Trump welcomes Q-anon to congress
-
@Jolly said in Trump welcomes Q-anon to congress:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trump welcomes Q-anon to congress:
Well, your man is golden so you've no worries.
Actually, that's a proven damn lie. But if you repeat a lie enough, the fools will believe it.
I could post pictures of Trump with Jeffrey Epstein, but what would be the point?
You have no trouble believing all kinds of rubbish about the opposition, but when it's your guy getting smeared you get really mad.
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 11:20 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Trump welcomes Q-anon to congress:
@Jolly said in Trump welcomes Q-anon to congress:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trump welcomes Q-anon to congress:
Well, your man is golden so you've no worries.
Actually, that's a proven damn lie. But if you repeat a lie enough, the fools will believe it.
I could post pictures of Trump with Jeffrey Epstein, but what would be the point?
You have no trouble believing all kinds of rubbish about the opposition, but when it's your guy getting smeared you get really mad.
The Steele Dossier is probably the most vetted document of the last ten years. Maybe longer. It is a steaming pile of male bovine scat.
You know it. I know it. I see no reason to propagate a lie.
-
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 11:29 last edited by Doctor Phibes
Yet you happily post stupid shit about Obama's supposed homosexuality.
What next, Trump only gave Stormy Daniels all that money because he's a philanthropist?
-
Yet you happily post stupid shit about Obama's supposed homosexuality.
What next, Trump only gave Stormy Daniels all that money because he's a philanthropist?
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 11:32 last edited by Jolly@Doctor-Phibes said in Trump welcomes Q-anon to congress:
Yet you happily post stupid shit about Obama's supposed homosexuality.
Those rumors have been there for many years. Have those allegations been disproved on Bath House Barry?
-
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 11:38 last edited by Doctor Phibes
How about Stormy Daniels?
It seems to me you're not particularly consistent with who has to provide the burden of proof.
-
How about Stormy Daniels?
It seems to me you're not particularly consistent with who has to provide the burden of proof.
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 11:42 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Trump welcomes Q-anon to congress:
How about Stormy Daniels?
It seems to me you're not particularly consistent with who has to provide the burden of proof.
What did I say about Stormy?
-
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 11:49 last edited by
You remained oddly silent.
-
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 12:00 last edited by
Did I say Trump didn't have sex with her?
-
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 12:03 last edited by
You remained oddly silent
-
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 12:03 last edited by
No, that takes Larry levels of PTDS to make a claim like that. You’re a piker in comparison.
-
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 15:25 last edited by
How about you changing my mind by showing where it was ever proven that Trump had sex with her?
-
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 20:48 last edited by
-
wrote on 13 Aug 2020, 22:50 last edited by
Our new social media "public squares" are bringing such diverse, fresh thinking into the mainstream.
-
wrote on 14 Aug 2020, 02:22 last edited by
-
wrote on 14 Aug 2020, 10:34 last edited by Loki
Swipe left or right Jon?