Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Made In The USA

Made In The USA

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
29 Posts 13 Posters 289 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Jolly

    @Klaus said in Made In The USA:

    True, national security is another valid exception.

    But the default should be: Trade is good! It's literally win-win.

    Not quite. Fair trade is good.

    Example... The Gilmann family operated a number of sawmills in NE Florida and a paper mill close to Fernandina. As the original brothers died out, the paper mill was shut down. The sawmills were sold to West Fraser. Now, WF is using the IP approach to the sawmills, run them into the ground and then close them.

    They've closed one sawmill last year, and just announced the closure of a second. Those closures truly hurt the rural areas of NE Florida...Especially since they have a buttload of pine timber in that part of the world.

    There are still some paper mills in the area, but pulpwood brings a lot less money to the land owner than timber.

    Florida is booming. Tons of residential construction. High demand for lumber. So why is Fraser shutting sawmills down? And you still see railcars loaded with Fraser lumber rumbling through Florida.

    Wonder if it's Canadian timber/lumber? And is Canada allowing them to dump it on the U.S. market? Or does Canada even know about it? Or is it covered by a trade agreement?

    I don't know, but it doesn't make sense that it's cheaper to cut and mill a tree thousands of miles away, when there are trees within spitting distance. And Americans need the jobs.

    AxtremusA Offline
    AxtremusA Offline
    Axtremus
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @Jolly said in Made In The USA:

    @Klaus said in Made In The USA:

    True, national security is another valid exception.

    But the default should be: Trade is good! It's literally win-win.

    Not quite. Fair trade is good.

    Example... The Gilmann family operated a number of sawmills in NE Florida and a paper mill close to Fernandina. As the original brothers died out, the paper mill was shut down. The sawmills were sold to West Fraser. Now, WF is using the IP approach to the sawmills, run them into the ground and then close them.

    They've closed one sawmill last year, and just announced the closure of a second. Those closures truly hurt the rural areas of NE Florida...Especially since they have a buttload of pine timber in that part of the world.

    There are still some paper mills in the area, but pulpwood brings a lot less money to the land owner than timber.

    Florida is booming. Tons of residential construction. High demand for lumber. So why is Fraser shutting sawmills down? And you still see railcars loaded with Fraser lumber rumbling through Florida.

    Wonder if it's Canadian timber/lumber? And is Canada allowing them to dump it on the U.S. market? Or does Canada even know about it? Or is it covered by a trade agreement?

    I don't know, but it doesn't make sense that it's cheaper to cut and mill a tree thousands of miles away, when there are trees within spitting distance. And Americans need the jobs.

    So … you want government controlled means of production, distribution, and exchange of wood and wood-based products?

    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
    • AxtremusA Axtremus

      @Jolly said in Made In The USA:

      @Klaus said in Made In The USA:

      True, national security is another valid exception.

      But the default should be: Trade is good! It's literally win-win.

      Not quite. Fair trade is good.

      Example... The Gilmann family operated a number of sawmills in NE Florida and a paper mill close to Fernandina. As the original brothers died out, the paper mill was shut down. The sawmills were sold to West Fraser. Now, WF is using the IP approach to the sawmills, run them into the ground and then close them.

      They've closed one sawmill last year, and just announced the closure of a second. Those closures truly hurt the rural areas of NE Florida...Especially since they have a buttload of pine timber in that part of the world.

      There are still some paper mills in the area, but pulpwood brings a lot less money to the land owner than timber.

      Florida is booming. Tons of residential construction. High demand for lumber. So why is Fraser shutting sawmills down? And you still see railcars loaded with Fraser lumber rumbling through Florida.

      Wonder if it's Canadian timber/lumber? And is Canada allowing them to dump it on the U.S. market? Or does Canada even know about it? Or is it covered by a trade agreement?

      I don't know, but it doesn't make sense that it's cheaper to cut and mill a tree thousands of miles away, when there are trees within spitting distance. And Americans need the jobs.

      So … you want government controlled means of production, distribution, and exchange of wood and wood-based products?

      JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @Axtremus said in Made In The USA:

      @Jolly said in Made In The USA:

      @Klaus said in Made In The USA:

      True, national security is another valid exception.

      But the default should be: Trade is good! It's literally win-win.

      Not quite. Fair trade is good.

      Example... The Gilmann family operated a number of sawmills in NE Florida and a paper mill close to Fernandina. As the original brothers died out, the paper mill was shut down. The sawmills were sold to West Fraser. Now, WF is using the IP approach to the sawmills, run them into the ground and then close them.

      They've closed one sawmill last year, and just announced the closure of a second. Those closures truly hurt the rural areas of NE Florida...Especially since they have a buttload of pine timber in that part of the world.

      There are still some paper mills in the area, but pulpwood brings a lot less money to the land owner than timber.

      Florida is booming. Tons of residential construction. High demand for lumber. So why is Fraser shutting sawmills down? And you still see railcars loaded with Fraser lumber rumbling through Florida.

      Wonder if it's Canadian timber/lumber? And is Canada allowing them to dump it on the U.S. market? Or does Canada even know about it? Or is it covered by a trade agreement?

      I don't know, but it doesn't make sense that it's cheaper to cut and mill a tree thousands of miles away, when there are trees within spitting distance. And Americans need the jobs.

      So … you want government controlled means of production, distribution, and exchange of wood and wood-based products?

      Did I say that?

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Consider US Steel and Nippon… https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/33580/nippon-steel-and-u-s-steel-merger

        It looks like the options are to sell the company to Nippon and keep the factories local in Pittsburgh, with an actual reinvestment into the Mon Valley plants and keeping thousands of jobs…. Or losing US Steel entirely. In the global marketplace, does it really matter if the company is owned domestically so long as the means of production and jobs are local? Or would we rather just see the company fold?

        The really strange thing is this is a big deal to Pittsburgh, the ultimate swing city in the ultimate swing state, and yet both candidates are taking an antagonistic approach to the purchase.

        The Brad

        taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
        • RenaudaR Offline
          RenaudaR Offline
          Renauda
          wrote on last edited by Renauda
          #24

          Wonder if it's Canadian timber/lumber? And is Canada allowing them to dump it on the U.S. market? Or does Canada even know about it? Or is it covered by a trade agreement?

          Don’t know…but probably not or maybe or maybe not.

          Take it to the WTO….

          …but be prepared to lose again.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada–United_States_softwood_lumber_dispute

          Elbows up!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

            Consider US Steel and Nippon… https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/33580/nippon-steel-and-u-s-steel-merger

            It looks like the options are to sell the company to Nippon and keep the factories local in Pittsburgh, with an actual reinvestment into the Mon Valley plants and keeping thousands of jobs…. Or losing US Steel entirely. In the global marketplace, does it really matter if the company is owned domestically so long as the means of production and jobs are local? Or would we rather just see the company fold?

            The really strange thing is this is a big deal to Pittsburgh, the ultimate swing city in the ultimate swing state, and yet both candidates are taking an antagonistic approach to the purchase.

            taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girl
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            @LuFins-Dad said in Made In The USA:

            does it really matter if the company is owned domestically so long as the means of production and jobs are local?

            Yup, kind of like the car companies. Is it better to buy a "Japanese" car that is 80% made in the US, or a "American" car that is 30% made in the US.

            (Dont know how corporate taxes, etc. figure in however)

            1 Reply Last reply
            • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

              Frankly, I kinda agree with the guy from McGregor Metals. American Labor generally sucks. American Cars are the most unreliable, American Electronics are unreliable, and if I see the Union Label, I can pretty much guess that it’s crap.

              We bitch about outsourcing our factories to 3rd world countries, but generally they do a better job. The alternative now seems to be instead of sending our factories to the 3rd world, to import the 3rd world for our factories… That’s not a great solution, either.

              Until we build a pride on our young men and women for the value of labor and a job well done, I don’t know that there’s a solution.

              In the meantime, my next car will likely be Japanese. If that means I pay more, so be it. It will still be cheaper in the long run.

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              @LuFins-Dad said in Made In The USA:

              Frankly, I kinda agree with the guy from McGregor Metals. American Labor generally sucks. American Cars are the most unreliable, American Electronics are unreliable, and if I see the Union Label, I can pretty much guess that it’s crap.

              We bitch about outsourcing our factories to 3rd world countries, but generally they do a better job. The alternative now seems to be instead of sending our factories to the 3rd world, to import the 3rd world for our factories… That’s not a great solution, either.

              Until we build a pride on our young men and women for the value of labor and a job well done, I don’t know that there’s a solution.

              In the meantime, my next car will likely be Japanese. If that means I pay more, so be it. It will still be cheaper in the long run.

              I posted a video the other day, about things you may not want to do to your home or things you may not want in buying a home.

              Don't remember if it's in that video, but the lady that has that channel has said repeatedly she will not buy or push a brand new house. The reason is materials and labor quality. Especially houses built as developments and not custom built.

              So, her cut-off point is about 2004. She said that's when most of the boomers started to retire out of the trades. She said you can see a marked fall in craftsmanship. Most construction workers today don't build quite as good of a house...

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                @taiwan_girl said in Made In The USA:

                The one I have a comment on is #1 "cheaper energy"

                What does that mean?

                It means he’s doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girl
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                @jon-nyc said in Made In The USA:

                @taiwan_girl said in Made In The USA:

                The one I have a comment on is #1 "cheaper energy"

                What does that mean?

                It means he’s doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

                I think so

                https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article293069834.html

                Donald Trump vows the price of gasoline will drop under $2 a gallon if he’s president.

                But there’s no way he can simply make that happen, say the experts.

                “There’s a zero percent chance a president can fulfill that promise,” said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, which tracks prices.

                CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
                • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                  @jon-nyc said in Made In The USA:

                  @taiwan_girl said in Made In The USA:

                  The one I have a comment on is #1 "cheaper energy"

                  What does that mean?

                  It means he’s doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

                  I think so

                  https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article293069834.html

                  Donald Trump vows the price of gasoline will drop under $2 a gallon if he’s president.

                  But there’s no way he can simply make that happen, say the experts.

                  “There’s a zero percent chance a president can fulfill that promise,” said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, which tracks prices.

                  CopperC Offline
                  CopperC Offline
                  Copper
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  @taiwan_girl said in Made In The USA:

                  But there’s no way he can simply make that happen, say the experts.

                  You need some new experts.

                  Tell your experts to read up on Mr. Nixon and gas prices.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG Offline
                    George KG Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    Let's ask those same economists if Harris's plan to "lower prices" will work.

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups