More AI
-
It's very impressive, but that example isn't indistinguishable from a real person, at least IMHO she doesn't look quite human. However, I'm sure that's coming.
At the risk of dividing by zero, presumably we'll be able to use computers to determine whether something is real or not.
-
It's very impressive, but that example isn't indistinguishable from a real person, at least IMHO she doesn't look quite human. However, I'm sure that's coming.
At the risk of dividing by zero, presumably we'll be able to use computers to determine whether something is real or not.
@Doctor-Phibes said in More AI:
It's very impressive, but that example isn't indistinguishable from a real person, at least IMHO she doesn't look quite human. However, I'm sure that's coming.
At the risk of dividing by zero, presumably we'll be able to use computers to determine whether something is real or not.
They're already doing that. Several professors, department heads and such have been interviewed about how they use ChatGPT to catch ChatGPT. They're all very impressed with themselves.
And they're often wrong. Whole lotta kids who wrote their papers are getting suspended while the cheaters are getting away with it.
This is what happens when you outsource critical thinking. Which so many are all so happy to do.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in More AI:
It's very impressive, but that example isn't indistinguishable from a real person, at least IMHO she doesn't look quite human. However, I'm sure that's coming.
At the risk of dividing by zero, presumably we'll be able to use computers to determine whether something is real or not.
They're already doing that. Several professors, department heads and such have been interviewed about how they use ChatGPT to catch ChatGPT. They're all very impressed with themselves.
And they're often wrong. Whole lotta kids who wrote their papers are getting suspended while the cheaters are getting away with it.
This is what happens when you outsource critical thinking. Which so many are all so happy to do.
@Aqua-Letifer said in More AI:
They're already doing that. Several professors, department heads and such have been interviewed about how they use ChatGPT to catch ChatGPT. They're all very impressed with themselves.
And they're often wrong. Whole lotta kids who wrote their papers are getting suspended while the cheaters are getting away with it.
This is what happens when you outsource critical thinking. Which so many are all so happy to do.
Yeah, relying on tech that you don't really understand at all to make decisions that could be life-changing is a really dumb idea.
-
presumably we'll be able to use computers to determine whether something is real or not.
Srsly, look this thing up: "Generative Adversarial Network"
It's a fairly well known machine learning technique (at least among those in the field) where you pit two systems against each other: one system to keep generate stuff, the other system keep trying to guess whether the stuff is real or artificially generated, and the two systems keep going at it and improve each other until the system cannot distinguish what's real and what's artificially generated anymore.
-
Scary stuff
