Steinbeck
-
Reading East of Eden right now. Some social problems are more timeless than they seem:
“Our species is the only creative species, and it has only one creative instrument, the individual mind and spirit of a man. Nothing was ever created by two men. There are no good collaborations, whether in music, in art, in poetry, in mathematics, in philosophy. Once the miracle of creation has taken place, the group can build and extend it, but the group never invents anything. The preciousness lies in the lonely mind of a man. And now the forces marshaled around the concept of the group have declared a war of extermination on that preciousness, the mind of man. By disparagement, by starvation, by repressions, forced direction, and the stunning hammerblows of conditioning, the free, roving mind is being pursued, roped, blunted, drugged. It is a sad suicidal course our species seems to have taken.
And this I believe: that the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world. And this I would fight for: the freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected. And this I must fight against: any idea, religion, or government which limits or destroys the individual. This is what I am and what I am about. I can understand why a system built on a pattern must try to destroy the free mind, for this is one thing which can by inspection destroy such a system. Surely I can understand this, and I hate it and I will fight against it to preserve the one thing that separates us from the uncreative beasts. If the glory can be killed, we are lost.”
-
One of the true greats, Steinbeck.
His propositions here are being tested like never before, and it's nice to see that they've been holding up in practice.
-
Just finished that book myself a couple months ago. Actually read it rather than listened. Love Steinbeck. But of course categorical statements like "invention can only occur in a single mind" can be framed as wrong, for anybody motivated to frame the idea as wrong. Which a lot of people would, to the extent the idea was used to glorify the individual over the collective.
