irrelevant, I thought Trump's depth of knowledge and fervor for MMA supported the notion that Trump represents the common man - i.e. not part of the elite.

[Aqua Letifer]

@George-K said in Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes:

Those "view counts."

I have to wonder how many of them listened to the whole thing. I've only done about 35 minutes, but I'm sure I'm in that statistic of 20 million.

Yang's right, however. If you have 8% of the population listening in, even if for a few minutes, that's a market you MUST tap.

But...then there's the prickly question of reviewed subjects.

It's YouTube. But the real platform is Spotify. As a podcast, the international standard is number of "downloads," which is defined as one minute or more of streaming.

Stream time's the real metric anyway, but it's of course not public.

[George K]

Yeah. You watch one minute, and it counts.

I watched about 45 minutes (and fell asleep). How does that count.

OTOH, does this correlate to "traditional" platforms? If 20 millions watch 60 minutes on youtube for 5 minutes, does it count as 20 million views?

[Aqua Letifer]

@George-K said in Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes:

Yeah. You watch one minute, and it counts.

I watched about 45 minutes (and fell asleep). How does that count.

It counts as:

• 1 download
• 45 minutes added to the show's total view time
• 45 minutes of view time within the buckets of the first 7 (and 30) days
• ???? more or fewer minutes as of X minutes past publish, compared to the channel average
• the top ???? performing episode for the channel, ranked by unique downloads

There isn't one single metric.

[Jolly]

Watched a short clip of Rogan discussing the interview with some other guys and how he would talk with Harris, if she comes on.

I'm having trouble finding that clip this morning. Anybody seen it?

[George K]

@Jolly said in Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes:

I'm having trouble finding that clip this morning. Anybody seen it?

This?

Link to video

[George K]

"Kamala really decided that getting booed by Beyoncé fans was a better move than doing Rogan."