Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. No National Guard For You!

No National Guard For You!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
23 Posts 7 Posters 116 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG George K

    @taiwan_girl said in No National Guard For You!:

    I would like to see the full transcript.

    https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2024-09/26 - Milley - 4.8.21.pdf

    These might also be interesting.

    https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2024-09/25 - Miller - 3.12.21.pdf

    https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2024-09/2 - Contee - 3.17.21.pdf

    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girl
    wrote on last edited by taiwan_girl
    #21

    @George-K Thanks George

    From the Gen Milley interview

    The President just says, “Hey look at this. It’s going to be a large amount of protesters come in here on the 6th, and make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it’s a safe event.” And Miller responds by saying, “Hey, we’ve got a plan, and we’ve got it covered.” And that’s about it. That’s -- there’s not any real elaboration.

    and

    In the meeting on the 3rd of January there was no discussion to my recollection, and I’m sitting there and I’m paying close attention to all of this stuff. There was no discussion of 10,000 troops.

    and

    Was there or was there not a subsequent discussion between the President and the Secretary of Defense? I don’t know. That meeting on the 3rd of January at that was the last time I have spoken to President Trump, or have seen President Trump, other than seeing him on TV. So, there’s no interaction, and people are going to want to know this. There’s no interaction for me anyway on the 4th, the 5th, or the 6th, or anything afterwards with President Trump. I cannot confirm or deny if there was a phone call or meeting between President Trump and Secretary Miller before the events of the 6th. I don’t know that. I’m 100 percent confident that there were no phone calls, interactions with Secretary Miller and President Trump on the day of the 6th from 1430 on and I say that with confidence because I’m with Miller from 1430 on until almost midnight sort of thing

    From the interview with DC Police CHeif

    Like I said, on this particular call this after 2:00 p.m. call on the 6th it was somebody from the Army but it wasn’tSecretary McCarthy. Again I just don’t know who it was. But the speak if you will in terms of the issues are concerned with the National Guard’s presence on the ground of the U.S. Capitol. Those were the same as the conversation I had with the Secretary.

    It was, “We don’t like the optics of that, boots on the ground on the U.S. Capitol.”

    (Got too lazy to pick further comments, but did skim all three interviews)

    Okay, my summary from the three interviews:

    • Rep. Pelosi did not (and should not) have had anything to do with the request for National Guard
    • President Trump said get whoever needed to provide safety for the event on Jan 6 but did not go into specifics
    • Sec of Defense was adamant that no US tropps should be used
    • No specific request was made for an exact number of National Guard troops (other than ~350 for traffic control)
    • Nobody thought that the crowd would get out of hand

    Seems to me that the Sec. of Defense at the time probably was the one who "dropped the ball"

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Somebody takes responsibility...

      https://nypost.com/2024/06/10/us-news/nancy-pelosi-says-i-take-responsibility-for-not-having-national-guard-at-the-capitol-on-jan-6-video-shows/

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Jolly

        Somebody takes responsibility...

        https://nypost.com/2024/06/10/us-news/nancy-pelosi-says-i-take-responsibility-for-not-having-national-guard-at-the-capitol-on-jan-6-video-shows/

        taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girl
        wrote on last edited by taiwan_girl
        #23

        @Jolly said in No National Guard For You!:

        Somebody takes responsibility...

        https://nypost.com/2024/06/10/us-news/nancy-pelosi-says-i-take-responsibility-for-not-having-national-guard-at-the-capitol-on-jan-6-video-shows/

        Taking responsibility is one thing. Actually having the power to do something is another.

        There is nothing in the three interviews that I read from above (Joint Chief Chairman, DC Police Chief, Sec. Defense) that say otherwise.

        I am not blaming President Trump (even though he was the ultimate responsibility. LOL This is not like Japan where the CEO of a company will resign because a lower level staff member got caught doing something wrong)

        1 Reply Last reply
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups