Presented without comment

[jon-nyc]

[LuFins Dad]

I wasn’t going to drink a whiskey today. Pretty sure this just tossed that plan out the window…

[Horace]

So hot

[Mik]

Be a man. Cut it off.

[Renauda]

@jon-nyc

Don’t blame you for not commenting. It’s not worth wasting words on it.

[Klaus]

Compared to some of the other nonsense from these people, this post is almost logical.

[jon-nyc]

It is the fundamental trans dilemma - how can I be womanly given that I’m a bloke? His mistake is to think it only applies during sex.

[Klaus]

But what does it even mean to be "womanly"? Is that just a set of stereotypes about women? Does this mean that women who don't fit to the stereotypes are not women?

[jon-nyc]

You’ve touched on one of the core contradictions of trans activism. Anyone can be a woman despite parts and presentation yet people need expensive medical intervention to align their bodies with their preferred gender.

[Klaus]

What you describe is the physical part of that contradiction.

I was talking about the behavioral part.

[Mik]

I wonder what a gynecologist does when one of these freaks show up.

[LuFins Dad]

@Klaus said in Presented without comment:

But what does it even mean to be "womanly"? Is that just a set of stereotypes about women? Does this mean that women who don't fit to the stereotypes are not women?

It’s commonly referred to as womanface (homage to blackface) when a guy presents as a woman, and particularly presents as the worst stereotypes.

Link to video

[Renauda]

@Mik said in Presented without comment:

I wonder what a gynecologist does when one of these freaks show up.

Good question. My first thought was refer that person to a psychiatrist. But after giving it some more thought, I’m not at all sure. Perhaps a neuroscientist for study?

[George K]

@Renauda said in Presented without comment:

But after giving it some more thought, I’m not at all sure. Perhaps a neuroscientist for study?

[Mik]

@George-K

[Mik]

Perhaps a referral would be in order.