Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Well, that determines my choice.

Well, that determines my choice.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
6 Posts 3 Posters 39 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Porn Industry Jumps Into the Presidential Campaign, Targeting Project 2025

    Seventeen pornographic film actors on Monday announced that they had launched a $100,000 ad campaign on porn sites warning that Project 2025 — the Heritage Foundation blueprint for a Republican administration that has been a centerpiece of some Democratic campaigns — wants to ban pornography and imprison people who produce it. The online ads will run in the states that will decide the presidency: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada.

    The architects of the “hands off my porn” campaign are nothing if not aware of the polling. Vice President Kamala Harris is losing to former President Donald J. Trump among men, but younger men might be winnable — and pornographic websites are among the most heavily trafficked on the internet.

    Quoting the Survey Center on American Life, the group said younger men are the biggest consumers of the industry’s products: Among men aged 18-29, 44 percent had watched porn within the past month. Among men aged 30-49, it was 57 percent.

    “I have been in this industry for over 25 years and have witnessed many attacks on our industry, but Project 2025’s ban on pornography is the most extreme proposal I have ever seen, and voters have to take that threat seriously,” Holly Randall, a pornographic film actor, said in the group’s announcement. “We cannot simply rely on precedent that consuming pornography is legal and has been legal for a long time.”

    Mr. Trump has sought to distance himself from Project 2025, saying he knows nothing about it or the people involved in its creation, though several of his allies were part of it.

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Good to see you take matters in hand.

      "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
      -Cormac McCarthy

      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
      • George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Somehow, trusting the Harris administration in matters of censorship, doesn’t particularly appeal to me.

        By the way, did anyone actually read the so-called project 2025 positions on pornography?

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          Good to see you take matters in hand.

          LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins Dad
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @jon-nyc said in Well, that determines my choice.:

          Good to see you take matters in hand.

          Well, it’s a sticky situation.

          The Brad

          1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I looked it up.

            https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

            The word pornography appears on 4 pages:

            Page 1:

            Inflation is ravaging family budgets, drug overdose deaths
            continue to escalate, and children suffer the toxic normalization of transgender-
            ism with drag queens and pornography invading their school libraries.

            Page 5:

            Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.

            Page 557:

            Ensure that it is agile enough to devote sufficient resources and
            attention to other emerging threats that involve federal interests
            such as increases in “sextortion,” ransomware, and the continued
            proliferation of child pornography.

            Page 849:

            Similarly, Congress could legislate in a way that does not
            require any platform to host illegal content; child pornography; terrorist
            speech; and indecent, profane, or similar categories of speech that Congress
            has previously carved out.

            Out of the four mentions, three of them have to do with child pornography and the other can be interpreted in that light.

            Why are pedos supporting Harris?

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG George K

              I looked it up.

              https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

              The word pornography appears on 4 pages:

              Page 1:

              Inflation is ravaging family budgets, drug overdose deaths
              continue to escalate, and children suffer the toxic normalization of transgender-
              ism with drag queens and pornography invading their school libraries.

              Page 5:

              Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.

              Page 557:

              Ensure that it is agile enough to devote sufficient resources and
              attention to other emerging threats that involve federal interests
              such as increases in “sextortion,” ransomware, and the continued
              proliferation of child pornography.

              Page 849:

              Similarly, Congress could legislate in a way that does not
              require any platform to host illegal content; child pornography; terrorist
              speech; and indecent, profane, or similar categories of speech that Congress
              has previously carved out.

              Out of the four mentions, three of them have to do with child pornography and the other can be interpreted in that light.

              Why are pedos supporting Harris?

              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @George-K said in Well, that determines my choice.:

              I looked it up.
              .

              Why are pedos supporting Harris?

              They aren’t pedos anymore, they are MAPS. And MAPS have a higher rate of suicide due to the stigmatization!

              The Brad

              1 Reply Last reply
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups