Take it for what it’s worth
-
If they honestly feel that he’s not capable of fulfilling the duties, she is obligated to follow the 25th amendment.
By not actually calling for his removal, she is stating that he is fully capable of executing the duties. So why is he stepping down?
-
She used the 25th to extort/force the duly elected nominee to drop out. That is not the purpose of the 25th.
-
Here’s what I think. In the absence of evidence, people believe what they want to believe. Sometimes they continue even when there is evidence.
Seems to me like Kamala was the obvious alternative choice if Biden could be talked into stepping down. Not particularly creative but obvious. I don’t really understand the need to come up with an alternative explanation
-
IF the above it true, does President Biden endorsement of VP Harris that powerful that it "forced" all the other democrats to follow?
If he is that weakened, I think it would have been possible to get someone else other than VP Harris if that was wanted.
-
IF the above it true, does President Biden endorsement of VP Harris that powerful that it "forced" all the other democrats to follow?
If he is that weakened, I think it would have been possible to get someone else other than VP Harris if that was wanted.
@taiwan_girl said in Take it for what it’s worth:
IF the above it true, does President Biden endorsement of VP Harris that powerful that it "forced" all the other democrats to follow?
If he is that weakened, I think it would have been possible to get someone else other than VP Harris if that was wanted.
~$100M, the campaign infrastructure that was already built, and Biden still commanded about 30% of the party’s support.
Plus, the politics of interparty warfare would have amplified all of the problems.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Take it for what it’s worth:
IF the above it true, does President Biden endorsement of VP Harris that powerful that it "forced" all the other democrats to follow?
If he is that weakened, I think it would have been possible to get someone else other than VP Harris if that was wanted.
~$100M, the campaign infrastructure that was already built, and Biden still commanded about 30% of the party’s support.
Plus, the politics of interparty warfare would have amplified all of the problems.
@LuFins-Dad Ah, makes sense!!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login