What part of the ruling did they not understand?
-
"You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell
-
@Mik said in What part of the ruling did they not understand?:
I really don’t get the wailing and gnashing of teeth over this. This is not a new concept. All the court did was affirm that of a President did break laws in the course of his duty they have immunity. If the law breaking wasn’t in the course of their duty, they aren’t. And it’s for the lower courts to decide whether the action was in the course of duty.
-
@Jolly The court didn’t invalidate the law just raised the evidentiary bar.
Lots of these guys will get retried.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login